| Literature DB >> 32458633 |
Cheol Park1, Hyesook Lee2,3, Hyun Hwangbo2,3, Seon Yeong Ji2,3, Min Yeong Kim2,3, So Young Kim2,3, Su Hyun Hong2,3, Gi-Young Kim4, Yung Hyun Choi2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that Hizikia fusiforme, an edible brown seaweed, has diverse health-promoting effects; however, evidence for its anti-cancer potential is still lacking. In this study, we examined the effect of ethanol extract of H. fusiforme (EHF) on the proliferation of B16F10 mouse melanoma cells.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; B16F10 cells; Hizikia fusiforme; PI3K/Akt; ROS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32458633 PMCID: PMC7541858 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.5.1275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1Inhibition of Cell Viability and Induction of Apoptosis by EHF in B16F10 cells. (A) After treatment of B16F10 cells with the desired concentration of EHF (0-400 μg/ml) for 24 and 48 h, cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (*P<0.05, **P<0.001 and ***P<0.0001 compared to control). (B-D) Cells were treated with various concentration of EHF (0-400 μg/ml) for 48 h. (B) Morphological changes of B16F10 cells were observed by a phase-contrast microscope. (C) After staining with DAPI solution, the stained nuclei were pictured under a fluorescence microscope. Representative photographs of the morphological changes are presented. (D) The cells were collected and stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI for flow cytometry analysis. (E) The percentage of apoptotic cells are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (**P<0.001 and ***P<0.0001 compared to control).
Figure 2.Activation of Caspases and Degradation of PARP by EHF in B16F10 Cells. B16F10 cells were treated with various concentrations of EHF for 48 h. (A) The cell lysates were prepared and equal amounts of cellular proteins were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to membranes. The membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies and the proteins were visualized using an ECL detection system. The equivalent loading of proteins in each well was confirmed by actin. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. (B) The activities of caspases were evaluated using caspases colorimetric assay kits. The data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (*P<0.05, **P<0.001 and ***P<0.0001 compared to control)
Figure 3Induction of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cytosolic Release of Cytochrome c by EHF in B16F10 Cells. (A) After 48 h treatment with varying concentrations of EHF, the cells were stained with JC-1 dye and were then analyzed on a flow cytometer in order to evaluate the changes in MMP. (B) Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). Statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (***P<0.0001 compared to control). (C) The cell lysates were prepared and the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins (Bcl-2, Bax and Bid) was evaluated by Western blot analysis with whole cell lysates. Equal protein loading was confirmed by an analysis of actin. (D) Cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins were prepared and analyzed for cytochrome c expression by Western blot analysis. Equal protein loading was confirmed by analysis of actin and cytochrome oxidase subunit VI (COX VI) in each protein extract. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments
Figure 4Induction of ROS-Dependent Apoptosis by EHF in B16F10 Cells. (A and B) B16F10 cells were treated with 400 μg/ml EHF for the desired times, or pretreated with or without 10 mM NAC for 1 h and then treated with 400 μg/ml EHF for 1 h. The medium was discarded and the cells were incubated at 37°C in the dark for 20 min with new culture medium containing DCF-DA. ROS generation was measured by a flow cytometer. (B) Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (*P<0.05, **P<0.001 and ***P<0.0001 compared to control; ###p < 0.0001 when compared to EHF-treated cells). (C-E) The cells were either treated with 400 μg/ml EHF for 48 h or pre-treated with 10 mM NAC for 1 h before EHF treatment. (C) The cells were collected, fixed, and stained with DAPI solution. The stained nuclei were pictured under a fluorescence microscope. (D) The cells were collected and stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI for flow cytometry analysis. (E) The percentage of apoptotic cells are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (***P<0.0001 compared to control; ###p < 0.0001 when compared to EHF-treated cells). (F) Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (***P<0.0001 compared to control; ###p < 0.0001 when compared to EHF-treated cells).
Figure 5ROS-Dependent Inactivation of PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway by EHF in B16F10 Cells. (A) After 48 h treatment with the indicated concentrations of EHF, the cell lysates were prepared and the expression of PI3K and Akt proteins was evaluated by Western blot analysis with whole cell lysates. (B-E) The cells were pre-treated with 10 μM LY294002 and/or 10 mM NAC for 1 h and then treated with 400 μg/ml EHF for further 48 h. (B) The DAPI-stained nuclei were then observed with a fluorescence microscope. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. (C) The cells were collected and stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI for flow cytometry analysis. (E) The percentage of apoptotic cells are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance between groups (***P<0.0001 compared to control; ###P < 0.0001 when compared to EHF-treated cells; $$$P < 0.0001 when compared to EHF and LY294002-treated cells). (E) Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (***P<0.0001 compared to control; ###P < 0.0001 when compared to EHF-treated cells; $$$P < 0.0001 when compared to EHF and LY294002-treated cells).