| Literature DB >> 32455569 |
Xueqing Zhu1, Hui He1, Yanxia Li1, Haoyuan Wu1, Mingli Fu1,2,3, Daiqi Ye1,2,3, Junliang Wu1,2, Haomin Huang1, Yun Hu1, Xiaojun Niu1.
Abstract
Functional metal organic framework (MOF) derivatives have attracted tremendous attention as promising catalysts for various reactions. The thermal decomposition strategies have a vital effect on the structures and physicochemical properties of functional MOF derivatives. Nevertheless, what effect does the pyrolysis strategy have on MOF derivatives need further study. In this work, one-step (under dry air) and two-step (first under N2 and then dry air) pyrolysis are chosen to prepare the functional ceria-based MOF derivatives with novel hierarchical pore structure. In comparison with the derivatives prepared by one-step pyrolysis, the two-step pyrolysis composites exhibit better catalytic activity for toluene oxidation due to the higher contents of surface absorbed oxygen species and surface oxygen vacancies. The reusability and durability test demonstrates perfect stability of such functional MOF derivatives. The in-situ UV Raman reveals that two-step strategy is favorable for enhancing the gaseous oxygen activation ability of the functional MOF derivatives. Those findings may instruct the synthesis of functional MOF derivatives via different pyrolysis strategies as well as afford a further understanding of the crucial role of oxygen vacancies.Entities:
Keywords: functional derivatives; metal organic frameworks; oxygen activation abilities; pyrolysis strategies; toluene oxidation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455569 PMCID: PMC7279553 DOI: 10.3390/nano10050983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1SEM images of (A,B) as-synthesized Ce-BTC, (C) CeO2 (Air) and (D) CeO2 (N2-Air).
Figure 2Morphology and structure of Pt(EG)@CeO2 (Air). (A,E) TEM images, (F) HRTEM images, (G) the distribution of Pt NPs and the inset is histogram of the size distribution of Pt NPs, (B–D) EDX elemental mapping images of Pt, Ce, and O, respectively.
Figure 3Morphology and structure of Pt(EG)@CeO2 (N2-Air). (A,E) TEM images, (F) HRTEM images, (G) the distribution of Pt NPs and the inset is histogram of the size distribution of Pt NPs, (B–D) EDX elemental mapping images of Pt, Ce, and O, respectively.
Figure 4Crystal structure and surface chemical properties of various functional MOF derivatives. (A) XRD patterms, (B) UV Raman spectra and XPS spectra of (C) Ce 3d and (D) O 1s for functional MOF derivatives: (a) CeO2 (Air), (b) Pt(EG)@CeO2 (Air), (c) Pt(Et)@CeO2 (Air), (d) CeO2 (N2-Air), (e) Pt(EG)@CeO2 (N2-Air), (f) Pt(Et)@CeO2 (N2-Air).
Figure 5(A) Conversion of toluene over various functional MOF derivatives. Catalyst: 200 mg; Toluene concentration: 100 ppm; WHSV: 24,000 mL g−1 h−1. (B) Arrhenius plots for the oxidation of toluene over various functional MOF derivatives. (C) Conversion of toluene over Pt(EG)@CeO2 (N2-Air) with three consecutive cycles. (D) Long-term durability test over Pt(EG)@CeO2 (N2-Air).
Figure 6(A) Gaseous oxygen activation ability of various functional MOF derivatives. (B) Gaseous oxygen activation ability of Pt(EG)@CeO2 (N2-Air) in the three runs.