| Literature DB >> 32455898 |
Zhaoqian Fan1,2, Yukun Qin1,2, Song Liu1,2, Ronge Xing1,2, Huahua Yu1,2, Pengcheng Li1,2.
Abstract
Plant root-knot nematodeEntities:
Keywords: Meloidogyne incognita; chitosan oligosaccharide (COS); modification; multi-efficacy; nematicide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455898 PMCID: PMC7281207 DOI: 10.3390/md18050273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Design of chitooligosaccharide (COS) thiadizole trifluorobutylene derivative.
Scheme 1Synthesis of COS thiadiazole trifluorobutene derivative. COSSZFB: chitosan-thiadiazole-trifluorobutene. * represents structure unit.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of COS derivatives.
Figure 31H NMR spectra (A) and 13C NMR spectra (B) of COS and COS derivatives.
Results of elemental analysis, substitution degree (DS), and deacetylation degree (DD).
| Step ( | Compound | Elemental Containing | DS | Group | DD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C% | N% | S% 1 | C/N | |||||
| COS | 43.79 | 6.75 | 0.03 | 6.49 | 35.24 | acetyl | 64.76 | |
| 1 | TCDCOS | 37.00 | 11.55 | 9.12 | 3.20 | 44.31 | thiourea | 70.08 |
| 2 | DTCOS | 37.15 | 10.74 | 7.66 | 3.46 | 62.03 | dithioformyl | 72.47 |
| COSCDZ | 34.71 | 9.10 | 5.75 | 3.81 | <44.31 | thiadiazole | 72.84 | |
| 3 | COSCZFB | 33.57 | 8.41 | 6.99 | 3.99 | 29.34 | trifluorobutenyl | 78.34 |
1 large error, for reference only.
Figure 4TG/DTG curves COS and COS derivatives.
Figure 5The inhibitory effects of COS and COS derivatives on M. incognita egg hatching at 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d.
The nematicidal activity of COS and COS derivatives on M. incognita J2s at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.
| Samples | Concentration (mg/mL) | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correct Mortality (%) | LC50 (mg/mL) | Correct Mortality (%) | LC50 (mg/mL) | Correct Mortality (%) | LC50 (mg/mL) | ||
| COS | 2 | 22.48 ± 2.25 g | 6.51 | 25.13 ± 11.58 j | 4.71 | 27.02 ± 8.43 d | 3.93 |
| 4 | 43.72 ± 4.99 d,e,f | 47.33 ± 2.82 g,h,i | 53.95 ± 3.85 c | ||||
| 6 | 44.33 ± 3.31 d,e,f | 60.79 ± 13.17 d,e,f | 68.71 ± 35.32 b,c | ||||
| TCDCOS | 1.00 | 52.96 ± 3.14 c,d,e | 0.886 | 88.49 ± 10.08 a,b | 0.098 | 94.41 ± 5.29 a | 0.063 |
| 0.25 | 52.22 ± 20.09 c,d,e | 63.33 ± 12.02 d,e,f | 66.11 ± 7.52 b | ||||
| 0.063 | 22.51 ± 11.98 g | 41.01 ± 11.12 h,i | 53.52 ± 3.06 c | ||||
| DTCOS | 1.00 | 55.01 ± 1.95 c,d | 0.691 | 62.48 ± 4.87 d,e,f | 0.68 | 65.51 ± 7.86 b | 0.611 |
| 0.25 | 28.04 ± 5.57 g,h | 32.8 ± 10.33 i | 50.53 ± 6.37 c,d | ||||
| 0.063 | 8.83 ± 7.94 i | 14.85 ± 2.13 k | 24.57 ± 8.98 d | ||||
| COSCDZ | 1.00 | 65.66 ± 8.78 c | 0.131 | 81.16 ± 4.09 b,c | <0.063 | 96.67 ± 5.77 a | <0.063 |
| 0.25 | 58.65 ± 3.53 c | 72.98 ± 10.87 c,d | 96.49 ± 6.08 a | ||||
| 0.063 | 42.47 ± 4.79 d,e,f | 56.16 ± 13.3 e,f,g | 72.81 ± 15.07 b | ||||
| COSSZFB | 1.00 | 91.67 ± 8.33 a,b | 0.172 | 94.44 ± 9.62 a,b | <0.063 | 94.44 ± 9.62 a | <0.063 |
| 0.25 | 81.02 ± 5.48 b | 98.04 ± 3.4 a | 100 ± 0 a | ||||
| 0.063 | 34.36 ± 6.37 f,g,h | 70.77 ± 10.88 c,d,e | 88.54 ± 2.99 a | ||||
| fluensulfone | 1.00 | 100.00 a | <0.063 | 100.00 a | <0.063 | 100.00 a | <0.063 |
| 0.25 | 100.00 a | 100.00 a | 100.00 a | ||||
| 0.063 | 78.90 b | 97.60 a | 100.00 a | ||||
The superscripts (a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k) represent the levels of significant difference which were obtained according to Duncan’s test.
Figure 6Effects of derivatives on root-knot nematode (RKN) diseases in tuber assay: (A,B) are the results of average disease index (DI) at 0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL, respectively; (C) is the root-knot status of cucumber in groups of applied samples (H2O, 1 mg/mL of COS, COSSZFB (5’), and 0.5 mg/mL of fluensulfone) 7 days before inoculation; (D) is the phytotoxic status of cucumber in groups of applied samples (0.02 mg/mL of fosthiazate and fluensulfone, 1 mg/mL of COSSZFB, and H2O) 1 day before inoculation. For fosthiazate group, the seedling leaves appear yellow and withered; for the fluensulfone group, the leaves were yellow; for COSSZFB and the blank control group, the seedlings grew normally.
The effects of COS and COS derivatives on photosynthetic pigment content.
| Samples | Concentration (mg/mL) | Chl a (mg/g FW) | Chl b (mg/g FW) | Chl a + Chl b (mg/g FW) | Car (mg/g FW) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCDCOS | 0.2 | 1.27 ± 0.03 b,c | 0.79 ± 0.04 c,d | 2.07 ± 0.07 c | 0.084 ± 0.003 c | ||
| 0.4 | 1.37 ± 0.20 b,c | 0.85 ± 0.08 b,c,d | 2.22 ± 0.27 b,c | 0.082 ± 0.035 b,c | |||
| 0.8 | 1.35 ± 0.22 b,c | 0.85 ± 0.11 b,c,d | 2.20 ± 0.33 b,c | 0.084 ± 0.012 b,c | |||
| COSCDZ | 0.2 | 1.22 ± 0.05 c | 0.76 ± 0.0 2c,d | 1.99 ± 0.08 c | 0.035 ± 0.009 b,c | ||
| 0.4 | 1.55 ± 0.32 b,c | 0.94 ± 0.16 b,c | 2.48 ± 0.47 b,c | 0.072 ± 0.035 b,c | |||
| 0.8 | 1.54 ± 0.22 b,c | 0.93 ± 0.10 b,c | 2.47 ± 0.31 b,c | 0.109 ± 0.038 b | |||
| COSCDZFB | 0.2 | 1.32 ± 0.35 b,c | 0.82 ± 0.14 b,c,d | 2.14 ± 0.49 b,c | 0.084 ± 0.053 b | ||
| 0.4 | 1.58 ± 0.23 b,c | 0.94 ± 0.09 b,c | 2.52 ± 0.32 b,c | 0.100 ± 0.032 b | |||
| 0.8 | 1.70 ± 0.24 b | 0.99 ± 0.12 a,b | 2.69 ± 0.36 b | 0.127 ± 0.034 b | |||
| COS | 0.2 | 1.82 ± 0.29 c | 1.05 ± 0.11 b,c | 2.87 ± 0.4 b,c | 0.194 ± 0.032 b,c | ||
| 0.4 | 1.55 ± 0.15 b,c | 0.92 ± 0.02 b,c,d | 2.47 ± 0.17 b,c | 0.104 ± 0.024 b,c | |||
| 0.8 | 1.41 ± 0.09 b,c | 0.83 ± 0.03 b,c,d | 2.24 ± 0.11 b,c | 0.092 ± 0.018 b,c | |||
| H2O | 1.39 ± 0.19 b,c | 0.83 ± 0.08 d | 2.22 ± 0.27 c | 0.098 ± 0.033 b,c | |||
The superscripts (a,b,c,d) represent the levels of significant difference which were obtained according to Duncan’s test.
Figure 7The effect of COS and COS derivatives on chitinase (A) and β-1,3-glucanase (B). The letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) above the error bars represent the levels of significant difference which were obtained according to Duncan’s test.
Figure 8Effects of COS derivatives on mouse dendritic sarcoma cells (DCS) cell survivals at 0.2 mg/mL. The letters (a, b, c, and d) above the error bars represent the levels of significant difference which were obtained according to Duncan’s test.
The effects of COS and its derivatives (COSDTC, COSDTA, and COSDTB) on cucumber seed germination and root elongation.
| Concentration (mg/mL) | Percentage Germination | Germination Index (GI) | Relative Growth Index (RGI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COS | 0.5 | 90 ± 10 a | 0.81 ± 0.17 b,c,d,e | 0.84 ± 0.18 b,c,d |
| 1.0 | 90 ± 10 a | 0.8 ± 0.16 d,e | 0.83 ± 0.16 b,c,d | |
| 2.0 | 100 ± 0 a | 0.81 ± 0.27 b,c,d,e | 0.81 ± 0.14 c,d | |
| TCDCOS | 0.5 | 96.7 ± 5.8 a | 0.91 ± 0.14 a,b,c | 0.88 ± 0.14 b,c,d |
| 1.0 | 100 ± 0 a | 0.83 ± 0.24 a,b,c,d | 0.79 ± 0.23 d | |
| 2.0 | 96.7 ± 5.8 a | 0.93 ± 0.13 a,b,c | 0.9 ± 0.13 b,c,d | |
| DTCOS | 0.5 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.09 ± 0.34 a | 1.02 ± 0.31 b,c |
| 1.0 | 96.7 ± 5.8 a | 1.06 ± 0.23 a,b,c,d,e | 1.03 ± 0.22 b,c | |
| 2.0 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.08 ± 0.26 a,b | 1.01 ± 0.24 b,c,d | |
| COSCDZ | 0.25 | 93.3 ± 11.5 a | 1.23 ± 0.19 a,b,c,d,e | 1.23 ± 0.19 a |
| 0.5 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.02 ± 0.24 b,c,d,e | 0.95 ± 0.22 b,c,d | |
| 1 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.13 ± 0.27 a,b,c,d,e | 1.05 ± 0.25 a,b | |
| COSCZFB | 0.25 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.03 ± 0.18 e | 0.93 ± 0.16 b,c,d |
| 0.5 | 96.7 ± 5.8 a | 0.92 ± 0.12 e | 0.89 ± 0.12 b,c,d | |
| 1 | 100 ± 0 a | 1.01 ± 0.17 c,d,e | 0.94 ± 0.16 b,c,d | |
| H2O | 93.3 ± 5.8 a | 1 a,b,c,d,e | 1 b,c,d |
The superscripts (a,b,c,d,e) represent the levels of significant difference which were obtained according to Duncan’s test.