| Literature DB >> 32454860 |
Yu Tat Chan1,2, Hong Wei Zhang1, Wai Zhu Sun1, Kevin Ka Hang Or1, Yuan-Qi Guo3, Min Chen3, Guan-Yi Wu4, Guang-Yao Xu5, Connie Leung5, Sylvia Tam5, Francis Chun-Keung Mok6, Yiu Keung Kwan6, Eddie Chow6, Joshua Kam Wo Mak6, Angus Chun-Kwok Chu6, Kathy Lee7, Thomas Law7, Rita Wai Ming Wong7, Zhi-Xiu Lin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment for dysphagia as a complication of stroke. Methods and Design. This is a multicenter, pragmatic, nonrandomized, self-controlled clinical trial. A total of 39 patients were recruited from several Chinese medicine outpatient clinics and hospital-affiliated speech therapy outpatient clinics in Hong Kong. 26 patients completed all the 24 sessions of acupuncture treatment within two months, and only 12 of them were used as self-control. For the self-control group, the retrospective clinical data was taken from the electronic patient records with patient consent. The descriptive swallowing function data were converted into the quantitative Royal Brisbane Hospital Outcome Measure for Swallowing (RBHOMS) scores by two registered speech therapists through a validation process. And the data were validated by reaching consensus between the two speech therapists. All subjects underwent a baseline assessment before commencement of treatment, and outcome assessments were conducted upon the completion of treatment. The primary outcome measure is the RBHOMS score, which is a swallowing disability rating scale for monitoring difficulties in daily swallowing function. Secondary outcome measures include the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and adverse events. All the primary and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline as well as at the end of acupuncture treatment (month 2).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32454860 PMCID: PMC7240803 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4689296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The workflow of the study.
Figure 2The flowchart of the study according to the CONSORT diagram.
Demographic and disease characteristics of all subjects.
| Characteristics | Treatment group |
|---|---|
| Age (year, mean ± SD) | 70.462 ± 11.8 |
| Gender (male/female) | 15/11 |
| Stroke type (ischemic/hemorrhagic) | 24/2 |
The primary outcome measure (RBHOMS) at different time points of the entire study.
| Outcome measure | Self-control group | Intervention group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RBHOMS score mean (SD) | |||
| First assessment | 5.67 (1.723) | 5.92 (2.234) | 1.000 |
| Second assessment | 5.92 (2.234) | 6.92 (2.065) | 0.006 |
Comparison of RBHOMS and swallowing quality-of-life scores between retrospective data, baseline, and posttreatment.
| Parameters | Retrospective (three months before enrollment) | Baseline (month 0) | After treatment (2 months after enrollment) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBHOMS | 5.67 ± 1.723 (3–8) | 5.92 ± 2.234 (1–9) | 6.92 ± 2.065 (2–9) | 1.000 | 0.006 | 0.042 |
| Swallow quality-of-life score | 131.0 ± 39.9 (44–200) | 157.5 ± 31.0 (75–208) | 0.000 |
p1 is the p value of pairwise comparison between three months before enrollment and month 0; p2 is p value of pairwise comparison between month 0 and 2 months after enrollment (completion of treatment); p3 is p value of pairwise comparison between three months before enrollment and 2 months after enrollment (completion of treatment).