| Literature DB >> 32456554 |
Hideyuki Kawashima1,2, Masafumi Ono1, Norihiro Kogame1, Kuniaki Takahashi1, Chun-Chin Chang3, Hironori Hara1, Chao Gao4, Rutao Wang4, Mariusz Tomaniak5, Rodrigo Modolo1,6, Joanna J Wykrzykowska1, Robbert J De Winter1, Faisal Sharif7, Patrick W Serruys7,8, Yoshinobu Onuma7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The technology of bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) spread out after the success of the first-in-man trials of the Absorb. However, the randomized trials demonstrated that major adverse cardiac events and scaffold thrombosis rates of the first-generation Absorb were higher than those of the metallic everolimus-eluting stent. To overcome the shortcoming of the firstly commercialized Absorb, novel technologies have been developed. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we overviewed the field of BRS in the treatment of coronary, peripheral artery and gastrointestinal fields. To date, 10 BRS devices developed by 6 manufacturers have acquired the CE mark in coronary artery disease. Currently 8 BRS are in clinical trial phase, whereas 7 BRS are in preclinical assessment phase. Most new-generation devices have a strut thickness of less than 100 μm. However, late favorable outcome might be achieved not only by device refinement but also by a proper technique of implantation using intra vascular imaging guidance, as well as with a careful patient and lesion selection. EXPERT OPINION: New-generation BRS will be soon tested in the clinical arena to demonstrate improved acute and long-term of safety and efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: Bioresorbable scaffold; CE mark; absorb; new generation scaffold; scaffold thrombosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32456554 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1764932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Opin Drug Deliv ISSN: 1742-5247 Impact factor: 6.648