Zhiying Li1, Yang Wu1, Youming Shen1, Biao Gu2. 1. Hunan Province Engineering Research Center of Electroplating Wastewater Reuse Technology, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Treatment Functional Materials, Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for The Construction & Development of Dongting Lake Ecological Economic ZoneCollege of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, P. R. China. 2. Key Laboratory of Functional Organometallic Materials of College of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421008, P. R. China.
Abstract
Thiophenol as a highly toxic compound can harm the environment and living organisms and thus demands effective detection. In this work, we presented a near-infrared fluorescent probe (DAPH-DNP) for detecting thiophenol according to the ESIPT mechanism using 2,4-dinitrophenyl group as a recognition unit. This probe displayed specificity toward thiophenol over other related analytes. Meanwhile, there was good linearity between the relative fluorescence intensity of DAPH-DNP and the concentration of thiophenol in the range of 0-80 μM. This probe also showed a low detection limit of 3.8 × 10-8 and a marked Stokes shift (192 nm). Further, this probe could be used for monitoring thiophenol in environmental water samples and imaging thiophenol in living cells, which indicated that this probe had a real application in the environment and living organisms.
Thiophenol as a highly toxic compound can harm the environment and living organisms and thus demands effective detection. In this work, we presented a near-infrared fluorescent probe (DAPH-DNP) for detecting thiophenol according to the ESIPT mechanism using 2,4-dinitrophenyl group as a recognition unit. This probe displayed specificity toward thiophenol over other related analytes. Meanwhile, there was good linearity between the relative fluorescence intensity of DAPH-DNP and the concentration of thiophenol in the range of 0-80 μM. This probe also showed a low detection limit of 3.8 × 10-8 and a marked Stokes shift (192 nm). Further, this probe could be used for monitoring thiophenol in environmentalwater samples and imaging thiophenol in living cells, which indicated that this probe had a real application in the environment and living organisms.
Thiophenol
plays important roles in pharmaceutical industries and
manufacturing agrochemical.[1−3] However, the potential hazards
of thiophenol to the biological and ecological environments cannot
be non-negligible due to its high toxicity. For instance, the LC50 of thiophenol for fish is in the range of 0.01–0.4
mM.[4] The LD50 of thiophenol
is 25 mg/kg for mice, 24 mg/kg for birds,[5] and 46 mg/kg for rats.[6] Moreover, thiophenol
can be absorbed by skin contact and inhalation, which can result in
many diseases including muscular weakness, central nerve injury, nausea,
coma, vomiting, shortness of breath, and even death.[7,8] For this reason, thiophenol is recognized by the USEPA as a prioritized
pollutant.[3,9] Hence, it is of great significance to develop
effective methods for monitoring thiophenol in the environment and
biological systems.The traditional methods, such as high-performance
liquid chromatography
(HPLC),[10] gas chromatography–mass
spectrometry (GC–MS),[11] and UV,[12] have been established for thiophenol detection
in the environment. Although these methods have displayed good reproducibility
and accuracy toward thiophenol, they are unsuitable for detection
of thiophenol in living samples owing to the needs of high cell or
tissue destruction. By contrast, fluorescent-based probes have great
potential applications in both environmental and biological systems
because of their high sensitivity, simplicity, lower detection limits,
and nondestructive detection.[13−20] However, development of fluorescent probes for thiophenol is extremely
challenging to differentiate thiophenol from thiols due to similar
chemical properties between thiophenol and thiols. Fortunately, since
the pioneer work of distinguishing thiophenol and thiols from Wang,[21] a number of probes have been developed based
2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonate and dinitrophenyl ether recognition groups.[22−43] Although those probes worked well, many limitations in practical
use remain to be overcome. For example, some probes could suffer from
slow response (>10 min) or need of surfactants to accelerate the
reactions,
which was a disadvantage for real-time detection. Some probes might
be subject to a small Stokes shift (<100 nm), which was defects
for sensitivity determination and bioimaging due to the self-absorption
interference. Furthermore, most of the reported thiophenol fluorescent
probes emitted in the short-wavelength region (in blue or yellow emission),
which was capable of limitations in biological imaging due to the
interference by background autofluorescence of living cells and organisms.
Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probes with long-wavelength emissions
are ideal tools for overcoming the above-mentioned problems, which
has unique advantages including minimum interference of the background,
decreased photodamage to biological samples, and deep tissue penetration.[44−46] Meanwhile, the fluorescent probes with large Stokes shift can reduce
the interferences induced by autofluorescence or self-absorption and
then improve the detection accuracy and sensitivity due to the major
shifts separated emission and excitation bands, which is suitable
for fluorescence imaging.[47−57] Based on the current studies, only few probes for thiophenol detection
having all the above-mentioned merits have been reported. Therefore,
development of fast-responding, excellent selectivity, and NIR fluorescent
probes with large Stokes shift for monitoring thiophenol are still
highly demanded.Based on these analyses, a novel NIR and ESIPT
fluorescent probe
(2E,4E)-5-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-1-(2-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)phenyl)penta-2,4-dien-1-one
(DAPH-DNP) was designed and synthesized for the selective
and real-time detection of thiophenol, in which a 2,4-dinitrophenyl
(DNP) group was used as a thiophenol recognition unit and (2E,4E)-5-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)penta-2,4-dien-1-one
(DAPH) was utilized as a fluorophore (Scheme ). The DAPH dye
with an electron-donor group N,N-dimethylamino and o-hydroxyacetophenone was selected
as a fluorescence signaling unit due to its salient characteristics
including large Stokes shift, emission in the NIR region, ESIPT properties,
and easy synthetic modification. In the probe DAPH-DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenyl group was attached to the hydroxyl site, which
resulted in fluorescence quenching due to the hampering of the ESIPT
process. However, the nucleophilic substitution of dinitrophenyl ether
mediated by thiophenol would release the hydroxyl group and thus ESIPT
process produced by formed the intramolecular hydrogen bonds between
carbonyl oxygen and the hydroxyl group, accompanied with the strong
electron-donating group N,N-dimethylamino,
the probe DAPH-DNP generated NIR fluorescence emission.
Indeed, the NIR probe showed excellent sensitivity, good selectivity,
fast response rate, and large Stokes shift for thiophenol detection.
More importantly, the probe DAPH-DNP was successfully
used for thiophenol detection in water samples and living cells, which
suggested its practical application in environment and biology. To
the best of our knowledge, no NIR and ESIPT fluorescent probe for
thiophenol has been reported.
Scheme 1
Proposed Mechanism of the Detection
of Thiophenol by DAPH-DNP
Results and Discussion
Sensing Properties of DAPH-DNP for PhSH
To verify whether DAPH-DNP has sensing ability for PhSH, spectral properties
of DAPH-DNP before and after the addition of thiophenol
were tested in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)). As shown in Figure , the probe DAPH-DNP itself exhibited a maximal absorption peak at 447 nm. When thiophenol
was added to the solution of DAPH-DNP, the absorption
band at 447 nm disappeared. At the same time, a new peak at 462 nm
appeared. As a result, it implicated that thiophenol can result in
a structural change in DAPH-DNP.
Figure 1
UV–vis absorption
spectrum of DAPH-DNP in the
absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol in PBS solution (50 mM,
pH 7.4, with 10% DMF).
UV–vis absorption
spectrum of DAPH-DNP in the
absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol in PBS solution (50 mM,
pH 7.4, with 10% DMF).For the purpose to gain
further insight into DAPH-DNP for detecting thiophenol,
the fluorescence response of DAPH-DNP toward thiophenol
was examined in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with
10% DMF). As shown in Figure , the emission intensity of DAPH-DNP was negligible
in the buffer solution, which was attributed to the protection of
phenol with the 2,4-dinitrophenyl group. When thiophenol was added,
an obvious fluorescence emission band was observed at 654 nm. With
continued addition thiophenol, the normalized fluorescence intensity
of DAPH-DNP system at 654 nm was gradually enhanced.
This result, mainly owing to the cleavage reaction of thiophenol,
released the phenol and ESIPT process appeared. Moreover, a good linear
relationship between the concentration of thiophenol (0–80
μM) and the normalized fluorescence intensity at 654 nm was
acquired. Simultaneously, the normalized fluorescence intensity of
the DAPH-DNP solution increased up to 27-fold when the
concentration of thiophenol was 80 μM. The limit of detection
was calculated to be 3.8 × 10–8, which showed
that DAPH-DNP had high sensitivity for thiophenol. Therefore, DAPH-DNP can be used for quantitatively monitoring thiophenol.
Compared with other reported probes (Table ), this probe has advantages for thiophenol
detection including NIR fluorescence emission, large Stokes shift,
and relatively large linear range.
Figure 2
(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of DAPH-DNP (10
μM) in the presence of different concentrations of thiophenol
in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). (b) Linear correlation
between the normalized fluorescence intensity at 654 nm and thiophenol
concentration. λex = 462 nm.
Table 1
Comparison of DAPH-DNP with Other Probes
for Thiophenol
(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of DAPH-DNP (10
μM) in the presence of different concentrations of thiophenol
in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). (b) Linear correlation
between the normalized fluorescence intensity at 654 nm and thiophenol
concentration. λex = 462 nm.
Selectivity
and Competition
Selectivity
is an important parameter to evaluate the performance of a new probe.
To demonstrate the selectivity of DAPH-DNP, we investigated
the fluorescent response of DAPH-DNP toward relevant
species such as (PhSH, p-CH3O-PhSH, p-NH2-PhSH, p-CH3-PhSH, phenol, aniline, Gly, Hcy, Cys, GSH, NaClO, NaHS, H2O2, KSCN, NaNO2, NaBr, KI, NaHSO3, NaN3). As shown in Figure a, the introduction of thiophenol leads to
a remarkable fluorescence enhancement at 654 nm, whereas negligible
fluorescence was observed after incubation with other relevant species.
These results indicated that DAPH-DNP can selectively
for recognition.
Figure 3
Fluorescence response of DAPH-DNP (10 μM)
to
the relevant analytes in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF).
(1) Bank; (2) PhSH; (3) p-CH3O-PhSH; (4) p-NH2-PhSH; (5) p-CH3-PhSH; (6) phenol; (7) aniline; (8) Gly; (9) Hcy; (10) Cys; (11)
GSH; (12) NaClO; (13) NaHS; (14) H2O2; (15)
KSCN; (16) NaNO2; (17) NaBr; (18) KI; (19) NaHSO3; and (20) NaN3. (B) Fluorescent responses of DAPH-DNP (10 μM) to PhSH (100 μM) in the presence of various
analytes in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). (1) PhSH +
phenol; (2) PhSH + aniline; (3) PhSH + Gly; (4) PhSH + Hcy; (5) PhSH
+ Cys; (6) PhSH + GSH; (7) PhSH + NaClO; (8) PhSH + NaHS; (9) PhSH
+ H2O2; (10) PhSH + KSCN; (11) PhSH + NaNO2; (12) PhSH + NaBr; (13) PhSH + KI; (14) PhSH + NaHSO3; and (15) PhSH + NaN3. λex =
462 nm.
Fluorescence response of DAPH-DNP (10 μM)
to
the relevant analytes in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF).
(1) Bank; (2) PhSH; (3) p-CH3O-PhSH; (4) p-NH2-PhSH; (5) p-CH3-PhSH; (6) phenol; (7) aniline; (8) Gly; (9) Hcy; (10) Cys; (11)
GSH; (12) NaClO; (13) NaHS; (14) H2O2; (15)
KSCN; (16) NaNO2; (17) NaBr; (18) KI; (19) NaHSO3; and (20) NaN3. (B) Fluorescent responses of DAPH-DNP (10 μM) to PhSH (100 μM) in the presence of various
analytes in PBS solution (50 mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). (1) PhSH +
phenol; (2) PhSH + aniline; (3) PhSH + Gly; (4) PhSH + Hcy; (5) PhSH
+ Cys; (6) PhSH + GSH; (7) PhSH + NaClO; (8) PhSH + NaHS; (9) PhSH
+ H2O2; (10) PhSH + KSCN; (11) PhSH + NaNO2; (12) PhSH + NaBr; (13) PhSH + KI; (14) PhSH + NaHSO3; and (15) PhSH + NaN3. λex =
462 nm.To study the anti-interference
performance of DAPH-DNP as a thiophenol selective probe, DAPH-DNP to thiophenol
was carried out with the coexistence of different individual species.
As shown in Figure b, the fluorescence intensity of DAPH-DNP solution at
654 nm had no obviously identical to that in the case of thiophenol
alone by coexisting thiophenol and other species. The combined results
suggested that DAPH-DNP possesses strong anti-interference
ability for the detection of thiophenol.
Effect
of pH on DAPH-DNP
The effects of pH on the emission
profile of DAPH-DNP were further investigated in the
presence and absence of thiophenol.
As shown in Figure , the normalized emission intensity of the DAPH-DNP solution
at 654 nm displayed negligible changes over a wide pH range from 1.0
to 12.0, which indicated that DAPH-DNP was not affected
by the pH value. However, the normalized fluorescence intensity of DAPH-DNP system at 654 nm displayed enhancement at pH between
4.0 and 7.0 in the presence of thiophenol, exhibited the maximum normalized
fluorescence intensity at pH 7.0, and remained unchanged at pH >7.0.
This result, mainly due to the nucleophilic substitution reaction
of thiophenol with dinitrophenyl ether, does not occur under strong
acidic conditions. A physiological pH of 7.4 implies that DAPH-DNP has potential application in biological systems.
Figure 4
Fluorescence intensity
at 654 nm with different incubation times
in the absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol in PBS solution (50
mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). λex = 462 nm.
Fluorescence intensity
at 654 nm with different incubation times
in the absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol in PBS solution (50
mM, pH 7.4, with 10% DMF). λex = 462 nm.
Response Time of DAPH-DNP to PhSH
The time-dependent fluorescence intensities
of DAPH-DNP were also determined before and after the
addition of thiophenol. As shown in Figure , in the absence of thiophenol, the fluorescence
intensity of the DAPH-DNP solution at 654 nm did not
change with the increase of time, indicating that DAPH-DNP was stable. By contrast, with the introduction of thiophenol, the DAPH-DNP solution at 654 nm exhibited a fluorescence enhancement
with time and became constant after about 6 min. The rapid response
explained that DAPH-DNP can monitor thiophenol in real
time.
Figure 5
Fluorescence changes in DAPH-DNP under various pH
conditions in the absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol. λex = 462 nm.
Fluorescence changes in DAPH-DNP under various pH
conditions in the absence (a) or presence (b) of thiophenol. λex = 462 nm.
Mechanism
Study
It is known that
dinitrophenyl ether can convert to phenol by a thiophenol-triggered
nucleophilic substitution reaction. To confirm the mechanism of sensitivity
of DAPH-DNP for thiophenol, the reaction product of DAPH-DNP with thiophenol was obtained and subject to 1H NMR. As shown in Figure S1, DAPH-DNP displayed three proton signals at 8.80, 8.24, and
7.19 ppm, which were attributable to the dinitrophenyl group. Those
proton signals in DAPH-DNP disappeared, and a new peak
of phenol (13.16 ppm) appeared in the presence of thiophenol (Figure S4), indicating that thiophenol caused
the removal of dinitrophenyl group and the release of DAPH. After the addition of thiophenol, the high-resolution mass spectrometry
(HRMS) spectrum showed a peak at m/z = 294.1493 (Figure S5), corresponding
to DAPH (calcd C19H19NO2 [M + H]+, 294.3597). The data supported the responding
mechanism as displayed in Scheme .
Application of DAPH-DNP in Water
Samples
Considering the potential pollution of thiophenol
to the environment, we employed DAPH-DNP to monitor thiophenol
in the water samples from Yuanjiang River and tap water in Changde
city to investigate its practicability in environmental science. As
shown in Table S1, there was a good recovery
of thiophenol in the range from 97.0 to 103% in the water sample,
indicating that DAPH-DNP is suitable for the detection
of thiophenol in real samples.
Imaging
in Living Cells
The cytotoxicity
of DAPH-DNP was investigated by the MTT assay (Figure S7). The results displayed that DAPH-DNP showed little cytotoxicity for cells. To further
investigate the potential utility of DAPH-DNP, the experiments
of imaging thiophenol in living cells were carried out. As shown in Figure , when HeLa cells
were incubated with DAPH-DNP for 0.5 h, washing with
PBS showed no fluorescence. However, the HeLa cells, which were preloaded
with DAPH-DNP, washed with PBS, and incubated with thiophenol
for 0.5 h, showed remarkable red fluorescence. These results suggested
that DAPH-DNP can be used for imaging thiophenol in living
cells.
Figure 6
Imaging of DAPH-DNP in HeLa cells. Bright-field (A)
and fluorescence images (B) of the cells after the addition of 10
μM DAPH-DNP for 30 min. Bright-field (C) and fluorescence
images (D) of the cells incubated with DAPH-DNP for 30
min and then incubated with 80 μM PhSH for another 30 min.
Imaging of DAPH-DNP in HeLa cells. Bright-field (A)
and fluorescence images (B) of the cells after the addition of 10
μM DAPH-DNP for 30 min. Bright-field (C) and fluorescence
images (D) of the cells incubated with DAPH-DNP for 30
min and then incubated with 80 μM PhSH for another 30 min.
Conclusions
In summary,
we have synthesized a new NIR fluorescent probe DAPH-DNP for detecting thiophenol via the ESIPT mechanism.
The probe exhibited high selectivity and sensitivity, rapid response,
remarkable large Stokes shift, and NIR fluorescence recognition for
thiophenol. In practical applications, the probe can detect thiophenol
in water samples with good recoveries. Importantly, the probe is successfully
applied to image thiophenol in living cells. Taken together, the probe
is promising for the detection of thiophenol in environmental and
biological systems.
Experimental Section
Materials and Instruments
2-Hydroxyacetophenone,
cinnamaldehyde, and 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene were obtained from
Energy Chemical, China. All the other chemical reagents were commercially
available. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker AVB-500 spectrometer. HRMS analysis was performed on an
Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF system. Fluorescence spectra were
recorded on a F-7000 fluorescence spectrometer at room temperature.
UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded with a UV-2600 spectrophotometer.
The Eclipse Ti-S inverted fluorescence microscope was applied for
fluorescence imaging.
Preparation of DAPH-DNP
The DAPH compound was synthesized according
to the reported
literature.[58]DAPH (0.293
mg, 1 mmol), 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (0.223 mg, 1.2 mmol), and
K2CO3 (0.166 mg, 1.2 mmol) were dissolved in
DMF (5 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature
(RT), poured into water (10 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (2 ×
50 mL). The organic phase was evaporated and purified by silica column
chromatography product DAPH-DNP as a purplish red solid
(0.349g, 76%) (Scheme ). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 8.80
(s, 1H), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 14.5 Hz), 7.45 (t, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 14.5 Hz), 7.36-7.32 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.74 (d, 1H, J = 14.5 Hz), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 14.5 Hz),
6.64 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 3.00 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 190.3, 156.4, 151.3,
150.8, 148.2, 144.6, 141.3, 138.7, 133.4, 133.1, 131.1, 129.3, 128.9,
127.1, 125.2, 123.8, 122.1, 121.8, 118.1, 111.9, 40.1, 29.7; HRMS
calcd for C25H21N3O6 [M
+ Na]+ 482.1430, found 482.1321.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of DAPH-DNP
Spectroscopic
Measurements
The probe DAPH-DNP stock solution
was prepared (1.0 × 10–3 mol/L) in DMF. The
above stock solutions were used testing solutions
was diluted, and then incubated an appropriate volume of 50 mM PBS
buffered solution and a certain amount PhSH. The testing solutions
was measured by fluorescence spectra.
Thiophenol
Detection in Real Samples
The crud water samples (Yuanjiang
River and tap water in Changde
city) were passed through a microfiltration membrane before the test.
The water samples containing probe DAPH-DNP (10 μM)
and thiophenols (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM) were measured used fluorescent
spectra.
Cell Imaging
The HeLa cells were
seeded in a 96-well plate and allowed to attach to the culture medium
at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the cells interacted with probe DAPH-DNP (10 μM) for 0.5 h. After washing with PBS,
the cells were pretreated with thiophenol and further incubated for
0.5 h at 37 °C. The HeLa cells were washed with PBS and imaged.
As control experiments, the HeLa cells were incubated with probe DAPH-DNP (10 μM), washed with PBS, and imaged.