Importance: Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a disabling, globally prevalent disorder representing a well-known and debated clinical problem. Evidence for the most effective treatment strategy is needed. Objective: To compare 3 treatment strategies for MOH. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, randomized clinical trial with 6 months of follow-up was conducted in the tertiary sector at the Danish Headache Center, Glostrup, from October 25, 2016, to June 28, 2019. Of 483 patients with MOH referred during the inclusion period, 195 met the criteria consisting of migraine and/or tension-type headache, 18 years or older, eligibility for outpatient treatment, no severe physical or psychiatric disorder, no other addiction, and not pregnant or breastfeeding. Of these, 75 refused participation and 120 were included. Data were analyzed from July 3 to September 6, 2019. Interventions: Random assignment (1:1:1 allocation) to 1 of the 3 outpatient treatments consisting of (1) withdrawal plus preventive treatment, (2) preventive treatment without withdrawal, or (3) withdrawal with optional preventive treatment 2 months after withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in headache days per month after 6 months. Predefined secondary outcomes were change in monthly migraine days, use of short-term medication, pain intensity, number of responders, patients with remission to episodic headache, and cured MOH. Results:Of 120 patients, 102 (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [11.8] years; 81 women [79.4%]) completed the 6-month follow-up. Headache days per month were reduced by 12.3 (95% CI, 9.3-15.3) in the withdrawal plus preventive group, by 9.9 (95% CI, 7.2-12.6) in the preventive group, and by 8.5 (95% CI, 5.6-11.5) in the withdrawal group (P = .20). No difference was found in reduction of migraine days per month, use of short-term medication, or headache intensity. In the withdrawal plus preventive group, 23 of 31 patients (74.2%) reverted to episodic headache, compared with 21 of 35 (60.0%) in the preventive group and 15 of 36 (41.7%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). Moreover, 30 of 31 patients (96.8%) in the withdrawal plus preventive group were cured of MOH, compared with 26 of 35 (74.3%) in the preventive group and 32 of 36 (88.9%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). These findings corresponded to a 30% (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6) increased chance of MOH cure in the withdrawal plus preventive group compared with the preventive group (P = .03). Conclusion and Relevance: All 3 treatment strategies were effective, but based on these findings, withdrawal therapy combined with preventive medication from the start of withdrawal is recommended as treatment for MOH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993289.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a disabling, globally prevalent disorder representing a well-known and debated clinical problem. Evidence for the most effective treatment strategy is needed. Objective: To compare 3 treatment strategies for MOH. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, randomized clinical trial with 6 months of follow-up was conducted in the tertiary sector at the Danish Headache Center, Glostrup, from October 25, 2016, to June 28, 2019. Of 483 patients with MOH referred during the inclusion period, 195 met the criteria consisting of migraine and/or tension-type headache, 18 years or older, eligibility for outpatient treatment, no severe physical or psychiatric disorder, no other addiction, and not pregnant or breastfeeding. Of these, 75 refused participation and 120 were included. Data were analyzed from July 3 to September 6, 2019. Interventions: Random assignment (1:1:1 allocation) to 1 of the 3 outpatient treatments consisting of (1) withdrawal plus preventive treatment, (2) preventive treatment without withdrawal, or (3) withdrawal with optional preventive treatment 2 months after withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in headache days per month after 6 months. Predefined secondary outcomes were change in monthly migraine days, use of short-term medication, pain intensity, number of responders, patients with remission to episodic headache, and cured MOH. Results: Of 120 patients, 102 (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [11.8] years; 81 women [79.4%]) completed the 6-month follow-up. Headache days per month were reduced by 12.3 (95% CI, 9.3-15.3) in the withdrawal plus preventive group, by 9.9 (95% CI, 7.2-12.6) in the preventive group, and by 8.5 (95% CI, 5.6-11.5) in the withdrawal group (P = .20). No difference was found in reduction of migraine days per month, use of short-term medication, or headache intensity. In the withdrawal plus preventive group, 23 of 31 patients (74.2%) reverted to episodic headache, compared with 21 of 35 (60.0%) in the preventive group and 15 of 36 (41.7%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). Moreover, 30 of 31 patients (96.8%) in the withdrawal plus preventive group were cured of MOH, compared with 26 of 35 (74.3%) in the preventive group and 32 of 36 (88.9%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). These findings corresponded to a 30% (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6) increased chance of MOH cure in the withdrawal plus preventive group compared with the preventive group (P = .03). Conclusion and Relevance: All 3 treatment strategies were effective, but based on these findings, withdrawal therapy combined with preventive medication from the start of withdrawal is recommended as treatment for MOH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993289.
Authors: Stephen D Silberstein; Andrew M Blumenfeld; Roger K Cady; Ira M Turner; Richard B Lipton; Hans-Christoph Diener; Sheena K Aurora; Mai Sirimanne; Ronald E DeGryse; Catherine C Turkel; David W Dodick Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: K Hagen; C Albretsen; S T Vilming; R Salvesen; M Grønning; G Helde; G Gravdahl; J-A Zwart; L J Stovner Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: Judith A Pijpers; Dennis A Kies; Mark A Louter; Erik W van Zwet; Michel D Ferrari; Gisela M Terwindt Journal: Brain Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Henrik W Schytz; Faisal M Amin; Rigmor H Jensen; Louise Carlsen; Stine Maarbjerg; Nunu Lund; Karen Aegidius; Lise L Thomsen; Flemming W Bach; Dagmar Beier; Hanne Johansen; Jakob M Hansen; Helge Kasch; Signe B Munksgaard; Lars Poulsen; Per Schmidt Sørensen; Peter T Schmidt-Hansen; Vlasta V Cvetkovic; Messoud Ashina; Lars Bendtsen Journal: J Headache Pain Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 7.277
Authors: Hans-Christoph Diener; Peter Kropp; Thomas Dresler; Stefan Evers; Stefanie Förderreuther; Charly Gaul; Dagny Holle-Lee; Arne May; Uwe Niederberger; Sabrina Moll; Christoph Schankin; Christian Lampl Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2022-08-29
Authors: Judith A Pijpers; Dennis A Kies; Erik W van Zwet; Frits R Rosendaal; Gisela M Terwindt Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Anna K Eigenbrodt; Håkan Ashina; Sabrina Khan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Dimos D Mitsikostas; Alexandra J Sinclair; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Paolo Martelletti; Anne Ducros; Michel Lantéri-Minet; Mark Braschinsky; Margarita Sanchez Del Rio; Oved Daniel; Aynur Özge; Ayten Mammadbayli; Mihails Arons; Kirill Skorobogatykh; Vladimir Romanenko; Gisela M Terwindt; Koen Paemeleire; Simona Sacco; Uwe Reuter; Christian Lampl; Henrik W Schytz; Zaza Katsarava; Timothy J Steiner; Messoud Ashina Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 42.937