Literature DB >> 32453905

Microsteatosis in Livers From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Is Associated With Inferior Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation.

Natalie M Bath1, Glen Leverson2, David P Al-Adra1, Anthony M D'Alessandro1, Joshua D Mezrich1, David P Foley1.   

Abstract

The acceptable threshold remains unknown for the percentage of macrosteatosis (MaS) and microsteatosis (MiS) to yield optimal outcomes after donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). The purpose of this analysis was to determine the impact of donor liver MaS and MiS on DCD LT outcomes. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we analyzed pretransplant biopsy results from adult, solitary, DCD livers transplanted between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2017. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess graft and patient survival based on MaS and MiS severity. MiS was divided into the groups MiS ≤10% and >10%. MaS was divided into the groups MaS ≤15% and >15%. Of 7757 recovered DCD livers, 11.4% (n = 885) were biopsied and transplanted. Patients who received DCD livers with MaS >15% had significantly worse patient survival (P < 0.04), and those with MiS >10% demonstrated inferior graft and patient survival (P < 0.02). In multivariate analyses including known risk factors, both MaS >15% and MiS >10% were associated with increased risk of graft failure and patient mortality (P < 0.03). Recipient and donor age >60 years were also associated with increased risk of graft failure and patient death. This analysis demonstrates that MaS >15% and MiS >10% are additional risk factors for graft loss and patient mortality in DCD LT.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32453905      PMCID: PMC8860344          DOI: 10.1002/lt.25803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  29 in total

1.  Liver allocation and distribution: possible next steps.

Authors:  Kenneth Washburn; Elizabeth Pomfret; John Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Does Donor Allograft Microsteatosis Matter? Comparison of Outcomes in Liver Transplantation With a Propensity-Matched Cohort.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; David D Lee; Sarah Croome; Raouf E Nakhleh; Peter Abader Sedki Senada; David Livingston; Maria Yataco; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Inhibition of mitochondrial beta-oxidation as a mechanism of hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  B Fromenty; D Pessayre
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Lymphocyte depletion and risk of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients at increased risk for delayed graft function.

Authors:  Kadiyala V Ravindra; Scott Sanoff; Deepak Vikraman; Ahmad Zaaroura; Aditya Nanavati; Debra Sudan; William Irish
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Impact of hepatic macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis on the postoperative liver functions after right hepatectomy in living donors.

Authors:  Y H Shin; J S Ko; G S Kim; M S Gwak; W S Sim; A R Lee; H W Yi; J W Joh
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  Liver transplantation using fatty livers: always feasible?

Authors:  Lucas McCormack; Philipp Dutkowski; Ashraf Mohammad El-Badry; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center.

Authors:  David P Foley; Luis A Fernandez; Glen Leverson; Michael Anderson; Joshua Mezrich; Hans W Sollinger; Anthony D'Alessandro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Effect of macrovescicular steatosis and other donor and recipient characteristics on the outcome of liver transplantation.

Authors:  F Zamboni; A Franchello; E David; G Rocca; A Ricchiuti; B Lavezzo; M Rizzetto; M Salizzoni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation.

Authors:  Andrea Schlegel; Marit Kalisvaart; Irene Scalera; Richard W Laing; Hynek Mergental; Darius F Mirza; Thamara Perera; John Isaac; Philipp Dutkowski; Paolo Muiesan
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Authors:  A Kwong; W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; D P Schladt; M A Skeans; S M Noreen; J Foutz; E Miller; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.