| Literature DB >> 32454824 |
Maria Principia Scavo1, Antonio Cigliano1, Nicoletta Depalo2, Elisabetta Fanizza2,3, Maria Grazia Bianco1, Nunzio Denora2,4, Valentino Laquintana4, Maria Lucia Curri2,3, Dionigi Lorusso5, Claudio Lotesoriere6, Alba Panarese7, Gianluigi Giannelli1,8.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/2715968.].Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32454824 PMCID: PMC7212334 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6153432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.375
Figure 1Analysis of morphology and size distribution of freshly isolated sEVs performed by TEM, SEM, and DLS investigation. Representative TEM micrographs obtained with positive (a, b, c) and negative (a1, b1, c1) staining of sEVs extracted from plasma of the healthy donors (a, a1) and the CRC (b, b1) and GC (c, c1) patients, along with their corresponding SEM images (inset a, b, c). Related size distributions by TEM (a2, b2, c2) and DLS (a3, b3, c3) analysis.
Figure 2Detection and determination of FZD-10 expression levels in sEVs isolated from cancer patients with metastasis by Western blotting and densitometry analysis. Representative Western blotting of FZD-10 and three exosomal/EV protein markers (Hsp70, CD-63, and ALIX) in sEVs extracted from patients with metastatic GC (Px GC) and metastatic CRC (Px CRC), before surgery and at different treatment steps. Molecular mass markers are indicated on the right. The same load (20 μg) of samples based on total protein content (a). Semiquantitative evaluation of relative FZD-10 expression in sEVs extracts by densitometry analysis of protein bands in (a). FZD-10 bands were measured and normalized with corresponding housekeeping Hsp70 bands, for each CRC and GC patient (three replicates). Average value of FZD-10 expression levels among all CRC or GC or metastastic CRC patients reported in graph. p < 0.005 versus healthy control. n = 6 for CRC, n = 6 for GC, and n = 8 for healthy donors (b).