Tanya K Ronson1, Yujia Wang2, Kim Baldridge2, Jay S Siegel2, Jonathan R Nitschke1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. 2. Health Sciences Platform, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China.
Abstract
The reaction of sym-pentakis(4-aminothiophenyl)corannulene with 2-formyl-6-methylpyridine and CuI or 2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline and MII (M = Co, Zn) yields an S10-symmetric 5-fold interlocked [2]catenane of two interpenetrating [CuI5L2]5+ cages or D5-symmetric [MII5L2]10+ cages, respectively. The new structures were characterized by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Density functional theory computations point to dispersive energies on par with traditional covalent bond energies. Subcomponent exchange reactions favored formation of the [CoII5L2]10+ cage over the [CuI10L4]10+ catenane. The single cage and catenane each cocrystallized with a corannulene guest to form a bowl-in-bowl substructure.
The reaction of sym-pentakis(4-aminothiophenyl)corannulene with 2-formyl-6-methylpyridine and CuI or 2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline and MII (M = Co, Zn) yields an S10-symmetric 5-fold interlocked [2]catenane of two interpenetrating [CuI5L2]5+ cages or D5-symmetric [MII5L2]10+ cages, respectively. The new structures were characterized by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Density functional theory computations point to dispersive energies on par with traditional covalent bond energies. Subcomponent exchange reactions favored formation of the [CoII5L2]10+ cage over the [CuI10L4]10+ catenane. The single cage and catenane each cocrystallized with a corannulene guest to form a bowl-in-bowl substructure.
Despite the intricate and challenging
nature of interlocked molecules, knots,[1] ravels,[2] and catenanes[3] of manifold forms have been structurally characterized,
including interlocked cages of higher order.[4] A rational synthetic approach for these systems is not yet available,
but studies have begun to assess structure–energy relationships
for these complexes.[5] In favorable situations,
host–guest studies[6] have provided
insight into structure–energy correlations of molecular aggregation
phenomena more generally.[7] Dispersive interactions
become more important with increasing size and can rival covalent
bonding energies.[8]The assembly of
subcomponents around metal ion templates[9] yields thermodynamically stable aggregates that
may have complex topologies. Judicious choice of subcomponent geometries
results in high-symmetry Platonic or Archimedean polyhedra[9a] or even entwined higher-order topological architectures
such as links and knots.[10] In this context,
corannulene, with 5-fold symmetry, has been the focus of dodecahedral
“capsid” construction.[11] Herein,
pentafold-substituted corannulene subcomponents capable of generating
ligands for tetrahedral CuI assembled into a surprisingly
highly entangled 5-fold interlocked [2]catenane of exceedingly rare S10 symmetry.[12] These
interlocked [2]catenanes expand the class of interlocked cages from
3-fold[13] and 4-fold[14] to 5-fold structures. A related assembly binding octahedral
ZnII or CoII provides a noninterlocked cognate
of D5 symmetry.Corannulene was
chosen as a suitable 5-fold-symmetric scaffold[11,15] because of its potential for functionalization via a variety of
synthetic routes[16] and its curved aromatic
surface, which may enhance the guest binding properties[17] of assemblies via aromatic stacking interactions.[18]sym-Pentakis(4-aminothiophenyl)corannulene
(subcomponent A, Figure ) was synthesized by nucleophilic aromatic substitution
from sym-pentachlorocorannulene and 4-aminothiophenol
in 1,2-dimethylimidazolone in the presence of sodium hydride (Scheme S1).
Figure 1
(a) Synthesis of 1–3 and the conversion
of 1 to 2 through subcomponent exchange.
Side-on views of the crystal structures of 1 and 2 are shown. (b) View down the S10 axis of the crystal structure of 1. (c) View down the C5 axis of the crystal structure of 2. In the images of 1, the carbon atoms of the two interlocked
[CuI5L2]5+ cages are colored
differently, and only one of the two crystallographically unique assemblies
is shown; in all cases hydrogen atoms, counterions, solvent molecules,
and disorder have been omitted for clarity.
(a) Synthesis of 1–3 and the conversion
of 1 to 2 through subcomponent exchange.
Side-on views of the crystal structures of 1 and 2 are shown. (b) View down the S10 axis of the crystal structure of 1. (c) View down the C5 axis of the crystal structure of 2. In the images of 1, the carbon atoms of the two interlocked
[CuI5L2]5+ cages are colored
differently, and only one of the two crystallographically unique assemblies
is shown; in all cases hydrogen atoms, counterions, solvent molecules,
and disorder have been omitted for clarity.The reaction of pentaaniline A (2 equiv) with 2-formyl-6-methylpyridine
(12 equiv) and tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate (CuI(MeCN)4BF4) (6 equiv)[19] in CD3CN at room temperature gave product 1 (Figure a). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 was well-resolved
but complex, consisting of two magnetically distinct environments
of equal intensity per ligand proton (Figure a). All of the peaks between 2.26 and 9.31
ppm displayed a single diffusion constant in the diffusion-ordered 1H NMR (DOSY) spectrum, suggesting that they belonged to a
single species.[20]
Figure 2
(a) 1H NMR
spectra (500 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K)
of 1. Peak assignments for the interior and exterior
ligands are marked with bold blue and italic red labels, respectively.
(b) ESI-MS spectrum of 1. The inset shows the theoretical
and observed isotope patterns for the +5 peak.
(a) 1H NMR
spectra (500 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K)
of 1. Peak assignments for the interior and exterior
ligands are marked with bold blue and italic red labels, respectively.
(b) ESI-MS spectrum of 1. The inset shows the theoretical
and observed isotope patterns for the +5 peak.Crystals of 1 were grown through vapor diffusion of
diethyl ether into an acetonitrile solution, and the solid-state structure
of 1 was elucidated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
using synchrotron radiation.[21] The crystal
structure revealed a [CuI10L4]10+ assembly consisting of a pair of 5-fold interlocked [CuI5L2]5+ cages (Figure ). The distances of 11.3–11.9
Å between neighboring metal centers create windows of sufficient
size to allow two [CuI5L2]5+ cages to interlock to form a [2]catenane. The two ligands within
each [CuI5L2]5+ cage display
the same handedness, resulting in idealized D5 cage symmetry. The interlocking of each cage with its enantiomer
lends the complete [CuI10L4]10+ assembly S10 point-group symmetry.The two [CuI5L2]5+ cages
of the [2]catenane interlock tightly, forming two bowl-in-bowl substructures
with stacked corannulenes[18] separated by
a distance of 3.69(1) Å. Within a single cage, the distance of
6.93(1) Å between the mean planes of the central pentagons of
the corannulenes creates a cavity that matches the form of the intercalated
corannulene from the other cage.The solution NMR data for 1 in CD3CN are
consistent with the solid-state structure, wherein the exo and endo
ligands give rise to distinct magnetic environments (Figure a). The imine, corannulene,
and phenylene signals for the endo ligand are shielded relative to
those of the exo ligand. NOE cross-peaks are observed between NMR
signals of the two ligands (Figure S8)
in a manner consistent with the interlocked structure observed in
the solid state. ESI-MS results are also consistent with the [CuI10L4]10+ composition (Figure b).Density
functional theory (DFT) computations of the [CuI10L4]10+ catenane and the hypothetical
[CuI5L2]5+ cage allowed
an assessment of dispersion effects on their relative energetics based
on the crystal structure of 1 vs those on the optimized
geometry and of the effects of solvation. Neglecting dispersion effects,
the energetics of the catenation process in the acetonitrile environment
was calculated to be +42.0 kcal/mol (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p):acetonitrile),
indicating that the complex is unbound. With fixed geometry, the energetics
including dispersion in the acetonitrile environment is −212
kcal/mol (B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p):acetonitrile). Estimation
of the effects of dispersion on the geometry carried out by single-point
analysis resulted in a contribution of ∼52 kcal/mol. This gives
in total ∼264 kcal/mol for the catenation process including
the effects of dispersion in an acetonitrile environment. Full optimization
of the complex including dispersion in the acetonitrile environment
(B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d,p):acetonitrile) resulted in a complexation energy
of 272.2 kcal/mol, a difference of <8 kcal/mol from the estimated
value. This substantial energy contribution for the catenation process
is consistent with the large surface area of the corannulene moieties
giving rise to substantial van der Waals interactions. Tight packing
and the large contact area between ligands within 1 play
a central role in driving the selective assembly of this structure.[18,32]Tridentate donor sites formed from imine condensation with
2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline,
suitable for the octahedral coordination of CoII and ZnII,[22] enabled investigation of whether
octahedral metal centers also give catenanes incorporating A. The reaction of A (2 equiv) with 2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline
(10 equiv) and cobalt(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (Co(NTf2)2·5H2O) (5 equiv) in CD3CN at 353 K yielded 2. The 1H NMR spectrum
reveals a single resonance for each symmetry-equivalent proton, with
the signals spread over the range −65.9 to +259.4 ppm as a
result of the paramagnetism of CoII.[23] The ESI-MS spectra are consistent with the formula [CoII5L2]10+ (Figures S14 and S17).Crystals of 2 (cocrystallized
with coronene) were
obtained through vapor diffusion of diisopropyl ether into an acetonitrile
solution of the BF4– salt containing
excess coronene.[24] Single-crystal X-ray
measurements revealed non-interlocked [CoII5L2]10+ cages composed of two 5-fold-symmetric
ligands of the same handedness bridging five octahedral CoII centers (Figure ). Both enantiomers of the D5-symmetric
cage are present in the unit cell, related by inversion. The hub pentagon
mean planes of the two corannulene moieties sit at a distance of 3.18(1)
Å from each other, closer than the 3.2–3.3 Å of graphite
planes. The corannulenes in 2 are also flattened compared
with those in 1, with an average bowl depth[25] of 0.84(3) Å versus 0.95(3) and 0.91(1)
Å for the exo and endo corannulenes in 1. Significant
distortion from regular octahedral geometry around the metal centers
is also observed, with angles of 81–84° between the CoIIN3 chelate planes, compared with angles of 84–90°
between the CuIN2 chelate planes in 1, which displayed a more regular tetrahedral geometry.Similarly,
the reaction of A (2 equiv) with 2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline
(10 equiv) and zinc(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (Zn(NTf2)2) (5 equiv) in CD3CN at 353 K yielded
[ZnII5L2]10+ assembly 3, as confirmed by ESI-MS. The 1H NMR spectrum
also displays a single set of resonances for each ligand proton environment.
Crystals were obtained by diffusion of diethyl ether into an acetonitrile
solution of 3 containing CsCB11H12. Single-crystal X-ray analysis of 3 confirmed it to
be isostructural with 2, although the weakly diffracting
nature of the crystals precluded detailed analysis of the structural
parameters (Figures S52 and S53).The relative stabilities of 1 and 2 were
probed via subcomponent exchange reactions.[26] A mixture of Co(BF4)2·6H2O
(10.2 equiv per assembly) and 2-formyl-1,10-phenanthroline (20 equiv
per assembly) was added to a solution of 1 in CD3CN, and the mixture was stirred at 333 K for 24 h and then
at 353 K for 72 h. 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixture
showed the disappearance of the diamagnetic signals of 1 followed by the appearance of the paramagnetically shifted signals
of 2. ESI-MS analysis of the resulting mixture indicated
the formation of 2 as the major product in solution,
indicating its greater stability relative to 1. We infer
that the formation of 2 is enthalpically favored as a
consequence of the stronger coordination bonds of the tridentate ligand
arms with CoII in 2 relative to the bidentate
ligand arms with CuI in 1 and also entropically
favored because one molecule of 1 is converted into two
molecules of 2.The potential for guests to intercalate[27] within diamagnetic assemblies 1 and 3 or
for guests to induce an assembly to rearrange into a suitable host[28] was investigated through the addition of the
prospective guests shown in Figure S33.
The assemblies were initially investigated as hosts for corannulene,
inspired both by the interlocked cage structure of 1 and
the observation of corannulene encapsulation inside other polyaromatic
hosts[29] and electron-deficient macrocycles.[30] Addition of corannulene (10 equiv) to CD3CN solutions of 1 or 3 led to shifts
in the signals of the 1H NMR spectra of both the host and
guest, consistent with fast-exchange complexation on the 1H NMR time scale (Figures S34 and S35).The host–guest complexes of 1 and 2 with corannulene were also characterized in the solid state through
single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Crystals of (corannulene)2·1 were obtained from vapor diffusion of diethyl
ether into an acetonitrile solution of 1 saturated with
corannulene. The structure reveals two corannulene molecules stacked
on the externally facing corannulene moieties of 1 at
a distance of 3.71(2) Å (Figure a).
Figure 3
Side views of the cationic parts of the crystal structures
of (a)
(corannulene)2·1 and (b) corannulene·2. Counterions, solvent molecules, and disorder have been
omitted for clarity, and the carbon atoms of the stacked corannulenes
are colored red.
Side views of the cationic parts of the crystal structures
of (a)
(corannulene)2·1 and (b) corannulene·2. Counterions, solvent molecules, and disorder have been
omitted for clarity, and the carbon atoms of the stacked corannulenes
are colored red.Crystals of corannulene·2 were obtained from
vapor diffusion of diethyl ether into an acetonitrile solution of
the triflimide salt of 2 saturated with corannulene and
containing excess tetrabutylammonium perrhenate to aid crystallization.
In this case only a single corannulene was observed to stack with
one of the corannulene moieties of 2, with a refined
occupancy of ca. 0.6 and a distance of 3.57(4) Å between the
stacked rings (Figure b). The close packing of corannulene on the exterior of 2 in the structure of corannulene·2 contrasts with
that observed in the cocrystal of 2 with coronene (Figures S46 and S47), where the cocrystallized
coronene molecules intercalate between ligand arms but do not show
any specific stacking interactions with the [CoII5L2]10+ cation.The binding mode observed
in the solid state is consistent with
the solution NMR data, with the largest shifts in host proton signals
observed for the exo-corannulene protons of 1, consistent with corannulene undergoing stacking interactions
with the exterior of the cage.[22] No interactions
were observed between 1 or 3 and planar
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,[31] CB11H12– anions,[32] or spherical C60, despite the known tendency
for fullerenes to interact with corannulenes[17] and corannulene-based hosts.[15a,33]In summary, a
5-fold interlocked [CuI10L4]10+ [2]catenane, representing a new structure
type, has been prepared from CuI and corannulene-based
subcomponent A. A DFT study revealed the dominant role
of aromatic stacking interactions in driving the formation of the
interlocked structure, which is a common feature[13a,13d] of other interlocked cage systems. This study demonstrates the power
of van der Waals interactions together with coordination-driven assembly
to generate new types of highly complex structures.
Authors: Benjamin R Hall; Lauren E Manck; Ian S Tidmarsh; Andrew Stephenson; Brian F Taylor; Emma J Blaikie; Douglas A Vander Griend; Michael D Ward Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Christopher S Wood; Tanya K Ronson; Ana M Belenguer; Julian J Holstein; Jonathan R Nitschke Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Michal Juríček; Nathan L Strutt; Jonathan C Barnes; Anna M Butterfield; Edward J Dale; Kim K Baldridge; J Fraser Stoddart; Jay S Siegel Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2014-01-26 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Zoe Ashbridge; Stephen D P Fielden; David A Leigh; Lucian Pirvu; Fredrik Schaufelberger; Liang Zhang Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 60.615
Authors: Yong Wu; Qing-Hui Guo; Yunyan Qiu; Jacob A Weber; Ryan M Young; Laura Bancroft; Yang Jiao; Hongliang Chen; Bo Song; Wenqi Liu; Yuanning Feng; Xingang Zhao; Xuesong Li; Long Zhang; Xiao-Yang Chen; Hao Li; Michael R Wasielewski; J Fraser Stoddart Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 12.779