Literature DB >> 32454316

Establishing psychological safety in simulation: Faculty perceptions.

Carol T Kostovich1, Jenny O'Rourke2, Lee-Anne Stephen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A psychologically safe learning environment is defined as one where individuals feel comfortable to take interpersonal risks without fear of negative consequences. Despite knowledge of best practice for simulation, there is a lack of knowledge regarding how nursing faculty perceive and establish psychological safety in a simulated learning environment.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore nursing faculty's perceptions of psychological safety as it exists within a simulation learning environment for pre-licensure nursing students.
DESIGN: Mixed methods with online survey data collection. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit simulation nursing faculty who had previously participated in the National League for Nursing Leadership Development Program. Faculty were recruited from the United States and Canada.
METHODS: Data were collected using a series of open-ended questions through the online survey tool, SurveyGizmo. Content analysis was utilized to discover how faculty established psychological safety during the pre-brief, scenario, and debriefing phases of simulation. Three researchers independently, then collaboratively, reviewed the data, identifying themes and patterns across each phase.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven nursing faculty participated in the study. Across the phases of pre-brief, scenario, and debriefing, five themes emerged: (1) Setting the Stage; (2) It's ok, It's Simulation; (3) Everyone is Here to Learn; (4) Planned Strategies; and (5) Facilitator as Observer.
CONCLUSIONS: Faculty perceive that they play a role in establishing a psychologically safe learning environment during all three phases of a simulation experience. Scenarios are purposefully designed to emotionally protect students while they participate in unfamiliar encounters. Strategies are implemented throughout all three phases to facilitate student risk-taking as part of the learning process. Faculty watch for verbal and non-verbal cues by students signaling a potentially psychologically unsafe learning environment, and intervene to protect them if necessary.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32454316     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  5 in total

1.  Talking the talk in junior interprofessional education: is healthcare terminology a barrier or facilitator?

Authors:  Shamara Nadarajah; Arden Azim; Derya Uzelli Yılmaz; Matthew Sibbald
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Principles of simulation and their role in enhancing cataract surgery training.

Authors:  Thomas Charles Wood; Sundas Maqsood; William Sancha; Alex Saunders; David Lockington; Mayank A Nanavaty; Saul Rajak
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  The development of self skills in an authentic learning environment: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Gugu Ndawo
Journal:  Curationis       Date:  2022-01-18

4.  Taking simulation out of its "safe container"-exploring the bidirectional impacts of psychological safety and simulation in an emergency department.

Authors:  Eve Purdy; Laura Borchert; Anthony El-Bitar; Warwick Isaacson; Lucy Bills; Victoria Brazil
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-05

5.  The affective component of learning in simulation-based education - facilitators' strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students' emotions.

Authors:  Anine Madsgaard; Kari Røykenes; Hilde Smith-Strøm; Monika Kvernenes
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-04-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.