Literature DB >> 32455504

Transperineal freehand multiparametric MRI fusion targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre prospective study of 1014 cases.

Giancarlo Marra1, Junlong Zhuang2, Mattia Beltrami1, Giorgio Calleris1, Xiaozhi Zhao2, Alessandro Marquis1, Yansheng Kan2, Marco Oderda1, Haifeng Huang2, Riccardo Faletti3, Qing Zhang2, Luca Molinaro4, Wei Wang2, Laura Bergamasco3, Hongqian Guo2, Paolo Gontero1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) transperineal targeted fusion biopsy (TPFBx) under local anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively screened 1327 patients with a positive mpMRI undergoing TPFBx (targeted cores and systematic cores) under local anaesthesia, at two tertiary referral institutions, between September 2016 and May 2019, for inclusion in the present study. Primary outcomes were detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as (1) International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade >1 or ISUP grade 1 with >50% involvement of prostate cancer (PCa) in a single core or in >2 cores (D1) and (2) ISUP grade >1 PCa (D2). Secondary outcomes were: assessment of peri-procedural pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and procedure timings; erectile (International Index of Erectile Function) and urinary (International Prostate Symptom Score) function changes; and complications. We also investigated the value of systematic sampling and concordance with radical prostatectomy (RP).
RESULTS: A total of 1014 patients were included, of whom csPCa was diagnosed in 39.4% (n = 400). The procedure was tolerable (NRS pain score 3.1 ± 2.3), with no impact on erectile (P = 0.45) or urinary (P = 0.58) function, and a low rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 or 2, n = 8; grade >2, n = 0). No post-biopsy sepsis was recorded. Twenty-two men (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-29) needed to undergo additional systematic biopsy to diagnose one csPCa missed by targeted biopsies (D1). ISUP grade concordance of biopsies with RP was as follows: k = 0.40 (95% CI 0.31-0.49) for targeted cores alone and k = 0.65 (95% CI 0.57-0.72; P < 0.05) overall.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of TPFBx under local anaesthesia yielded good csPCa detection and was feasible, quick, well tolerated and safe. Infectious risk was negligible. Addition of systematic to targeted cores may not be needed in all men, although it improves csPCa detection and concordance with RP.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; complications; local anaesthesia; procedural pain; prostate cancer detection; radical prostatectomy; transperineal MRI-guided fusion biopsy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32455504     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Can 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT predict pathological upgrading of prostate cancer from MRI-targeted biopsy to radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Haoli Yin; Mengxia Chen; Xuefeng Qiu; Li Qiu; Jie Gao; Danyan Li; Yao Fu; Haifeng Huang; Suhan Guo; Qing Zhang; Shuyue Ai; Feng Wang; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The SAFE Pilot Trial-SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation-For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Study Protocol.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marra; Taimur T Shah; Daniele D'Agate; Alessandro Marquis; Giorgio Calleris; Luca Lunelli; Claudia Filippini; Marco Oderda; Marco Gatti; Massimo Valerio; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Alberto Bossi; Juan Gomez-Rivas; Francesca Conte; Desiree Deandreis; Olivier Cussenot; Umberto Ricardi; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-07

Review 3.  Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Emily Cheng; Meenakshi Davuluri; Patrick J Lewicki; Jim C Hu; Spyridon P Basourakos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.808

4.  Comparison of a Personalized Prostate Biopsy Pattern With Traditional Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Different Cancer Detection Rate.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Sifeng Qu; Yaofeng Zhu; Shuo Wang; Haoyu Sun; Hu Guo; Benkang Shi; Shouzhen Chen
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 5.  Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Mark N Alshak; Patrick J Lewicki; Emily Cheng; Michael Tzeng; Antonio P DeRosa; Mathew J Allaway; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Hiten D Patel; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 6.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Jack Power; Mark Murphy; Barry Hutchinson; Daragh Murphy; Michelle McNicholas; Kiaran O'Malley; John Murray; Carmel Cronin
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-25

7.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Upgrade From Combined Transperineal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Final Pathology: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Junlong Zhuang; Yansheng Kan; Yuwen Wang; Alessandro Marquis; Xuefeng Qiu; Marco Oderda; Haifeng Huang; Marco Gatti; Fan Zhang; Paolo Gontero; Linfeng Xu; Giorgio Calleris; Yao Fu; Bing Zhang; Giancarlo Marra; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.