| Literature DB >> 32457630 |
Tianqi Tao1, Tao He1, Huimin Mao1, Xudong Wu2, Xiuhua Liu1.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine is one of the complementary and alternative therapies to improve the prognosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Taohong Siwu Decoction (THSWD), a classical traditional Chinese medication that promotes blood circulation, is clinically beneficial in CHD. However, the underlying mechanism of THSWD is still unclear. To comprehensively understand the material foundation of the "blood", it is significantly important to study the differential metabolites involved in the treatment of CHD with Chinese medicinal herb promoting blood circulation in TCM theory. Hence, this study investigated the metabolic profiles of the serum in CHD patients to determine the differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group. Eleven CHD patients were recruited and divided into two groups randomly and double-blindly. Serum samples were determined by performing non-targeted ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between identified metabolites and clinical serum indexes of CHD. Based on the result, a total of 513 metabolites were found in the serum of CHD patients, of which 27, involved in 29 metabolic pathways, were significantly different between the two groups. Among the differential metabolites, THSWD upregulated succinylcarnitine in fatty acid metabolism and 5'-methylthioadenosine in cysteine and methionine metabolism compared with the placebo group. However, THSWD downregulated pelargonic acid, involved in FA metabolism; succinate, involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle; gluconic acid, gluconolactone, and d-glucose, involved in pentose phosphate pathway; glycerophosphocholine, involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism; 8,9-dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (8,9-DiHETrE), l-lysine, N-acetyl-l-aspartic acid, N-alpha-acetyl-l-asparagine, hippurate, indoxyl sulfate, and 3-ureidopropionate involved in amino acid metabolism compared with the placebo group. Moreover, succinylcarnitine, pelargonic acid, succinate, d-glucose, gluconic acid, l-lysine, N-alpha-acetyl-l-asparagine, 5'-methylthioadenosine, indoxyl sulfate, 8,9-DiHETrE, and 3-ureidopropionate were associated with total cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein. Succinylcarnitine, pelargonic acid, gluconolactone, N-acetyl-l-aspartic acid, N-alpha-acetyl-l-asparagine, hippurate, and 5'-methylthioadenosine were associated with activated partial thromboplastin time. Our findings indicated that glycerophosphocholine, 8,9-DiHETrE, 5'-methylthioadenosine, hippurate, indoxyl sulfate, and 3-ureidopropionate might constitute the partial material foundation of the "blood" in CHD patients treated with THSWD.Entities:
Keywords: Taohong Siwu decoction; UPLC-MS/MS; coronary heart disease; metabolomics; randomized double-blind trial
Year: 2020 PMID: 32457630 PMCID: PMC7227603 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Botanical compositions of Taohong Siwu Decoction.
| Herb (Local Name) | Medicinal Parts | Amount in Application (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | 12.5 | |
| Root | 9.375 | |
| Root | 4.688 | |
| Flower | 9.375 | |
| Root | 6.25 | |
| Root | 9.375 |
All components in THSWD granules were validated using http://mpns.kew.org/mpns-portal/?_ga=1.111763972.1427522246.1459077346.
Figure 1The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) profile of the main chemical components in Taohong Siwu Decoction performed by the manufacturer.
Figure 2The chemical structures of the main chemical components of Taohong Siwu Decoction.
Concentrations of the index components of Taohong Siwu Decoction (n = 3).
| Lot Number | Mass fraction (mg·g−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbascoside | Ferulic Acid | Paeoniflorin | Amygdalin | Hydroxysafflor Yellow A | |
| 2016101801 | 0.0636 | 0.0181 | 0.2226 | 0.3731 | 0.2247 |
| 2016101802 | 0.1025 | 0.0281 | 0.1925 | 0.4401 | 0.3763 |
| 2016101803 | 0.1348 | 0.0376 | 0.4224 | 0.6239 | 0.3958 |
| Mean | 0.1003 | 0.0280 | 0.2792 | 0.4790 | 0.3323 |
Baseline characteristics of patients.
| Placebo (n = 5) | THSW (n = 6) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 1/4 | 3/3 | 0.545 |
| Age, year | 55.60 ± 6.47 | 59.83 ± 7.39 | 0.344 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.55 ± 5.26 | 25.49 ± 2.79 | 0.983 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 121.60 ± 16.70 | 132.33 ± 12.36 | 0.251 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 83.60 ± 9.94 | 77.67 ± 8.98 | 0.325 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 70.40 ± 6.07 | 67.50 ± 7.53 | 0.506 |
| RBC,×1012/L | 4.71 ± 0.15 | 4.65 ± 0.54 | 0.805 |
| HGB, g/L | 140.40 ± 7.57 | 141.33 ± 18.10 | 0.912 |
| WBC,×109/L | 6.06 ± 1.98 | 6.64 ± 1.02 | 0.544 |
| NE, % | 63.60 ± 9.72 | 58.92 ± 9.20 | 0.433 |
| PLT,×109/L | 225.80 ± 43.34 | 219.67 ± 28.40 | 0.784 |
| AST, U/L | 22.38 ± 2.00 | 21.02 ± 5.72 | 0.604 |
| ALT, U/L | 25.60 ± 8.61 | 27.98 ± 19.50 | 0.807 |
| SCr, μmol/L | 75.98 ± 14.73 | 68.33 ± 18.87 | 0.480 |
| BUN, mmol/L | 5.05 ± 0.86 | 5.43 ± 1.01 | 0.524 |
| UA, μmol/L | 338.14 ± 87.40 | 365.48 ± 70.43 | 0.579 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.97 ± 1.39 | 1.49 ± 0.60 | 0.465 |
| TC, mmol/L | 2.90 ± 1.43 | 4.73 ± 0.64* | 0.020 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.30 ± 0.47 | 1.19 ± 0.29 | 0.631 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 1.96 ± 0.49 | 2.96 ± 0.31* | 0.003 |
| Glu, mmol/L | 4.98 ± 0.56 | 5.42 ± 0.44 | 0.180 |
| PT, s | 13.12 ± 0.55 | 12.35 ± 0.83 | 0.112 |
| APTT, s | 37.42 ± 1.72 | 33.55 ± 2.50* | 0.017 |
| FIB, g/L | 2.83 ± 0.34 | 2.80 ± 0.48 | 0.902 |
| TT, s | 16.42 ± 0.66 | 17.58 ± 2.92 | 0.409 |
Values are mean ± SD.
*P < 0.05 vs. the placebo group.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RBC, red blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin; WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil; PLT, platelet; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; SCr, serum creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Glu, glucose; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB, fibrinogen; TT, thrombin time.
Clinical characteristics of patients after treatment.
| Placebo (n = 5) | THSW (n = 6) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC,×1012/L | 5.00 ± 0.22 | 4.87 ± 0.49 | 0.573 |
| HGB, g/L | 149.00 ± 9.62 | 147.00 ± 15.09 | 0.804 |
| WBC,×109/L | 5.48 ± 1.42 | 6.45 ± 1.46 | 0.296 |
| NE, % | 61.70 ± 8.84 | 56.38 ± 6.37 | 0.276 |
| PLT,×109/L | 215.60 ± 48.24 | 217.83 ± 41.83 | 0.936 |
| AST, U/L | 22.70 ± 2.42 | 23.02 ± 8.65 | 0.939 |
| ALT, U/L | 24.82 ± 4.86 | 32.52 ± 24.80 | 0.515 |
| SCr, μmol/L | 77.70 ± 13.12 | 69.00 ± 16.43 | 0.365 |
| BUN, mmol/L | 4.75 ± 1.22 | 5.16 ± 1.15 | 0.583 |
| UA, μmol/L | 343.46 ± 107.60 | 316.40 ± 67.91 | 0.623 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.40 ± 1.05 | 1.19 ± 0.44 | 0.650 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.15 ± 0.39 | 4.82 ± 1.33 | 0.307 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.48 ± 0.53 | 1.21 ± 0.29 | 0.297 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.32 ± 0.50 | 3.20 ± 0.94 | 0.095 |
| Glu, mmol/L | 4.91 ± 0.53 | 5.27 ± 0.44 | 0.256 |
| PT, s | 12.90 ± 0.45 | 12.68 ± 0.40 | 0.419 |
| APTT, s | 37.24 ± 2.72 | 35.47 ± 3.20 | 0.354 |
| FIB, g/L | 2.98 ± 0.16 | 3.24 ± 0.26 | 0.092 |
| TT, s | 16.52 ± 0.93 | 16.52 ± 1.03 | 0.996 |
Values are mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. the placebo group.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RBC, red blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin; WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil; PLT, platelet; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; SCr, serum creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Glu, glucose; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB, fibrinogen; TT, thrombin time.
Figure 3The orthogonal partial least structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plots compared the placebo group (A) with the THSWD group (B). The placebo group is shown in green color, and the THSWD group is shown in blue color. A: the two-dimensional graph of the OPLS-DA score plots. B: the three-dimensional graph of the OPLS-DA score plots.
Figure 4The 27 differential metabolites in the two groups are shown in the heat map using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (A: 24 differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group before treatment; B: 3 differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group after treatment). The row represents the metabolites, and the column represents the individual samples. The deeper the color, the greater the difference in metabolites. Red bands indicate upregulated metabolites, and blue bands indicate downregulated metabolites in the two groups.
Differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group before treatment from UPLC-MS/MS analysis.
| Differential metabolites | ESI mode | Mass (m/z) | Mass Shift (ppm) | MS/MS confirmed | RT (min) | VIP | P | FC (THSWD/placebo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threonic acid | neg | 135.0299 | -0.848793939 | Yes | 0.90 | 2.40042 | 0.00058 | 1.45 |
| Biliverdin | pos | 583.25511 | -0.460942063 | Yes | 1.89 | 2.09742 | 0.007122 | 1.93 |
| Succinylcarnitine | pos | 262.12906 | -2.25525746 | Yes | 9.46 | 2.07186 | 0.008251 | 0.66 |
| Phosphorylcholine | pos | 184.07332 | -1.733257937 | Yes | 5.83 | 2.05796 | 0.008941 | 0.71 |
| succinate | neg | 117.01881 | 4.12066833 | Yes | 0.88 | 2.01993 | 0.011028 | 1.38 |
| Sulfate | neg | 96.9601 | -0.4768798 | Yes | 0.87 | 1.99716 | 0.012423 | 1.79 |
| L-lysine | neg | 145.09773 | 3.31739348 | Yes | 1.02 | 1.93366 | 0.017102 | 1.77 |
| N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid | neg | 174.04027 | 3.13659881 | Yes | 0.88 | 1.89204 | 0.020726 | 1.60 |
| N-alpha-acetyl-L-asparagine | neg | 173.05626 | 2.43054742 | No | 18.92 | 1.87169 | 0.022759 | 1.48 |
| Propionylcarnitine | pos | 218.13868 | -0.3028414 | Yes | 7.16 | 1.85991 | 0.023979 | 1.83 |
| Myristic acid (14:0) | neg | 227.20111 | 2.41737985 | No | 11.91 | 1.8426 | 0.025752 | 0.72 |
| Bilirubin | neg | 583.25621 | 0.49360338 | No | 10.55 | 1.82541 | 0.027776 | 1.58 |
| Indoxyl sulfate | neg | 212.00178 | 2.70346738 | Yes | 6.18 | 1.7993 | 0.030837 | 2.69 |
| Gluconic acid | neg | 195.0505 | 1.95042561 | Yes | 0.90 | 1.7919 | 0.031714 | 1.60 |
| Pelargonic acid (9:0) | neg | 157.1234 | -0.3713829 | No | 8.78 | 1.77715 | 0.033688 | 1.43 |
| 3-ureidopropionate | neg | 131.04569 | 3.22608662 | No | 0.93 | 1.75349 | 0.03689 | 1.41 |
| D-(+)-Glucose | neg | 179.05611 | -0.2205941 | No | 1.00 | 1.7372 | 0.03926 | 1.43 |
| Leukotriene A4 | neg | 317.21222 | 2.07733691 | No | 13.11 | 1.73305 | 0.039865 | 0.86 |
| Hippurate | neg | 178.05097 | -0.0956546 | Yes | 4.85 | 1.71272 | 0.04291 | 4.27 |
| 8,9-DiHETrE | neg | 337.23843 | −7.429894 | No | 12.89 | 1.71191 | 0.043078 | 1.59 |
| 5′-Methylthioadenosine | pos | 298.09736 | 8.90499169 | No | 11.32 | 1.69579 | 0.045691 | 0.60 |
| 2-Pyrrolidinone | pos | 86.06004 | 0.77251831 | Yes | 1.40 | 1.69382 | 0.045915 | 0.68 |
| 2-Furoic acid | neg | 111.00876 | −0.369243 | No | 0.87 | 1.68541 | 0.047254 | 1.53 |
| Gluconolactone | neg | 177.03994 | 2.33424636 | No | 0.89 | 1.68089 | 0.047968 | 1.47 |
THSWD, Taohong Siwu Decoction; ESI, electrospray ionization; RT, retention time; VIP, variable importance in the projection; P, probability; FC, fold change; Pos, positive; Neg, negative.
Figure 6A Pearson’s correlation heat map of the serum metabolites and clinical parameters. Greater intensities of brown and blue indicate higher positive or negative correlations, respectively.
Differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group after treatment from UPLC-MS/MS analysis.
| Differential metabolites | ESI mode | Mass (m/z) | Mass Shift (ppm) | MS/MS confirmed | RT (min) | P | FC (THSWD/placebo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerophosphocholine | pos | 258.1101 | −0.5460471 | Yes | 10.39 | 0.01205 | 0.67 |
| pos | 189.12337 | 0.24395569 | Yes | 9.83 | 0.030883 | 1.21 | |
| neg | 188.05645 | −0.1722251 | No | 0.88 | 0.033159 | 1.14 |
THSWD, Taohong Siwu Decoction; ESI, electrospray ionization; RT, retention time; P, probability; FC, fold change; Pos, positive; Neg, negative.
Figure 5The disturbed metabolic pathways showed differential metabolites between the THSWD group and the placebo group by MetaboAnalyst 4.0 software. Node radius was based on pathway impact values. Node color was based on P value.
Differential metabolic pathway between the THSWD group and the placebo group.
| Pathway Name | Match Status | Match Metabolites |
|---|---|---|
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 3/32 | Gluconic acid; Gluconolactone; |
| Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism | 2/24 | N-acetyl- |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 2/39 | Phosphorylcholine;Glycerophosphocholine |
| Phenylalanine metabolism | 2/45 | Hippuric acid; Succinic acid |
| Biotin metabolism | 1/11 |
|
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 2/56 | 5′-Methylthioadenosine; Sulfate |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 2/62 | Leukotriene A4; 8,9-DiHETrE |
| Sulfur metabolism | 1/18 | Sulfate |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 1/20 | Succinic acid |
| Ether lipid metabolism | 1/23 | Glycerophosphocholine |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 1/27 | Ureidopropionic acid |
| beta-Alanine metabolism | 1/28 | Ureidopropionic acid |
| Glycolysis or gluconeogenesis | 1/31 |
|
| Lysine biosynthesis | 1/32 |
|
| Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | 2/104 | Biliverdin; Bilirubin |
| Propanoate metabolism | 1/35 | Succinic acid |
| Butanoate metabolism | 1/40 | Succinic acid |
| Galactose metabolism | 1/41 |
|
| Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism | 1/45 | Threonic acid |
| Lysine degradation | 1/47 |
|
| Fatty acid biosynthesis | 1/49 | Myristic acid |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 1/50 | Succinic acid |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | 1/50 |
|
| Pyrimidine metabolism | 1/60 | Ureidopropionic acid |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 1/75 |
|
| Tyrosine metabolism | 1/76 | Succinic acid |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 1/77 | N-Acetyl- |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 1/88 |
|
| Purine metabolism | 1/92 | Sulfate |