Literature DB >> 32458410

Intuitive errors in learners' fraction understanding: A dual-process perspective on the natural number bias.

Jo Van Hoof1, Lieven Verschaffel2, Wim De Neys3, Wim Van Dooren2.   

Abstract

Although a good rational number understanding is very important, many learners struggle to understand fractions. Recent research attributes many of these difficulties to the natural number bias - the tendency to apply natural number features in rational number tasks where this is inappropriate. Previous correlational dual process studies found evidence for the intuitive nature of the natural number bias in learners' response latencies. However, the reported correlations do not ascertain the causality that is assumed in this ascription. In the present study we therefore experimentally elicited intuitive responses in a fraction comparison task in educated adults by restricting reaction time. Results show that the natural number bias has an intuitive character. Findings also indicate that the detection of conflict between the natural number-based answer and the correct answer seems to work at an intuitive level.

Keywords:  Dual process; Fraction; Intuition; Mathematical cognition; Reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458410     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  1 in total

1.  Math anxiety differentially impairs symbolic, but not nonsymbolic, fraction skills across development.

Authors:  Isabella Starling-Alves; Matthew R Wronski; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.691

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.