Literature DB >> 32458559

MRI-Related Heating of Implants and Devices: A Review.

Lukas Winter1, Frank Seifert1, Luca Zilberti2, Manuel Murbach3,4, Bernd Ittermann1.   

Abstract

During an MRI scan, the radiofrequency field from the scanner's transmit coil, but also the switched gradient fields, induce currents in any conductive object in the bore. This makes any metallic medical implant an additional risk for an MRI patient, because those currents can heat up the surrounding tissues to dangerous levels. This is one of the reasons why implants are, until today, considered a contraindication for MRI; for example, by scanner manufacturers. Due to the increasing prevalence of medical implants in our aging societies, such general exclusion is no longer acceptable. Also, it should be no longer needed, because of a much-improved safety-assessment methodology, in particular in the field of numerical simulations. The present article reviews existing literature on implant-related heating effects in MRI. Concepts for risk assessment and quantification are presented and also some first attempts towards an active safety management and risk mitigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR safety; implant safety; magnetic resonance imaging; parallel transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458559     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  13 in total

Review 1.  3 T: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  Martin John Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Skin burn after magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Suzette Turner; Sheldon M Singh
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  MRI Safety Practice Observations in MRI Facilities Within the Kingdom of Jordan, Compared to the 2020 Manual on MR Safety of the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Mohammad Ayasrah
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  A fast MR-thermometry method for quantitative assessment of temperature increase near an implanted wire.

Authors:  Marylène Delcey; Pierre Bour; Valéry Ozenne; Wadie Ben Hassen; Bruno Quesson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Heating of hip joint implants in MRI: The combined effect of RF and switched-gradient fields.

Authors:  Alessandro Arduino; Umberto Zanovello; Jeff Hand; Luca Zilberti; Rüdiger Brühl; Mario Chiampi; Oriano Bottauscio
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Visible Human Project® female surface based computational phantom (Nelly) for radio-frequency safety evaluation in MRI coils.

Authors:  Gregory M Noetscher; Peter Serano; William A Wartman; Kyoko Fujimoto; Sergey N Makarov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  New Insights into MR Safety for Implantable Medical Devices.

Authors:  Kagayaki Kuroda; Satoshi Yatsushiro
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.760

8.  Development and evaluation of a numerical simulation approach to predict metal artifacts from passive implants in MRI.

Authors:  Tobias Spronk; Oliver Kraff; Jakob Kreutner; Gregor Schaefers; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.

Authors:  Mitsunori Matsumae; Jun Nishiyama; Kagayaki Kuroda
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.760

10.  A perturbation approach for ultrafast calculation of RF field enhancements near medical implants in MRI.

Authors:  Peter R S Stijnman; Bart R Steensma; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alexander J E Raaijmakers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.