BACKGROUND: Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is conventionally performed during surgical procedures without or with minimal neuromuscular blockade (NMB) because of its potential interference with signal interpretation. However, full blockade offers increased anesthetic management options and facilitates surgery. Here, the feasibility of TcMEP interpretation was assessed during full NMB in adult neurosurgical patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing cervical or lumbar decompression received a rocuronium bolus producing 95% or greater blockade by qualitative train-of-four at the ulnar nerve. TcMEPs were recorded in bilateral thenar-hypothenar and abductor hallucis muscles. Adequacy of response for reliable signal interpretation was determined on the basis of repeatability and clarity, assessed by coefficient of variation and signal-to-noise ratio, respectively. RESULTS: All patients had at least 3 of 4 measurable TcMEP limb responses present during full NMB, and 70.8% of patients had measurable responses in all 4 limbs. In total, 82.2% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 62.8% of abductor hallucis responses were robust enough for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of clarity. In addition, 97.8% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 79.1% of abductor hallucis responses met the criteria for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of consistency. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and preoperative weakness were not predictive of absent responses during full NMB. CONCLUSIONS: TcMEP interpretation may be feasible under greater levels of NMB than previously considered, allowing for monitoring with greater degrees of muscle relaxation. Consideration for monitoring TcMEP during full NMB should be made on a case-by-case basis, and baseline responses without blockade may predict which patients will have adequate responses for interpretation.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is conventionally performed during surgical procedures without or with minimal neuromuscular blockade (NMB) because of its potential interference with signal interpretation. However, full blockade offers increased anesthetic management options and facilitates surgery. Here, the feasibility of TcMEP interpretation was assessed during full NMB in adult neurosurgical patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing cervical or lumbar decompression received a rocuronium bolus producing 95% or greater blockade by qualitative train-of-four at the ulnar nerve. TcMEPs were recorded in bilateral thenar-hypothenar and abductor hallucis muscles. Adequacy of response for reliable signal interpretation was determined on the basis of repeatability and clarity, assessed by coefficient of variation and signal-to-noise ratio, respectively. RESULTS: All patients had at least 3 of 4 measurable TcMEP limb responses present during full NMB, and 70.8% of patients had measurable responses in all 4 limbs. In total, 82.2% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 62.8% of abductor hallucis responses were robust enough for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of clarity. In addition, 97.8% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 79.1% of abductor hallucis responses met the criteria for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of consistency. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and preoperative weakness were not predictive of absent responses during full NMB. CONCLUSIONS: TcMEP interpretation may be feasible under greater levels of NMB than previously considered, allowing for monitoring with greater degrees of muscle relaxation. Consideration for monitoring TcMEP during full NMB should be made on a case-by-case basis, and baseline responses without blockade may predict which patients will have adequate responses for interpretation.
Authors: Minyu Jian; Bo Ma; Haiyang Liu; Chengwei Wang; Fa Liang; Yang Zhou; Hui Qiao; Ruquan Han Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.006