Literature DB >> 32454552

3D Printing in Zero G Technology Demonstration Mission: Complete Experimental Results and Summary of Related Material Modeling Efforts.

Tracie Prater1, Niki Werkheiser1, Frank Ledbetter2, Dogan Timucin3, Kevin Wheeler3, Mike Snyder4.   

Abstract

In 2014, NASA, in partnership with Made In Space, Inc., launched the first 3D printer to the International Space Station. Results of the first phase of operations for this mission demonstrated use of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process for 3D printing in a microgravity environment. Previously published results indicated differences in density and mechanical properties of specimens printed in microgravity and those manufactured with the printer prior to its launch to ISS. Based on extensive analyses, these differences were hypothesized to be a result of subtle changes in manufacturing process settings rather than a microgravity influence on the FFF process. Phase II operations provided an opportunity to produce additional specimens in microgravity, evaluate the impact of changes in the extruder standoff distance, and ultimate provide a more rigorous assessment of microgravity effects through control of manufacturing process settings. Based on phase II results and a holistic consideration of phase I and phase II flight specimens, no engineering-significant microgravity effects on the process are noted. Results of accompanying material modeling efforts, which simulate the FFF process under a variety of conditions (including microgravity), are also presented. No significant microgravity effects on material outcomes are noted in the physics-based model of the FFF process. The 3D printing in zero G technology demonstration mission represents the first instance of off-world manufacturing. It represents the first step toward transforming logistics for long duration space exploration and is also an important crew safety enhancement for extended space missions where cargo resupply is not readily available. This paper presents the holistic results of phase I and II on-orbit operations and also includes material modeling efforts.

Year:  2018        PMID: 32454552      PMCID: PMC7243176          DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2827-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adv Manuf Technol        ISSN: 0268-3768            Impact factor:   3.226


  7 in total

1.  Protein structural changes on a CubeSat under rocket acceleration profile.

Authors:  Autumn Luna; Jacob Meisel; Kaitlin Hsu; Silvia Russi; Daniel Fernandez
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.415

2.  Space Medicines for Space Health.

Authors:  Quy Don Tran; Vienna Tran; Li Shean Toh; Philip M Williams; Nam Nghiep Tran; Volker Hessel
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.632

Review 3.  Harnessing bioengineered microbes as a versatile platform for space nutrition.

Authors:  Briardo Llorente; Thomas C Williams; Hugh D Goold; Isak S Pretorius; Ian T Paulsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  To infinity and beyond: Strategies for fabricating medicines in outer space.

Authors:  Iria Seoane-Viaño; Jun Jie Ong; Abdul W Basit; Alvaro Goyanes
Journal:  Int J Pharm X       Date:  2022-06-16

5.  3D printed laboratory equipment to measure bulk materials in extreme conditions.

Authors:  Jan Divis; Jakub Hlosta; David Zurovec; Jiri Rozbroj; Weronika Kruszelnicka; Jan Necas; Jiri Zegzulka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  VitRad: A low-cost continuous wave Doppler radar system with 3D-printed horn antennas for human vital sign detection.

Authors:  Hyunmin Jeong; Dohyun Kim; Gyoungdeuk Kim; Sangkil Kim
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Investigations of Fused Deposition Modeling for Perovskite Active Solar Cells.

Authors:  Leland Weiss; Tyler Sonsalla
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.