| Literature DB >> 32453823 |
Alexander Sirakov1, Krasimir Minkin2, Marin Penkov1, Kristian Ninov2, Vasil Karakostov2, Stanimir Sirakov1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wide-necked cerebral aneurysms in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remain difficult to treat with endovascular methods despite recent progress in the neuroendovascular field.Entities:
Keywords: Bifurcation aneurysms; Coil embolization; Comaneci device; Endovascular remodeling; Wide-necked aneurysms
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32453823 PMCID: PMC7666901 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosurgery ISSN: 0148-396X Impact factor: 4.654
FIGURE 1.A Comaneci device (Rapid Medical) deployed in a silicone model. A, Example of inflated and deflated device via the control handle. B, The expaned portion could be adjusted by the operator manually.
FIGURE 2.An acutely ruptured basilar aneurysm. Diagnostic DSA A demonstrating the wide-necked basilar artery (BA) saccular B aneurysm. Note the presence of a small lobuli arising from the aneurysmal apex. 3D rotational angiography C revealed the width of the aneurysmal neck measured approximately 7.4 mm in diameter. Coil occlusion of a BA aneurysm, assisted by a Comaneci device to achieve temporary neck bridging D (note the radiopacity of the device's mesh and the distal tip). The device allowed a dense coil occlusion of the aneurysm including the neck. The Comaneci device was fully deployed for 7 min without compromising of the hemodynamic or any distal embolic complication E and F.
Baseline Patients and Aneurysmal Characteristics
| Characteristics | Value (n = 118) |
|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 55.4 years (range 29-79) |
| Mean time to assessment (h) | 24.5 h |
| Mean admission GCS | 12.7 (range 7-15) |
| Mean admission Fisher scale | 2.4 (range I-IV) |
| Mean admission WFNS grade | 1.4 (range 1-4) |
| Mean admission H&H grade | 1.5 (range 1-4) |
| Number of patients with EVD placement after treatment | 21 (17.79%) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 73 (61.9%) |
| Male | 45 (38.1%) |
| Patients transferred from outside hospitals | 75/118 (63.5%) |
|
| |
| Anterior circulation | 105 (88.9%) |
| Internal carotid artery | 24 (20.33%) |
| • Clinoid | 4 (3.4%) |
| • Ophthalmic segment | 8 (6.7%) |
| • Posterior communicating artery | 7 (5.9%) |
| • Terminus | 5 (4.2%) |
| Anterior communicating artery | 45 (38.1%) |
| Anterior cerebral artery | 15 (12.7%) |
| Middle cerebral artery | 21 (17.79%) |
| Posterior circulation | 13 (11.01%) |
| Basilar artery | 5 (4.2%) |
| Posterior cerebral artery | 1 (0.8%) |
| Supracerebellar artery | 4 (3.4%) |
| Posterior inferior cerebellar artery | 3 (2.5%) |
| Aneurysmal morphology | |
| Saccular | 118 (100%) |
| Fusiform | 0 |
| Dissecting | 0 |
| Aneurysmal size (mm) | 6.2 ± 4.1 (range from 2.6-17.3 mm) |
| Small (<10 mm) | 83 (70.3%) |
| Large (≥10 and <20 mm) | 34 (28.8%) |
| Giant (≥20 mm) | 1 (0.8%) |
| Neck width (mm) | 4.3 ± 3.1 mm (range 2.1-8.6 mm). |
| Dome-to-neck ratio | 1.3 ± 0.5 |
| Proximal parent artery diameter (mm) | 2.8 ± .1.1 |
| Distal parent artery diameter (mm) | 3.1 ± 0.6 |
EVD, external ventricular drain; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.
Summarized Procedural and Technical Details
| Characteristics | Value (n = 118) |
|---|---|
| Double antiplatelet therapy assigned | 0 (0%) |
| Successful deployment and manipulation | 118 (100%) |
| Total number of used Comaneci devices | 126 |
| ▪ Comaneci 17 | 94 (74.6%) |
| ▪ Comaneci petit | 11 (8.73%) |
| ▪ Comaneci 21 | 21 (16.6%) |
| Sufficient neck coverage | 115 (97.4%) |
| Insufficient neck coverage | 3 (2.54%) |
| Covered proximal side branches | 28 (23.7%) |
| Patent proximal side branches at the end | 100% |
| Inflation/deflation maneuvers of the device | 504 ± 108 |
| Total inflation time of the device | 390 s ranging from 180 to 900 |
| Visibility | |
| ▪ Low | 2 (1.69%) |
| ▪ Good | 35 (29.6%) |
| ▪ Excellent | 81 (68.6%) |
| Device related complications | 11 (8.73%) |
| ▪ Thromboembolic | 7 (5.93%) |
| ▪ Parent vessel rupture | |
| ▪ Aneurysmal rupture | |
| ▪ Iatrogenic vasospasm | 5 (4.2%) |
| Symptomatic complications | 3 (2.54%) |
| Procedural-related morbidity | 3 (2.54%) |
| Procedural-related mortality | 0 |
| Overall rate of good neurological outcome | 112 (100%) or 100% of the survivors |
FIGURE 3.Treatment of a ruptured saccular aneurysm of a azygos with Comaneci-assisted coil embolization. 3D rotational angiography A (note the broad aneurysmal neck). Working oblique projection B. Navigation C and anchoring the Echelon microcatherter with a few initial loops of the framing coil. Coil occlusion of the aneurysm, assisted by a Comaneci 17 device to achieve temporary neck bridging D and E. Note the slight changes or the so called “flanking” of the distal tip of the device prior and after inflation E and C. The device allowed a dense coil occlusion F of the aneurysm including the neck as seen in the final angiography.
Treatment-Related Angiographic Outcomes and Results
| Variables | Values (n = 118) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Raymond-Roy scale | |
| ▪ Class I | 83 (70.3%) |
| ▪ Class II | 32 (27.1%) |
| ▪ Class III | 3 (2.54%) |
| Angiographic outcomes at 3-mo follow-up (mean 81.1 d) | Patients among the survivors n = 112 |
| Raymond-Roy scale | |
| ▪ Class I | 81 (72.3%) |
| ▪ Class II | 18 (16.07%) |
| ▪ Class III | 13 (11.6%) |
| Angiographic outcomes at 6-mo follow-up (mean of 165.1 d) | |
| Raymond-Roy scale | |
| ▪ Class I | 75/112 (66.9%). |
| ▪ Class II | 18/112 (33.03%) |
| ▪ Class III | 19/112 (16.94%) |
| Aneurysm recanalization | |
| ▪ Recanalization among anterior circulation | 11 |
| ▪ Recanalization among posterior circulation | 5 |
| Total recanalization rate | 14.28% |
| Mean size of reanalyzed vs nonrecanalized aneurysm | 9 ± 2.4 vs 6 ± 1.12 |
| Retreated aneurysms | 37 (33.03%) |
FIGURE 4.Illustrative flow chart of study population and treatment outcomes.