Mikiko Watanabe1, Renata Risi2, Francesca De Giorgi2, Dario Tuccinardi3, Stefania Mariani2, Sabrina Basciani2, Carla Lubrano2, Andrea Lenzi2, Lucio Gnessi2. 1. Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mikiko.watanabe@uniroma1.it. 2. Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of obesity is soaring all over the world, and Italy is reaching the same pace. Similar to other countries, the Italian healthcare system counts on a three-tier model for obesity care, and each region has freedom in the implementation of guidelines. No national record is currently available to monitor the actual situation throughout the country. PURPOSE: To provide a report of the current status on the availability of specialized public obesity care services in Italy. METHODS: Regional prevalence of obesity was extrapolated from publicly available data. Data on facilities for the management of obesity were retrieved from records provided by national scientific societies. Whenever possible, data was verified through online research and direct contact. RESULTS: We report a north-south and east-west gradient regarding the presence of obesity focused facilities, with an inverse correlation with the regional prevalence of obesity (R = 0.25, p = 0.03). Medical-oriented centers appear homogeneous in the multidisciplinary approach, the presence of a bariatric surgery division, the availability of support materials and groups, with no major difference on follow-up frequency. Surgery-oriented centers have a more capillary territorial distribution than the medically oriented, but not enough data was retrieved to provide a thorough description of their characteristics. CONCLUSION: Obtaining a clear picture of the situation and providing consistent care across the country is a challenging task due to the decentralized organization of regions. We provide a first sketch, reporting that the model is applied unevenly, and we suggest feasible actions to improve the situation in our country and elsewhere. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of obesity is soaring all over the world, and Italy is reaching the same pace. Similar to other countries, the Italian healthcare system counts on a three-tier model for obesity care, and each region has freedom in the implementation of guidelines. No national record is currently available to monitor the actual situation throughout the country. PURPOSE: To provide a report of the current status on the availability of specialized public obesity care services in Italy. METHODS: Regional prevalence of obesity was extrapolated from publicly available data. Data on facilities for the management of obesity were retrieved from records provided by national scientific societies. Whenever possible, data was verified through online research and direct contact. RESULTS: We report a north-south and east-west gradient regarding the presence of obesity focused facilities, with an inverse correlation with the regional prevalence of obesity (R = 0.25, p = 0.03). Medical-oriented centers appear homogeneous in the multidisciplinary approach, the presence of a bariatric surgery division, the availability of support materials and groups, with no major difference on follow-up frequency. Surgery-oriented centers have a more capillary territorial distribution than the medically oriented, but not enough data was retrieved to provide a thorough description of their characteristics. CONCLUSION: Obtaining a clear picture of the situation and providing consistent care across the country is a challenging task due to the decentralized organization of regions. We provide a first sketch, reporting that the model is applied unevenly, and we suggest feasible actions to improve the situation in our country and elsewhere. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health policy; Italy; National health service; Obesity; Public health
Authors: Emily J McAllister; Nikhil V Dhurandhar; Scott W Keith; Louis J Aronne; Jamie Barger; Monica Baskin; Ruth M Benca; Joseph Biggio; Mary M Boggiano; Joe C Eisenmann; Mai Elobeid; Kevin R Fontaine; Peter Gluckman; Erin C Hanlon; Peter Katzmarzyk; Angelo Pietrobelli; David T Redden; Douglas M Ruden; Chenxi Wang; Robert A Waterland; Suzanne M Wright; David B Allison Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Ian D Caterson; Assim A Alfadda; Pernille Auerbach; Walmir Coutinho; Ada Cuevas; Dror Dicker; Carly Hughes; Masato Iwabu; Jae-Heon Kang; Rita Nawar; Ricardo Reynoso; Nicolai Rhee; Georgia Rigas; Javier Salvador; Paolo Sbraccia; Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez; Jason C G Halford Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Luigi Di Lorenzo; Luigi Vimercati; Antonella Pipoli; Nicola Mariano Manghisi; Luisa Lampignano; Antonio Caputi; Luigi De Maria; Roberta Zupo; Giovanni De Pergola Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-11-04
Authors: Fernanda Velluzzi; Jasmine Anedda; Silvia Pisanu; Massimo Dell'Antonia; Andrea Deledda; Alessandro Boi; Caterina Ferreli; Laura Atzori Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2021-11-29
Authors: Dario Tuccinardi; Antonio Di Mauro; Greta Lattanzi; Giovanni Rossini; Lavinia Monte; Ivan Beato; Chiara Spiezia; Maria Bravo; Mikiko Watanabe; Andreea Soare; Shadi Kyanvash; Andrea Armirotti; Sine Mandrup Bertozzi; Amalia Gastaldelli; Claudio Pedone; Yeganeh Manon Khazrai; Paolo Pozzilli; Silvia Manfrini Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 8.128