| Literature DB >> 32455771 |
Qiang Lin1, Wenbin Tong2, Bilal Hussain1, Yasir Hamid1, Min Lu1, Zhenli He3, Xiaoe Yang1.
Abstract
Cadmium (Entities:
Keywords: accumulation; cadmium; contaminated soil; genotypic; translocation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455771 PMCID: PMC7277880 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Geographical (A) and meteorological map (B) of the experimental site.
Basic physio-chemical properties of the soil used for the experiment.
| Properties | Values |
|---|---|
| Soil type | Red earth |
| pH | 5.83 ± 0.04 |
| Organic matter (%) | 7.25 ± 0.03 |
| Total N (g kg−1) | 2.10 ± 0.03 |
| Available P (mg kg−1) | 53.9 ± 4.69 |
| Available K (mg kg−1) | 120 ± 9.8 |
| Total Cd (mg kg−1) | 0.85 ± 0.06 |
| Available Cd (mg kg−1) | 0.34 ± 0.02 |
Figure 2Grain yield and biomass of 27 late rice genotypes grown on Cd contaminated soil. Presented data are means of three replicates, error bars represent standard error. Different letters at the top of bars represent significant difference among the cultivars at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Cadmium concentration in polished rice grain and accumulation in straw of 27 late rice genotypes grown on Cd contaminated soil. Presented data are means of three replicates: error bars represent standard error. Different letters at the top of bars represent significant difference at p < 0.05. MPCC denotes Maximum permissible concentration in China.
Grain Cd concentration, grain yield and mineral nutrient concentration in polished rice of cultivars in the 2nd year experiment. Data are means of three replicates; followed by different letters indicate significant difference p < 0.05. MID and HIGH represent medium and high Cd accumulation cultivars in the first-year experiment.
| Type | Cultivars | Cd Conc. (mg kg−1) | Grains Yield (kg Mu−1) | Cu (mg kg−1) | Fe (mg kg−1) | Mn (mg kg−1) | Zn (mg kg−1) | Protein % | Phytic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | LR-12 | 0.20 ± 0.00 d | 486.36 ± 0.94 b | 2.32 ± 0.08 e | 12.5 ± 1.71 d | 16.03 ± 0.22 ef | 18.73 ± 0.23 cd | 9.42 ± 0.07 c | 2.89 ± 0.06 b |
| LR-15 | 0.17 ± 0.00 d | 558.67 ± 1.11 a | 2.93 ± 0.06 bc | 14.29 ± 0.24 d | 26.24 ± 1.52 bc | 23.67 ± 0.42 b | 10.17 ± 0.08 b | 1.50 ± 0.33 cd | |
| LR-17 | 0.18 ± 0.00 d | 395.02 ± 1.04 g | 3.21 ± 0.11 a | 22.65 ± 0.99 a | 34.18 ± 1.71 a | 26.86 ± 1.03 a | 8.42 ± 0.25 d | 1.64 ± 0.17 cd | |
| MID | LR-18 | 0.26 ± 0.01 cd | 449.63 ± 6.29 c | 2.63 ± 0.04 d | 12.39 ± 0.35 d | 15.24 ± 0.08 ef | 16.76 ± 0.02 de | 8.70 ± 0.03 d | 1.31 ± 0.11 d |
| LR-7 | 0.28 ± 0.03 cd | 436.14 ± 0.86 d | 2.27 ± 0.03 e | 17.60 ± 0.42 c | 18.61 ± 0.21 def | 16.34 ± 0.15 e | 8.79 ± 0.08 d | 1.26 ± 0.25 d | |
| LR-16 | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 413.69 ± 1.79 f | 2.28 ± 0.04 e | 12.63 ± 1.72 d | 13.33 ± 0.18 f | 17.41 ± 0.41 cde | 8.02 ± 0.14 e | 1.44 ± 0.06 cd | |
| HIGH | LR-19 | 0.54 ± 0.05 b | 409.92 ± 0.09 f | 2.73 ± 0.06 cd | 18.58 ± 0.94 bc | 29.80 ± 5.15 ab | 19.14 ± 1.4 c | 10.01 ± 0.07 b | 3.53 ± 0.13 a |
| LR3 | 0.56 ± 0.05 b | 426.84 ± 0.11 e | 3.06 ± 0.11 ab | 20.98 ± 1.29 ab | 24.44 ± 0.03 bcd | 17.91 ± 0.08 cde | 10.66 ± 0.03 a | 3.62 ± 0.11 a | |
| LR-4 | 0.74 ± 0.06 a | 492.56 ± 0.85 b | 2.82 ± 0.05 cd | 22.70 ± 0.87 a | 21.26 ± 1.43 cde | 17.39 ± 0.7 cde | 7.75 ± 0.15 e | 1.94 ± 0.06 c |
Figure 4Cadmium accumulation in different parts of plant, bioaccumulation factor in polished rice grain and translocation factor of 27 late rice genotypes grown on contaminated soil. Where TF(R-S) and TF (S-G) represents root to shoot and shoot to grain translocation, respectively.
Figure 5Linear correlations between Cd, Zn concentration in polished rice and Cd concentration in different parts of the plant.
Figure 6Cluster pattern of late rice cultivars on the basis of Cd accumulation in polished rice.
Figure 7Criteria for the selection of safe production of late rice cultivars.
Figure 8Daily dietary threshold limit of late rice grain on the basis of Cd concentration in polished rice.