| Literature DB >> 32455574 |
Agnieszka Żak1,2, Natalia Siwińska2, Elżbieta Chełmecka3, Barbara Bażanów4, Ewa Romuk5, Amanda Adams6, Artur Niedźwiedź2, Dominika Stygar7.
Abstract
The study aims to assess the impact of age, pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) and insulin dysregulation (ID) in horses on selected oxidative stress markers. The study includes 32 horses, divided into three groups: "young" adult group (aged 8-16 years old) "geriatric" group (aged 18-24 years old) and the "PPID" group (aged 15-31 years old). The PPID group was further divided into two subgroups: PPID ID+ and PPID ID- based on presence or absence of ID. We measured serum antioxidant stress markers in all horses: total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), ceruloplasmin (CER), lipofuscin (LPS), malondialdehyde (MDA) and thiols concentrations (containing sulfhydryl group -SH) as well as enzymatic systems: total superoxide dismutase (SOD), cytoplasmic SOD (CuZnSOD), mitochondrial SOD activity (MnSOD). Total serum thiols were significantly lower in the geriatric group and in the PPID group compared to the young group. The MnSOD concentration was higher in the PPID ID+ group compared to the PPID ID-. LPS and MDA concentrations were lower in the PPID ID+ group compared to the PPID ID- group. In the selected study groups of horses, older age, the presence of PPID and ID in the case of PPID had no effect on the studied oxidative stress markers.Entities:
Keywords: PPID; age; horses; hyperinsulinemia; oxidative stress markers
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455574 PMCID: PMC7278619 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9050444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Detailed information on study groups and the results of endocrine tests.
| Group |
| Age | ACTH T0 | ACTH T10 | Insulin T0 | Insulin T60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | 7 | 12.1 ± 2.7 | 19.5 (18.1–21.1) | 32.9 (27.3–44.1) | 16.9 (11.3–23.9) | 40.9 (21.5–41.9) |
| Geriatric | 6 | 22.0 ± 2.2 | 26.0 (18.2–34.1) | 49.3 (35.6–57.9) | 21.5 (17.2–26.0) | 28.8 (22.8–39.4) |
| PPID | 19 | 23.6 ± 4.6 | 51.4 (25.3–91.3) | 524.0 (129.0–829.0) | 22.7 (19.8–52.4) | 56.2 (21.5–129.5) |
| PPID ID+ | 10 | 21.7 ± 4.9 | 38.4 (19.9–59.9) | 416.0 (166.0–707.0) | 49.6 (28.6–86.9) | 120.2 (66.2–149.1) |
| PPID ID− | 9 | 25.7 ± 3.1 | 77.4 (46.2–188.0) | 631.0 (129.0–1195.0) | 19.8 (15.4–22.3) | 21.5 (19.6–39.2) |
ACTH T10: adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) post thyrotropin–releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation test; insulin T60: insulin post oral sugar test (OST); Q1: first quartile is defined as the value that has an f-value equal to 0.25; Q3: The third quartile has an f-value equal to 0.75.
Comparison of selected antioxidative markers between control, geriatric and PPID groups.
| Antioxidative Markers | Young | Geriatric | PPID |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 71.0 ± 4.4 | 66.7 ± 2.7 | 68.9 ±3.9 | 0.146 | – | – | – |
|
| 148.7 ± 21.5 | 96.8 ± 13.0 | 91.3 ± 33.5 |
|
| <0.01 | 0.940 |
|
| 17.0 ± 4.1 | 16.6 ± 3.9 | 13.9 ± 2.9 |
| 0.970 | 0.163 | 0.303 |
|
| 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.102 | – | – | – |
|
| 3.8 ± 2.2 | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 7.2 ± 4.1 | 0.055 | – | – | – |
|
| 20.1 ±1.2 | 19.8 ± 1.0 | 21.1 ± 1.1 |
| 0.896 | 0.208 | 0.117 |
|
| 13.3 ± 1.1 | 12.3 ± 1.3 | 12.8 ± 0.9 | 0.217 | – | – | – |
|
| 6.8 ± 1.7 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 1.4 |
| 0.632 | 0.111 | 0.579 |
|
| 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.714 | – | – | – |
|
| 203.2 ± 46.8 | 215.3 ± 31.1 | 175.6 ± 34.0 |
| 0.833 | 0.395 | 0.157 |
PPID: pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction; SH: serum thiols; CER: ceruloplasmin; TAC: total antioxidant capacity; TOS: total oxidant status; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MnSOD: mitochondrial SOD; CuZnSOD: cytoplasmic SOD; LPS RF: lipofuscin relative fluorescence; MDA: malondialdehyde.
Figure 1Mean values of total thiol -SH concentration measured in serum of horses in young, geriatric and pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The statistical significance difference between young group vs. geriatric and PPID groups was shown.
Figure 2Inverse correlation between total serum thiol -SH concentration and age in all horses (p < 0.001, r = −0.6143).
The comparisons of antioxidative markers between PPID ID+ vs. PPID ID− groups.
| Antioxidative Markers | PPID ID− | PPID ID+ |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 69.1 ± 4.7 | 68.8 ± 4.7 | 0.197 | 0.846 |
|
| 78.9 ± 21.3 | 102.4 ± 39.4 | 1.585 | 0.131 |
|
| 14.3 ± 3.0 | 13.1 ± 2.7 | 0.944 | 0.359 |
|
| 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.806 | 0.431 |
|
| 6.0 ± 2.6 | 7.0 ± 3.4 | 0.691 | 0.499 |
|
| 21.1 ± 1.2 | 21.1 ± 1.0 | 0.104 | 0.918 |
|
| 12.3 ± 0.7 | 13.3 ± 0.7 | 3.205 |
|
|
| 8.8 ± 1.1 | 7.7 ± 1.5 | 1.826 | 0.086 |
|
| 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 3.382 |
|
|
| 196.5 ± 37.5 | 156.7 ± 15.1 | 2.981 |
|
PPID ID+: Group of horses with Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction and insulin dysregulation; PPID ID−: Group of horses with Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction without insulin dysregulation.
Figure 3Mean values of MnSOD activity measured in serum of horses in PPID ID+ and PPID ID− groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.01.
Figure 4Mean values of LPS activity measured in serum of horses in PPID ID+ and PPID ID− group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.01.
Figure 5Mean values of serum malondialdehyde (MDA) activity in PPID ID+ and PPID ID− group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.