Literature DB >> 32454951

Graphene oxide/waterborne polyurethane nanocoatings: effects of graphene oxide content on performance properties.

C Bernard1, D G Goodwin1, X Gu1, M Celina2, M Nyden1, D Jacobs1, L Sung1, T Nguyen1.   

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) is a good nanofiller candidate for waterborne coatings because of its outstanding physical and mechanical properties, good dispersibility in water, and low cost relative to graphene. Here, we report on the performance of a one-part, waterborne polyurethane (WPU) nanocoating formulated with four different GO loadings ([0.4% to 2.0%] by mass). The degree of GO dispersion/adhesion was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy, laser scanning confocal microscopy, and Raman microscopy. Nanocoating performance was evaluated using a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer for mechanical properties, a customized coulometric permeation apparatus for oxygen barrier properties, a combustion microcalorimeter for flammability, a hot disk analyzer for thermal conductivity, thermogravimetric analysis for thermal stability, and a moisture sorption analyzer for water uptake. The results show that GO sheets were well dispersed in, and have good adhesion to, WPU. At the higher mass loadings ([1.2% or 2%] by mass), GO increased the modulus and yield strength of WPU by 300% and 200%, respectively, increased the thermal conductivity by 38%, reduced the burning heat release rate (flammability) by 43%, and reduced the oxygen permeability by up to sevenfold. The presence of GO, however, increased water vapor uptake at high humidity; the moisture content of 2% mass loading GO/WPU nanocoatings at 90% RH was almost twice that of the moisture content for unfilled WPU. Overall, with the exception of water uptake at very high humidity (> 70% RH), the observed improvements in physical and mechanical properties combined with the ease of processing suggest that GO is a viable nanofiller for WPU coatings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graphene oxide; Graphene oxide loading; Nanocoatings; Performance properties; Polymer nanocomposites; Waterborne polyurethane

Year:  2019        PMID: 32454951      PMCID: PMC7246042          DOI: 10.1007/s11998-019-00267-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coat Technol Res        ISSN: 1935-3804            Impact factor:   2.382


  24 in total

1.  Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets.

Authors:  J Scott Bunch; Scott S Verbridge; Jonathan S Alden; Arend M van der Zande; Jeevak M Parpia; Harold G Craighead; Paul L McEuen
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Synthesis challenges for graphene industry.

Authors:  Li Lin; Hailin Peng; Zhongfan Liu
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 3.  The chemistry of graphene oxide.

Authors:  Daniel R Dreyer; Sungjin Park; Christopher W Bielawski; Rodney S Ruoff
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Graphene-based composite materials.

Authors:  Sasha Stankovich; Dmitriy A Dikin; Geoffrey H B Dommett; Kevin M Kohlhaas; Eric J Zimney; Eric A Stach; Richard D Piner; SonBinh T Nguyen; Rodney S Ruoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications.

Authors:  Yanwu Zhu; Shanthi Murali; Weiwei Cai; Xuesong Li; Ji Won Suk; Jeffrey R Potts; Rodney S Ruoff
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  The rise of graphene.

Authors:  A K Geim; K S Novoselov
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Water dynamics in graphite oxide investigated with neutron scattering.

Authors:  Alexandra Buchsteiner; Anton Lerf; Jörg Pieper
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Polyurethanes: versatile materials and sustainable problem solvers for today's challenges.

Authors:  Hans-Wilhelm Engels; Hans-Georg Pirkl; Reinhard Albers; Rolf W Albach; Jens Krause; Andreas Hoffmann; Holger Casselmann; Jeff Dormish
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets.

Authors:  Dan Li; Marc B Müller; Scott Gilje; Richard B Kaner; Gordon G Wallace
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 10.  Polymer Nanocomposites-A Comparison between Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Clay as Nanofillers.

Authors:  Mrinal Bhattacharya
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Impacts of Moisture and Ultraviolet Light on the Degradation of Graphene Oxide/Polymer Nanocomposites.

Authors:  David G Goodwin; Trinny Lai; Yadong Lyu; Chen Yuan Lu; Alejandro Campos; Vytas Reipa; Tinh Nguyen; Lipiin Sung
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020

2.  Thermal, Mechanical, and Morphological Characterisations of Graphene Nanoplatelet/Graphene Oxide/High-Hard-Segment Polyurethane Nanocomposite: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Muayad Albozahid; Haneen Zuhair Naji; Zoalfokkar Kareem Alobad; Jacek K Wychowaniec; Alberto Saiani
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.