Literature DB >> 32458384

Spatial-dependent regularization to solve the inverse problem in electromyometrial imaging.

Hui Wang1,2,3, Yong Wang4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Recently, electromyometrial imaging (EMMI) was developed to non-invasively image uterine contractions in three dimensions. EMMI collects body surface electromyography (EMG) measurements and uses patient-specific body-uterus geometry generated from magnetic resonance images to reconstruct uterine electrical activity. Currently, EMMI uses the zero-order Tikhonov method with mean composite residual and smoothing operator (CRESO) to stabilize the underlying ill-posed inverse computation. However, this method is empirical and implements a global regularization parameter over all uterine sites, which is sub-optimal for EMMI given the severe eccentricity of body-uterus geometry. To address this limitation, we developed a spatial-dependent (SP) regularization method that considers both body-uterus eccentricity and EMG noise. We used electrical signals simulated with spherical and realistic geometry models to compare the reconstruction accuracy of the SP method to those of the CRESO and the L-Curve methods. The SP method reconstructed electrograms and potential maps more accurately than the other methods, especially in cases of high eccentricity and noise contamination. Thus, the SP method should facilitate clinical use of EMMI and can be used to improve the accuracy of other electrical imaging modalities, such as Electrocardiographic Imaging. Graphical abstract The spatial-dependent regularization (SP) technique was designed to improve the accuracy of Electromyometrial Imaging (EMMI). The top panel shows the eccentricity of body-uterus geometry and four representative body surface electrograms. The bottom panel shows boxplots of correlation coefficients and relative errors for the electrograms reconstructed with SP and two conventional methods, the L-Curve and mean CRESO methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyometrial imaging; Inverse problem; Regularization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458384      PMCID: PMC7347447          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02183-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  27 in total

1.  A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction.

Authors:  C H Luo; Y Rudy
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods--RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9.

Authors:  X George Xu; Valery Taranenko; Juying Zhang; Chengyu Shi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions.

Authors:  Robert E Garfield; William L Maner
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Inter-electrode delay estimators for electrohysterographic propagation analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Rabotti; Massimo Mischi; Judith O E H van Laar; Guid S Oei; Jan W M Bergmans
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  In Vivo Validation of Electrocardiographic Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs J M Cluitmans; Pietro Bonizzi; Joël M H Karel; Marco Das; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Monique M J de Jong; Frits W Prinzen; Ralf L M Peeters; Ronald L Westra; Paul G A Volders
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 6.  Uterine contraction and physiological mechanisms of modulation.

Authors:  S Wray
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

7.  Noninvasive ECG imaging of electrophysiologically abnormal substrates in infarcted hearts : A model study.

Authors:  J E Burnes; B Taccardi; R S MacLeod; Y Rudy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Minh Tam Nguyen; Shalom Darmanjian; Susan P McGorray; Neil Euliano; Allison Onkala; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Modeling Magnetomyograms of Uterine Contractions during Pregnancy Using a Multiscale Forward Electromagnetic Approach.

Authors:  Mengxue Zhang; Vanessa Tidwell; Patricio S La Rosa; James D Wilson; Hari Eswaran; Arye Nehorai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Validation and Opportunities of Electrocardiographic Imaging: From Technical Achievements to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Matthijs Cluitmans; Dana H Brooks; Rob MacLeod; Olaf Dössel; María S Guillem; Peter M van Dam; Jana Svehlikova; Bin He; John Sapp; Linwei Wang; Laura Bear
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  1 in total

1.  A multidisciplinary Prematurity Research Cohort Study.

Authors:  Molly J Stout; Jessica Chubiz; Nandini Raghuraman; Peinan Zhao; Methodius G Tuuli; Lihong V Wang; Alison G Cahill; Phillip S Cuculich; Yong Wang; Emily S Jungheim; Erik D Herzog; Justin Fay; Alan L Schwartz; George A Macones; Sarah K England
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.