Literature DB >> 32451931

The predictive value of the HEART and GRACE scores for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain.

Zhenhua Huang1, Keke Wang1, Daya Yang2, Qianlin Gu1, Qiuxia Wei1, Zhen Yang3, Hong Zhan4.   

Abstract

The history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin (HEART) and global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) scoring systems are commonly used to risk stratify patients with chest pain. This study investigated the application of these scores in predicting the short-term risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with chest. A total of 509 patients were analyzed. All patients were followed up for 30 days after visiting our emergency department. At 30 days post-admission, the primary outcome (MACE) was recorded in 92 patients (18.1%), 88 (95.6%) of whom had experienced an acute myocardial infarction. Thirty-seven (40.2%) of the patients with a MACE underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and six patients (6.5%) died. The HEART and GRACE scores were both significantly higher in patients who developed a MACE than in those without (P < 0.05). The HEART and GRACE scores had c-statistic values of 0.811 (95% CI 0.774-0.844) and 0.648 (95% CI 0.603-0.688), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic revealed that the HEART and GRACE scores had values of 8.68 (P = 0.39) and 10.45 (P = 0.11), respectively. The percentages of patients with HEART scores of 0-3, 4-6, and 7-10 were 3.0%, 26.2%, and 46.3%, respectively, in those with a MACE within 30 days. The findings show that while both scoring systems are useful, the HEART score is superior to the GRACE score for predicting the occurrence of MACE within 30 days in patients with chest pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-Day MACE; Acute chest pain; Emergency department; GRACE risk score; HEART risk score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32451931     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02378-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study.

Authors:  A Jacob Six; Louise Cullen; Barbra E Backus; Jaimi Greenslade; William Parsonage; Sally Aldous; Pieter A Doevendans; Martin Than
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Rapid evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Peter S Rahko
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Prospective validation of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction and front door Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk scores in Chinese patients presenting to the ED with chest pain.

Authors:  Colin A Graham; Jannet W M Chan; Cangel P Y Chan; Giles N Cattermole; Timothy H Rainer
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Robert F Riley; Brian C Hiestand; Gregory B Russell; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; Stephanie B Elliott; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-03

6.  Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score.

Authors:  Barbra E Backus; A Jacob Six; Johannes C Kelder; Thomas P Mast; Frederieke van den Akker; E Gijis Mast; Stefan H J Monnink; Rob M van Tooren; Pieter A F M Doevendans
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2010-09

7.  Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Authors:  A J Six; B E Backus; J C Kelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Comparison of three risk stratification rules for predicting patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting to an Australian emergency department.

Authors:  Louise Cullen; Jaimi Greenslade; Christopher J Hammett; Anthony F T Brown; Derek P Chew; Jennifer Bilesky; Martin Than; Arvin Lamanna; Kimberley Ryan; Kevin Chu; William A Parsonage
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.975

9.  A comparison between B-type natriuretic peptide, global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score and their combination in ACS risk stratification.

Authors:  D S C Ang; L Wei; M P C Kao; C C Lang; A D Struthers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Prospective evaluation of the use of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score as a risk stratification tool for chest pain patients admitted to an ED observation unit.

Authors:  Jessica Holly; Matthew Fuller; David Hamilton; Michael Mallin; Kathryn Black; Riann Robbins; Virgil Davis; Troy Madsen
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.469

View more
  1 in total

1.  Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Ke; Yiwei Chen; Xiaoping Wang; Zhiyong Wu; Feng Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.