Juan C Ravell1, Samuel D Chauvin2, Tingyan He3, Michael Lenardo4. 1. Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Division of Intramural Research (DIR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Molecular Development of the Immune System Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, and Clinical Genomics Program, DIR, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518038, China. Hetingyan2017@outlook.com. 4. Molecular Development of the Immune System Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, and Clinical Genomics Program, DIR, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD, USA. Lenardo@nih.gov.
Abstract
"X-linked immunodeficiency with magnesium defect, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and neoplasia" (XMEN) disease is an inborn error of glycosylation and immunity caused by loss of function mutations in the magnesium transporter 1 (MAGT1) gene. It is a multisystem disease that strongly affects certain immune cells. MAGT1 is now confirmed as a non-catalytic subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex and facilitates Asparagine (N)-linked glycosylation of specific substrates, making XMEN a congenital disorder of glycosylation manifesting as a combined immune deficiency. The clinical disease has variable expressivity, and impaired glycosylation of key MAGT1-dependent glycoproteins in addition to Mg2+ abnormalities can explain some of the immune manifestations. NKG2D, an activating receptor critical for cytotoxic function against EBV, is poorly glycosylated and invariably decreased on CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells from XMEN patients. It is the best biomarker of the disease. The characterization of EBV-naïve XMEN patients has clarified features of the genetic disease that were previously attributed to EBV infection. Extra-immune manifestations, including hepatic and neurological abnormalities, have recently been reported. EBV-associated lymphomas remain the main cause of severe morbidity. Unfortunately, treatment options to address the underlying mechanism of disease remain limited and Mg2+ supplementation has not proven successful. Here, we review the expanding clinical phenotype and recent advances in glycobiology that have increased our understanding of XMEN disease. We also propose updating XMEN to "X-linked MAGT1 deficiency with increased susceptibility to EBV-infection and N-linked glycosylation defect" in light of these novel findings.
"X-linked immunodeficiency with magnesium defect, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and neoplasia" (XMEN) disease is an inborn error of glycosylation and immunity caused by loss of function mutations in the magnesium transporter 1 (MAGT1) gene. It is a multisystem disease that strongly affects certain immune cells. MAGT1 is now confirmed as a non-catalytic subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex and facilitates Asparagine(N)-linked glycosylation of specific substrates, making XMEN a congenital disorder of glycosylation manifesting as a combined immune deficiency. The clinical disease has variable expressivity, and impaired glycosylation of key MAGT1-dependent glycoproteins in addition to Mg2+ abnormalities can explain some of the immune manifestations. NKG2D, an activating receptor critical for cytotoxic function against EBV, is poorly glycosylated and invariably decreased on CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells from XMENpatients. It is the best biomarker of the disease. The characterization of EBV-naïve XMENpatients has clarified features of the genetic disease that were previously attributed to EBV infection. Extra-immune manifestations, including hepatic and neurological abnormalities, have recently been reported. EBV-associated lymphomas remain the main cause of severe morbidity. Unfortunately, treatment options to address the underlying mechanism of disease remain limited and Mg2+ supplementation has not proven successful. Here, we review the expanding clinical phenotype and recent advances in glycobiology that have increased our understanding of XMEN disease. We also propose updating XMEN to "X-linked MAGT1 deficiency with increased susceptibility to EBV-infection and N-linked glycosylation defect" in light of these novel findings.
Variable expressivity frequently poses a challenge when trying to generalize the clinical features of rare diseases, but elucidation of the molecular etiology of congenital diseases allows clinicians to tie together variable phenotypes to a common disease pathway. “X-linked immunodeficiency with magnesium defect, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and neoplasia” (XMEN) disease is a combined immunodeficiency (CID) caused by hemizygous loss of function (LOF) mutations in the magnesium transporter 1 gene (MAGT1) located on the X chromosome [1-4]. Additional cases have recently been reported, expanding the clinical phenotype and shedding light on previously unrecognized features of the disease[4-12]. Advances in glycobiology have revealed that MAGT1deficiency is a selective congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDG) that predominantly affects the immune system[4, 13]. Herein, we review the most up-to-date scientific and clinical evidence of this fascinating yet complex disease. We also propose updating the XMEN acronym to “X-linked MAGT1 deficiency with increased susceptibility to EBV-infection and N-linked glycosylation defect” to better reflect these new findings.
Epidemiology and genetics
A total of 36 unique male patients have been reported [2–8, 10–12, 14, 15]. Females with heterozygous MAGT1 mutations are healthy carriers with a pattern of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) skewed towards the normal allele in their hematopoietic cells [1, 11, 12]. The disease appears to have complete penetrance with variable expressivity. MAGT1 has 10 exons, is located on chromosome Xq21.1, and predicted to have multiple in-frame translation initiation sites with the predominant form encoding a 335 amino acid (AA) protein (UniProtKB-Q9H0U3). Most deleterious MAGT1 variants abolish protein expression (Table 1) [4].
Table 1:
Reported deleterious MAGT1 molecular alterations
Mutation
Confirmation
References
cDNA
Protein
WB
NKG2D
c.97A>T
p.M33L
N/A
↓*
[12]
c.110G>A
p.W37X
Undetectable
↓
[3, 4]
c.223C>T
p.Q75X
Undetectable
↓
[4, 15]
c.236G>A
p.W79X
Undetectable
↓
[4]
c.409C>T
p.R137X
Undetectable
↓
[3, 4, 10]
c.414C>A
p.Y138X
Undetectable
↓
[4]
c.472del
p.D158MfsX6
N/A
↓
[8]
c.555dup
p.Y186IfsX2
Undetectable
↓
[4, 7]
c.598delC
p.R200GfsX13
Undetectable
↓
[3, 4]
c.712C>T
p.R238X
Undetectable
↓
[4, 5, 10]
c.737_738insGA
p.F246LfsX18
N/A
↓
[15]
c.771T>A
p.C257X
N/A
↓*
[12]
c.774delT
p.F258LfsX5
Undetectable
↓
[4]
c.859_997del139
p.N287X
Undetectable
↓
[3, 4]
c.901_902insAA
p.T301KfsX14
Undetectable
↓
[4, 10]
c.938T>G
p.L313X
Undetectable
↓
[11]
c.991C>T
p.R331X
Undetectable
↓
[4, 11]
c.1068A>C
p.K356N
Normal
N/A
[11]
Partial gene deletion introns 1–8
N/A
Undetectable
↓
[4]
Partial gene deletion exons 2–10
N/A
Undetectable
↓
[6]
Partial gene deletion exons 3–10
N/A
Undetectable
↓
[4]
WB: detection of MAGT1 protein by immunoblotting. NKG2D: surface expression of NKG2D on CD8+ T cells and/or NK cells by flow cytometry. N/A: data not available.
No direct comparison to healthy controls.
MAGT1: a putative magnesium transporter.
Mg2+ is the second most abundant intracellular cation after potassium and is essential for numerous biological functions [16]. MAGT1 was first identified as a gene transcript upregulated in mouse kidney cells cultured in low magnesium [17]. Electrophysiological studies using patch clamping revealed that expression of humanMAGT1 in Xenopus oocytes mediates a very specific Mg2+ uptake[17]. However, MAGT1 has little similarity to any known cation transporter and rather shares a 66% AA sequence homology with the humanTumor Suppressor Candidate 3 protein (TUSC3), a member of the oligosaccharyl transferase (OST) complex responsible for the asparagine(N)-linked glycosylation (NLG)[18, 19]. MAGT1 and TUSC3 are the human homolog of the yeastOST subunits OST3/6[20]. Both proteins can rescue the growth arrest of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain alr1Δ, a yeast lacking the ALR1 Mg2+ transporter, which only proliferate at high concentrations of extracellular magnesium, suggesting overlapping functions between MAGT1 and TUSC3[18]. Similarly, MAGT1 partially rescues survival and proliferation of a chicken B-cell line (DT40) lacking the Mg2+ channel “Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 7” (TRPM7)[21]. Early studies on XMENpatients suggested that loss of MAGT1 resulted in a decreased free intracellular Mg2+ concentration [Mg2+] and impaired T-cell receptor (TCR)-induced transient Mg2+ influx, but the specificity of the fluorescent Mg2+ indicators has been questioned [1, 2]. The molecular relationship to OST subunits and complexities of Mg2+ investigation suggested that key manifestations of disease could revolve around defective glycosylation in addition to or instead of alterations of Mg2+ transport.
MAGT1: a subunit of the OST complex.
Protein glycosylation is an essential co-translational and post-translational process by which carbohydrates (glycans) are covalently attached to proteins, including at least 50% of the human proteome[22]. Glycans play an essential role in the maturation, stability, localization, and function of glycoproteins, a large number of which play critical roles in normal immune function[23]. In humans, the predominant form of protein glycosylation is NLG, a multistep process that covalently attaches glycans to asparagine residues in proteins. First, a lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) is synthesized from monosaccharide units in the cytosol and ER. This LLO is then transferred to the nascent protein in the ER. Finally, the glycan is processed and further modified in the ER and Golgi apparatus (Figure 1) [24-27]. Although early studies placed it as a plasma membrane protein, it was more recently revealed that MAGT1 mainly localizes in the endoplasmic reticulum and is a non-catalytic subunit of the OST complex[13, 18, 28]. Each OST complex contains several accessory subunits, non-covalently associated to an enzymatic subunit, either STT3A or STT3B, which catalyzes the transfer of the pre-assembled glycans from the LLO onto asparagine residues of nascent polypeptides with the AA sequence “Asparagine-X-Serine or Threonine” (N-X-S/T), where X is any amino acid except proline [24, 28–30] (Figure 1). STT3A functions co-translationally, whereas STT3B acts post-translationally and glycosylates sites that were skipped by STT3A[31-33]. Either MAGT1 or TUSC3 can associate with the STT3B-OST complex in a mutually exclusive way and facilitate the NLG of a subset of STT3B-dependent glycoproteins (Figure 1)[28]. Both MAGT1 and TUSC3 have a thioredoxin (TRX) domain containing a bi-cysteine motif (CXXC) and four transmembrane (TM) regions[13, 18, 19]. Although described as necessary for disulfide-mediated cross-linking to certain STT3B-dependent peptide substrates, CXXC deletion did not impair MAGT1-dependent glycosylation in a tumor cell line model system[13, 28]. Importantly, expression of TUSC3 in cells devoid of MAGT1 is able to rescue the glycosylation defect of MAGT1-dependent glycoproteins, which demonstrates functional redundancy between MAGT1 and TUSC3[13, 28]. This compensatory capacity suggests that the clinical phenotype resulting from loss of either MAGT1 or TUSC3 could mainly depend on their differential tissue expression. We have shown that immune cells do not express TUSC3 and exclusively rely on MAGT1 to facilitate NLG of specific STT3B-dependent glycoproteins, which explains why XMENpatients have a predominantly immunological phenotype[13]. However, a few other tissues, including the liver, predominantly express MAGT1 over TUSC3, potentially explaining some of the non-immune findings like liver disease[13].
Figure 1:
MAGT1 is a facilitator of N-linked glycosylation.
A dolichol-linked glycan precursor is assembled from monosaccharides units and en block transferred to proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by either STT3A or STT3B, which are the catalytic subunits of the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex. Either MAGT1 or TUSC3 associate with the STT3B-containing OST complex. Other accessory subunits common to both STT3A- and STT3B-OST complexes are not shown for simplicity. STT3A and STT3B catalyze the transfer of the pre-assembled glycans co-translationally and post-translationally, respectively. The transferred glycan is then further processed and modified in the ER and Golgi apparatus.
XMEN disease: the biochemistry of a selective CDG.
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of more than 130 monogenic diseases that cause abnormal glycosylation[34, 35]. While their clinical manifestations and severity are variable, neurodevelopmental abnormalities, intellectual disability (ID), failure to thrive and liver disease are commonly observed [36-38]. Analysis of serum transferrin glycosylation status (carbohydrate deficient transferrin, CDT), has historically been used as a screening and classification tool for CDG that affect NLG. Transferrin is mainly produced by hepatocytes and has two N-linked glycosylation sites with two negatively charged sialic acids each [39]. Defects that affect the assembly or transfer of the glycan produce a Type-I CDT pattern, and those that affect their downstream processing a Type-II pattern[40, 41]. XMENpatients have a Type-I CDT pattern with minor defects in final processing (Type-II), supporting the role of MAGT1 as a facilitator of NLG[4, 11]. Furthermore, in vitro studies using fibroblasts from patients with deleterious MAGT1 variants revealed a glycosylation defect in only STT3B-dependent glycoproteins[11]. Interestingly, impaired glycosylation was more pronounced in cells from a patient that expressed a mutant MAGT1 protein compared with those with absent MAGT1 expression[11]. An important link between immune deficiency and NLG in XMEN became apparent with our observation that the decreased expression of the activator receptor “Natural-Killer Group 2, member D” (NKG2D) and other important immune molecules was due to impaired glycosylation [4]. Because NK and CD8+ T cells do not express TUSC3, loss of MAGT1 results in a partially glycosylated NKG2D protein that is degraded in cells from XMENpatients[4]. Quantitative glycoproteomic analysis revealed that surprisingly few glycoproteins are differentially glycosylated in lymphocytes from XMENpatients [4]. Similar to studies in the yeastOST3/6 knock out, the affected peptides in XMEN had an inverted NXS/NXT ratio, showing that MAGT1 preferentially facilitates glycosylation of peptides with NXS motifs[4, 42, 43]. While most of the affected glycosites in XMEN were predicted to be STT3B-dependent, a small proportion were STT3A-dependent, and most (62 %) were within 60 amino acids of a TM domain[4]. These results demonstrate the importance of MAGT1 in NLG and hint at a model in which MAGT1 helps the OST complexes target glycosites near a TM region. The differentially glycosylated peptides in XMEN lymphocytes mapped to 73 unique genes that encode proteins important for immunity, neural function, glycosylation, transport, adhesion, immunity, and lipid metabolism[4]. Because the glycoproteomics analysis was only carried out in T lymphocytes, it is likely that there is a broader range of intracellular proteins in different cell types with defective glycosylation in the absence of MAGT1. In lymphocytes, defective glycosylation was observed for key immune proteins including the T cell receptor α and β chains (TCR-α/β), the costimulatory molecules CD28 and CD70, the major histocompatibility complex protein HLADRB1, the ceramide synthase 2 (CERS2) and the Solute Carrier Family 4 Member 7 (SLC4A7) proteins[4]. Hypoglycosylation correlated with decreased surface expression for some (NKG2D, CD28, CD70 and HLA-DRB) but not all (TCR-α/β) glycoproteins (Figure 2)[4]. Although most differentially glycosylated proteins had decreased glycosylation compared with healthy controls, a few glycoproteins were hyperglycosylated[4]. Transfection of lymphocytes from XMENpatients with MAGT1 mRNA rescued the glycosylation defects confirming the direct role of MAGT1 as facilitator of NLG[4]. Additional glycoproteomic analyses in saliva and plasma also revealed defective glycosylation in XMEN[13]. In plasma, the Ig heavy chain, haptoglobin, and hemoglobin showed decreased glycosylation; while in saliva, the heavy chain of IgA, lactoperoxidase, prolactin-inducible protein, and haptoglobin were hypoglycosylated in XMEN[13]. Transcriptome analysis of CD8+ T cells done to assess the effect of defective glycosylation in gene expression patterns, showed that the CD28 pathway was strongly inhibited in XMEN[13]. This is consistent with the reduced glycosylation and decreased surface expression of CD28 in XMEN cells[4, 13]. Mg2+ is an essential cofactor for many enzymes, and lymphocytes from healthy individuals cultured in Mg2+-deprived media have decreased glycosylation and surface expression of MAGT1-dependent glycoproteins[13]. In vitro and in vivo studies on a few XMENpatients showed that Mg2+ supplementation partially recovered NKG2D expression, which translated to better cytotoxic function against EBV, but lack of response has also been reported [2, 12]. Unfortunately, Mg2+ supplementation does not appear to be a useful and effective clinical intervention in XMEN disease as originally hypothesized[2, 12, 44]. Recent discoveries support the critical role of MAGT1 in NLG and a key role for this pathway in disease pathogenesis, but we don’t yet understand how defective NLG and Mg2+ transport are related in this disease.
Figure 2:
Defective glycosylation of key immune molecules and pathogenesis of XMEN disease.
Immune cells, including CD8+ T lymphocytes, do not express TUSC3 and rely exclusively on MAGT1 to facilitate the N-linked glycosylation of some specific STT3B-substrates. Loss of MAGT1 in XMEN lymphocytes results in underglycosylation of key immune molecules, including NKG2D, CD28, CD70, and the T-cell receptor (TCR). In healthy individuals, these fully glycosylated proteins are normally expressed. In XMEN disease, decreased glycosylation of some molecules leads to their degradation resulting in their loss or decreased surface expression as is the case for NKG2D, CD28, and CD70. Other glycoproteins, such as the TCR, although hypoglycosylated in XMEN disease, are still expressed on the cell surface. Loss of NKG2D and CD70 expression impairs the cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes against EBV-infected B cells and result in increased risk of EBV-associated lymphoproliferation and lymphoma in XMEN disease.
Clinical manifestations
The most common clinical features in XMEN are summarized in Figure 3, and a more thorough system-by-system discussion follows.
Figure 3:
Clinical and laboratory findings in XMEN disease.
The percentage of all XMEN patients who presented with the given clinical manifestations (A) and laboratory findings (B). For clinical manifestations, the percentage of all reported patients with each phenotype is given. For the laboratory findings, only the percentage of patients who have had testing reported are shown. The number of patients reported with each symptom out of the number of patients tested is given for each. Bars are color coded for the prevalence of that finding in XMEN disease; red is 80–100 %, orange is 60–79 %, yellow is 40–59 %, green is 20–39 %, and blue is ≤ 19 %.
Immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation
XMEN disease is a CID characterized by increased susceptibility to chronic EBV infection and EBV-associated lymphoproliferation, sinopulmonary and ear infections, lymphadenopathy (LAD), dysgammaglobulinemia, and autoimmune cytopenias. XMEN may have a more indolent course than other combined immunodeficiencies (CID) with some patients not receiving a diagnosis until adulthood[4, 45]. EBV is a widely disseminated oncogenic B cell-tropic γ−herpesvirus that infects some children and the majority of adults worldwide[46-49]. The identification of EBV-naïve patients revealed that the immune phenotype of EBV-naïve and EBV-infectedpatients is very similar[4]. Invariably, all patients have decreased NKG2D expression on both natural killer (NK) and CD8+ T cells, making it the best biomarker and a hallmark of the disease [4]. Mostpatients have decreased serum IgG and IgA with impaired response to polysaccharide antigens, and frequent ear and sinopulmonary infections, sometimes associated with bronchiectasis[4]. Similar to Magt1-knockout mice, XMENpatients often have elevated B cells with a significant expansion of the naïve subset[4, 50]. Low CD4/CD8 ratio and elevated CD4−CD8−TCRαβ+ T (αβDNT) cells are commonly observed, while recent thymic emigrants, NK and natural killer T (NKT) cell counts are usually normal[4]. Almost half of the patients have CD4 T cell lymphopenia, but life-threatening opportunistic infections are rare in the absence of concomitant immunosuppressive treatment[4]. An infant with severe pneumonia had Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus in the bronchoalveolar lavage[15]. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) was reported in one XMENpatient during chemotherapy for an underlying lymphoma[5]. Severe molluscum contagiosum occurs in about one-third of the patients, while skin warts are less frequently observed[4]. Condyloma accuminatum requiring surgical excision was reported in one young adult[4]. Varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections have also been reported[3, 12, 15]. Mild, sometimes transient, thrombocytopenia is a common hematological abnormality, even in patients with no splenomegaly and no history of autoimmune (AI) cytopenias[4]. Transient neutropenia with or without associated mouth sores is present in more than half of the patients[4]. A leukemoid reaction was reported in an EBV-naïve infant with no clonal lymphoproliferative disorder[4]. A significant hemorrhagic risk, usually disproportionate for the degree of thrombocytopenia and involving mucosal sites, has been identified in some patients[10, 15]. This bleeding risk appears to be a relatively common and severe complication after allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT) in XMEN, for which a precise mechanism has not been identified[10]. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and/or immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) occur in about one third of the patients and have been the presenting symptom in some EBV-naïve patients[4]. Lymphocytes from XMENpatients have decreased calcium flux and phospholipase C-gamma 1 (PLCγ1) activation, and impaired re-stimulation induced cell death upon TCR crosslinking, likely due to impaired signaling through the hypoglycosylated TCR and CD28[1, 4]. Interestingly, Magt1-knockout mice show no defects in their T cell activation, but have hyper-activation of their B cells[50]. Unlike humans, mice express TUSC3 in their immune cells, which may account for some of these differences[51]. Both CD8+ T cells and NK cells of XMENpatients have impaired EBV-specific cytotoxic function in vitro, consistent with the persistent EBV viremia in mostpatients and decreased glycosylation of NKG2D and CD70 (Figure 2) [2, 4].
Non-malignant lymphoproliferation
Prior to the identification of EBV-naïve patients, it was thought that the observed lymphadenopathy (LAD) in XMEN was primarily due to EBV-infection. However, we recently reported that LAD was also frequently seen in EBV-naïve patients while splenomegaly was mostly observed in about 50% of the EBV-infectedpatients[4]. In our NIH cohort, mostpatients have mild LAD involving the cervical, axillary, intra-abdominal, and/or inguinofemoral lymph nodes bilaterally. Histopathological examination of lymph node (LN) biopsies from two EBV-naïve children were consistent with Castleman disease, with an atypical B cell population co-expressing the CD5 marker identified in one of these cases[4, 12]. Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia has been observed in LN biopsies from both EBV-naïve and EBV-infectedpatients[4]. Follicular hyperplasia with or without atypical lymphoid proliferation, and increased number of EBV-positive cells have been reported in LN, tonsillar and adenoidal tissue biopsies from EBV-infected individuals[4]. Histopathology of the terminal ileum of an EBV-infectedpatient showed reactive mucosal lymphoid follicles[4]. An atypical perivascular EBV+ lymphoproliferative cutaneous lesion was also recently reported in a young adult with a history of multiple EBV-associated lymphomas[12].
Malignancies
Twelve patients have developed either lymphoma or EBV-positive lymphoproliferative disease (EBV+LPD) (Table 2). Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is the most common malignancy in XMENpatients. EBV-positive LPD, Burkitt’s lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have also been reported. The age at diagnosis ranges from 7 to 57 years, with most cases occurring in the second and third decades of life. Five patients experienced more than one malignancy. Few EBV-negative cancers have been reported. A 27-year-old male with a history of CHL who was successfully treated with chemo- and radio- therapy subsequently developed an EBER-negative liposarcoma[4, 10]. One child with CD4-lymphopenia developed human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8)-positive Kaposi sarcoma (KS)[6]. Although EBV has been implicated in the pathogenesis of other malignancies, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and gastric cancer, these have not been observed in XMEN.
Table 2:
Cancer Predisposition in XMEN disease
ID
Age at cancer diagnosis
Currentage
Type
EBV viremia
EBER (tumor)
Outcome
B.1[3]
45
45†
Lymphoma
+
N/A
Deceased after HSCT
D.1[3, 10]
12
20†
EBV-positive LPD of the hypothalamus*
+
+
CR (7 years), deceased after HSCT
E.1[3]
7, 13
22
Burkitt’s lymphoma
+
+
CR (9 years)
F.1[3]
17, 22
23†
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
N/A
Deceased after HSCT
I.2[10]
13
31
EBV-positive LPD of the palate*
+
+
CR, Alive after HSCT (>1 year)
27
Liposarcoma
-
I.1[5]
52
58†
EBV-positive LPD
+
N/A
Deceased after chemotherapy
57
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
K.2
15
15
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
+
In treatment
M.2[10]
16
18
EBV positive LPD*
+
+
Alive after HSCT
(>1 year)
N.1
29
49
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
N/A
CR (20 years)
R1 [7]
15
18†
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
N/A
CR (3 years), deceased after HSCT
[6]
5
N/A
Kaposi sarcoma
+
N/A
CR at age 6[‡]
9
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
N/A
[12]
21
31
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
+[§]
Alive
26
Burkitt’s lymphoma
+[§]
[15]
15
15
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
+
N/A
Alive
ID: patient identifier. Patients listed with a letter followed by a number have been previously reported by our group[4]. N/A not available. HSCT: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CR: complete remission. Number of years in CR or after HSCT is shown in parenthesis.
Although no lymphoma was detected, given the severity of the disease EBV-positive LPD is included in this table.
Age at death.
Reported as “EBV positivity.”
Patients clinical condition at the time of publication.
Liver disease
Asymptomatic transient elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are common in XMEN and were observed in all of our patients[4]. Although some patients have sustained transaminase elevations, mostpatients have fluctuations in their liver enzymes, including determinations within the normal range. This is true for both EBV-naïve and EBV-infectedpatients. None of the patients in our NIH cohort had impaired hepatic function, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels were mostly normal, and hepatitis serologies were all negative[4]. Although autoimmune hepatitis (AH) has been reported for one case, we did not find any serologic or histopathological evidence of AH in a larger cohort of patients [4, 45]. Varying degrees of inflammation, fibrosis, hepatosteatosis, iron deposition, and diffuse glycogenosis were seen in both EBV-infected and EBV-naïve patients[4]. Hepatic biopsies from patients with EBV viremia did not show a pattern of injury consistent with EBV-associated hepatitis and were Epstein-Barr encoding region (EBER) negative[4]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the liver abnormalities in XMEN are not related to EBV-infection and may be secondary to the underlying NLG defect [4].
Neurological and cognitive abnormalities
The association of MAGT1 with intellectual disability (ID) has been a matter of controversy for years. Pathogenic variants in TUSC3 have been linked to autosomal recessive intellectual disability and developmental delay[52-54]. The identification of a MAGT1 variant that co-segregated with ID in a family with 5 siblings suggested that deleterious variants in MAGT1 could be a cause of X-linked ID[54]. However, this variant (later referred to as c.1028C>T, pV343G) was subsequently found to be relatively common in the general population and highly unlikely to be disease-causing[55]. Recently, a boy with the MAGT1 missense mutation c.1068A>C, p.K356N presented with intellectual and developmental disability[11]. In contrast to all other reported pathogenic MAGT1 genetic alterations that result in complete loss of protein expression, this variant encoded a mutant protein with normal expression[11]. The authors hypothesized that expression of this non-functional protein could prevent incorporation of TUSC3 in the STT3B-OST complex[11]. Because the brain expresses TUSC3, this could account for the ID observed in this patient though NKG2D expression (not reported) would be needed for further functional validation. Another child with a c.991C>T, p.R331XMAGT1 mutation, which results in complete loss of protein expression, was also described to have intellectual and developmental disability[11]. However, two other patients from unrelated families and an immunodeficiency phenotype had the same MAGT1 mutation but no ID[4]. Cognitive and language delay was also described in a child with immunodeficiency and a large MAGT1 gene deletion extending to the proximity of the ATRX promoter, a gene associated with ID[6]. In a large cohort of XMENpatients with LOF MAGT1 mutations resulting in complete loss of protein expression, ID was not observed[4]. These findings suggest that complete loss of MAGT1 alone is unlikely to cause ID whereas expression of non-functional MAGT1 mutants may contribute to ID.We recently reported a 30-year-old patient with a pathogenic variant in MAGT1 (c.414C>A, p.Y138X) and no history of malignancy who developed progressive neurological decline with marked brain, cerebellar, and spinal cord atrophy as a young adult[4]. Although the presenting symptoms were neurological, the immune phenotype was consistent with XMEN[4]. This prompted us to further investigate the prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities in XMEN. In our NIH cohort, 7 additional patients had brain imaging done by either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scans. Two patients in their fifth decade of life had brain atrophy greater than expected for age, and two patients had white matter abnormalities consistent with leukoencephalopathy but all of them had received chemotherapy for treatment of an underlying EBV-associated malignancy[4]. A 52-year-old patient with MRI findings suggestive of posterior reversible encephalopathic syndrome (PRES) secondary to chemotherapy for EBV+LPD, had persistence of the brain MRI changes and associated atrophy 4 years later[5]. A 10-year old boy had strokes secondary to right middle cerebral artery vasculitis[12]. Three NIH patients have had seizures[4]. Acute immune-mediated polyneuropathy or Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) has been reported in 4 patients, including an EBV-naïve individual[4, 7]. Interestingly, half of the patients with brain imaging in our cohort had cavum septum pellucidum (CSP), a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled space between the leaflets of the septum pellucidum that is normally present until 3–6 months of age and is only found in approximately 15% of the adult population[4]. These findings suggest that neurological abnormalities in XMEN may be more prevalent than previously recognized. Finally, asymptomatic elevations in creatine phosphokinase (CPK), sometimes exacerbated by exercise, have also been observed[4].
Diagnosis and treatment
XMEN disease should be suspected in male patients with recurrent ear and sinopulmonary infections, LAD with or without splenomegaly, chronic EBV-infection, EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease, and autoimmunity. A positive family history of immunodeficiency or lymphoma in maternal male relatives reinforces the clinical suspicion. Although mostpatients have persistent EBV viremia after infection, a growing number of EBV-naïve patients, mostly young children, have been identified, and the absence of EBV viremia does not rule out the disease. Determination of NKG2D expression on CD16+CD56+ NK cells and/or CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry should be done in all patients suspected of having XMEN. The CDT test, although not specific, is a widely available clinical test that could be used in places where NKG2D expression determination is not available or to reinforce the diagnosis of XMEN disease. Conversely, male patients with a suspected CDG, including mild ID and/or liver disease, and a CDT isoform analysis most consistent with a mild type I pattern should be evaluated for XMEN disease. Although rare, it seems prudent to consider XMEN disease in the differential diagnosis of male patients with neurodegeneration, especially if associated with immune deficiency or EBV viremia. Both ionized and total serum magnesium concentrations are usually normal and play no role in the diagnosis of XMEN disease. Notably, CD70 deficiency and some malignancies may also decrease NKG2D expression[56, 57]. Therefore, molecular testing to identify genetic alterations in MAGT1 should be performed when the clinical suspicion is high and to confirm the diagnosis in patients with decreased NKG2D expression.A growing number of inborn errors of immunity have been associated with increased predisposition to EBV-associated LPD and should be considered in the differential diagnosis. These include SH2D1A (SAP), XIAP, ITK, CD27, CD70, NFκB1, CTPS1, RASGRP1, and CORO1A deficiencies, which are reviewed elsewhere[58, 59]. The combination of LAD, AI cytopenias, and elevated αβDNT present in a subset of XMENpatients resembles autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), a disease of defective FAS-mediated apoptosis[4, 7, 60]. We recently showed that, in contrast to ALPS, XMENpatients do not have the commonly observed serum elevations in FasL, IL-10, IL-18, and vitamin B12; and XMEN αβDNT cells do not have increased expression of the CD45R (B220) marker as do their ALPS counterparts[4].Management of XMENpatients should be individualized based on clinical manifestations. Mostpatients have mild disease and live a normal lifestyle. We routinely check EBV serologies to assess pastinfection, and EBV viral load by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in whole blood to determine and follow-up viremia. A thorough initial evaluation aimed at establishing baseline disease status is an important part in the management of XMEN disease. In addition to assessing LAD and/or splenomegaly, we advocate for a thorough initial pulmonary, hepatic, and neurological evaluation. Prophylactic antibiotics and Ig replacement therapy significantly improve ear and sinopulmonary infections. We approach the AI cytopenias in XMEN similarly to their ALPS counterparts and advise against splenectomy[61]. We do not recommend anti-CD20 therapy with rituximab for EBV control in the absence of EBV-associated B cell malignancy. While rituximab can deplete B cells from peripheral blood and lower the viral load, it does not eliminate B cells from the tissues. Recurrent treatment with rituximab in other immune deficiencies has sometimes selected for CD20−EBV+ B cells, which could give raise to B-cell malignancies not amenable to anti-CD20 therapy[62]. Furthermore, rituximab has been associated with some cases of PML in primary immunodeficiencies, including XMEN[5, 63]. The identification of EBV-naïve patients raises multiple questions about preventive strategies for this population. There is no FDA-approved EBV vaccine though candidates are currently under investigation. Ig replacement and antivirals do not prevent EBV infection. The role of magnesium supplementation is currently being investigated in a clinical trial[64]. Gene therapy is not available yet. Allogenic BMT has been successful in a few patients, but the post-transplant mortality remains high[10, 12]. It is also unclear whether restoration of normal immune function alone may prevent the non-immune manifestations.
Conclusions
XMEN is a monogenic disease caused by deleterious molecular alteration in MAGT1 and has a variable clinical phenotype. Several recent studies have increased our understanding of the disease manifestations and pathogenesis. With the identification of EBV-naïve patients, we learned that there is an underlying cellular and clinical phenotype that is not just a response to chronic EBV-infection. The larger number of reported cases have revealed that XMEN is a multisystem disease. The recognition of MAGT1 as a facilitator of NLG has provided a new perspective of XMEN as a CDG that predominantly manifests as a CID. However, the precise mechanism by which MAGT1 is involved in the homeostasis of Mg2+ and how this affects the glycosylation defect requires further investigation. We look forward to future work aimed at restoring the NLG defect in this complex disease.
Authors: Sonia S Majri; Jill M Fritz; Alejandro V Villarino; Lixin Zheng; Chrysi Kanellopoulou; Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande; Juha Grönholm; Julie E Niemela; Behdad Afzali; Matthew Biancalana; Stefania Pittaluga; Ashleigh Sun; José L Cohen; Steven M Holland; John J O'Shea; Gulbu Uzel; Michael J Lenardo Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Florence Molinari; François Foulquier; Patrick S Tarpey; Willy Morelle; Sarah Boissel; Jon Teague; Sarah Edkins; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton; Gillian Turner; Gert Matthijs; Jozef Gecz; Arnold Munnich; Laurence Colleaux Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Laura C Tegtmeyer; Stephan Rust; Monique van Scherpenzeel; Bobby G Ng; Marie-Estelle Losfeld; Sharita Timal; Kimiyo Raymond; Ping He; Mie Ichikawa; Joris Veltman; Karin Huijben; Yoon S Shin; Vandana Sharma; Maciej Adamowicz; Martin Lammens; Janine Reunert; Anika Witten; Esther Schrapers; Gert Matthijs; Jaak Jaeken; Daisy Rymen; Tanya Stojkovic; Pascal Laforêt; François Petit; Olivier Aumaître; Elzbieta Czarnowska; Monique Piraud; Teodor Podskarbi; Charles A Stanley; Reuben Matalon; Patricie Burda; Soraya Seyyedi; Volker Debus; Piotr Socha; Jolanta Sykut-Cegielska; Francjan van Spronsen; Linda de Meirleir; Pietro Vajro; Terry DeClue; Can Ficicioglu; Yoshinao Wada; Ron A Wevers; Dieter Vanderschaeghe; Nico Callewaert; Ralph Fingerhut; Emile van Schaftingen; Hudson H Freeze; Eva Morava; Dirk J Lefeber; Thorsten Marquardt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sanjeev Kiran Gotru; Jesus Gil-Pulido; Niklas Beyersdorf; Andreas Diefenbach; Isabelle C Becker; Timo Vögtle; Katharina Remer; Vladimir Chubanov; Thomas Gudermann; Heike M Hermanns; Bernhard Nieswandt; Thomas Kerkau; Alma Zernecke; Attila Braun Journal: J Immunol Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande; Feng-Yen Li; Geraldine M O'Connor; Marshall J Lukacs; Ping Jiang; Lixin Zheng; Amber Shatzer; Matthew Biancalana; Stefania Pittaluga; Helen F Matthews; Timothy J Jancel; Jack J Bleesing; Rebecca A Marsh; Taco W Kuijpers; Kim E Nichols; Carrie L Lucas; Sunil Nagpal; Huseyin Mehmet; Helen C Su; Jeffrey I Cohen; Gulbu Uzel; Michael J Lenardo Journal: Science Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eline Blommaert; Natalia A Cherepanova; Frederik Staels; Matthew P Wilson; Reid Gilmore; Rik Schrijvers; Jaak Jaeken; François Foulquier; Gert Matthijs Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 5.881
Authors: Julie Brault; Taylor Liu; Ezekiel Bello; Siyuan Liu; Colin L Sweeney; Ronald J Meis; Sherry Koontz; Cristina Corsino; Uimook Choi; Guillaume Vayssiere; Marita Bosticardo; Kennichi Dowdell; Cicera R Lazzarotto; Aaron B Clark; Luigi D Notarangelo; Juan C Ravell; Michael J Lenardo; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Shengdar Q Tsai; Xiaolin Wu; Gary A Dahl; Harry L Malech; Suk See De Ravin Journal: Blood Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 25.476