Literature DB >> 32458055

Left bundle branch area. A new site for physiological pacing: a pilot study.

Asit Das1, Sk Sahidul Islam2, Sushant Kumar Pathak2, Ishita Majumdar2, Shah Alam Sharwar2, Ranita Saha2, Suman Chatterjee3.   

Abstract

Chronic RV pacing may lead to pacing induced cardiomyopathy in some patients and results in a higher risk of development of LV systolic dysfunction, heart failure, mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. His bundle pacing emerged as the most physiologic form of ventricular pacing. However, wide adoption of this technique in routine clinical practice is limited by higher capture thresholds at implant sometimes, lower R wave amplitudes, atrial over sensing and increased risk for late rise in pacing thresholds (resulting in the need for lead revisions). Some recent studies have focused on left bundle branch area pacing as a solution to these problems. In our study, we have compared left bundle branch area pacing (in 22 patients) with conventional right ventricular apical pacing (in 28 patients) who presented to us with conventional indications for pacemaker implantations in term of procedure and fluoroscopy time and short-term lead performance and left ventricular function. The results of our study showed that left bundle branch area pacing is associated with shortened QRS duration (22.36 ± 9.36 ms) and better LV function (higher left ventricular ejection fraction 64.00 ± 3.03 vs. 59.73 ± 6.73 with a p value of 0.013 and lower left ventricular diastolic internal diameter 4.58 ± 0.32 vs. 5.23 ± 0.40 cm with a p value of < 0.001) in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing. The total procedure time and fluoroscopy time was similar (63.15 ± 7.02 vs. 55.15 ± 6.16 min, p value 0.142 and 6.08 ± 1.42 vs. 5.06 ± 1.30 min, p value 0.332 respectively) in left bundle branch area pacing group. The results of this study indicate that left bundle branch area pacing may be an option for physiological pacing in patients requiring a high percentage of ventricular pacing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  His bundle pacing; Left bundle branch area pacing; Physiological pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458055     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01623-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  4 in total

1.  Optimization of Left Ventricle Pace Maker Location Using Echo-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Models.

Authors:  Longling Fan; Jing Yao; Liang Wang; Di Xu; Dalin Tang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Anatomical and histological assessment of left bundle branch area pacing in human heart with refractory heart failure.

Authors:  Jiefang Zhang; Yiwen Pan; Yaxun Sun; Guosheng Fu
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Comparison with Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients with High Ventricular Pacing Ratio ≥40.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Wenbin Li; Xiaolin Zhou; Haobo Huang; Lei Wang; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Wenbin Li; Lei Wang; Shaohua Tian; Xiaolin Zhou; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.