C Chiesa1, M Mira2, S Bhoori3, G Bormolini3, M Maccauro2, C Spreafico4, T Cascella4, A Cavallo5, M C De Nile6, S Mazzaglia2, A Capozza7, G Tagliabue8, A Brusa9, A Marchianò4, E Seregni2, V Mazzaferro3. 1. Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via G. Venezian 1, Milan, Italy. carlo.chiesa@istitutotumori.mi.it. 2. Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via G. Venezian 1, Milan, Italy. 3. HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 4. Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 5. Medical Physics Unit, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 6. Postgraduate Specialization School in Medical Physics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 7. Postgraduate Specialization School in Nuclear Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 8. Tumour Registry, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 9. Radiation Protection Unit, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is, by all standards, a radiation therapy. As such, according to Euratom Directive 2013/59, it should be optimized by a thorough treatment plan based on the distinct evaluation of absorbed dose to the lesions and to the non-tumoural liver (two-compartment dosimetry). Since the dosimetric prediction with 99mTc albumin macro-aggregates (MAA) of non-tumoural liver is much more accurate than the same prediction on lesions, treatment planning should focus on non-tumoural liver rather than on lesion dosimetry. The aim of this study was to determine a safety limit through the analysis of pre-treatment dosimetry with 99mTc-MAA single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT), in order to deliver the maximum tolerable absorbed dose to non-tumoural liver. METHODS: Data from intermediate/advanced hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with 90Y glass microspheres were collected in this single-arm retrospective study. Injection was always lobar, even in case of bilobar disease, to avoid treating the whole liver in a single session. A three-level definition of liver decompensation (LD) was introduced, considering toxicity only in cases of liver decompensation requiring medical action (LD type C, LDC). We report LDC rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis between LDC and NO LDC absorbed dose distributions, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) curves and uni- and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with toxicity. RESULTS: A 6-month timeline was defined as necessary to capture all treatment-related toxicity events. Previous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), presence or extension of portal vein tumoural thrombosis (PVTT) and tumour pattern (nodular versus infiltrative) were not associated with tolerance to TARE. On the contrary, at the multivariate analysis, the absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver (including the non-injected lobe) was a prognostic indicator correlated with liver decompensation (odds ratio = 4.24). Basal bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dL was a second even more significant risk factor (odds ratio = 6.35). NTCP analysis stratified with this bilirubin cut-off determined a 15% liver decompensation risk at 50 Gy/90 Gy for bilirubin >/< 1.1 mg/dL. These results are valid for a 90Y glass microsphere administration 4 days after the reference time. CONCLUSION: Given the low predictive accuracy of 99mTc-MAA on lesion absorbed dose reported by several authors, an optimized TARE with 90Y glass microspheres with lobar injection 4 days after reference time should aim at an absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver of 50 Gy/90 Gy for basal bilirubin higher/lower than 1.1 mg/dL, respectively.
AIM: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is, by all standards, a radiation therapy. As such, according to Euratom Directive 2013/59, it should be optimized by a thorough treatment plan based on the distinct evaluation of absorbed dose to the lesions and to the non-tumoural liver (two-compartment dosimetry). Since the dosimetric prediction with 99mTc albumin macro-aggregates (MAA) of non-tumoural liver is much more accurate than the same prediction on lesions, treatment planning should focus on non-tumoural liver rather than on lesion dosimetry. The aim of this study was to determine a safety limit through the analysis of pre-treatment dosimetry with 99mTc-MAA single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT), in order to deliver the maximum tolerable absorbed dose to non-tumoural liver. METHODS: Data from intermediate/advanced hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with 90Y glass microspheres were collected in this single-arm retrospective study. Injection was always lobar, even in case of bilobar disease, to avoid treating the whole liver in a single session. A three-level definition of liver decompensation (LD) was introduced, considering toxicity only in cases of liver decompensation requiring medical action (LD type C, LDC). We report LDC rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis between LDC and NO LDC absorbed dose distributions, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) curves and uni- and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with toxicity. RESULTS: A 6-month timeline was defined as necessary to capture all treatment-related toxicity events. Previous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), presence or extension of portal vein tumoural thrombosis (PVTT) and tumour pattern (nodular versus infiltrative) were not associated with tolerance to TARE. On the contrary, at the multivariate analysis, the absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver (including the non-injected lobe) was a prognostic indicator correlated with liver decompensation (odds ratio = 4.24). Basal bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dL was a second even more significant risk factor (odds ratio = 6.35). NTCP analysis stratified with this bilirubin cut-off determined a 15% liver decompensation risk at 50 Gy/90 Gy for bilirubin >/< 1.1 mg/dL. These results are valid for a 90Y glass microsphere administration 4 days after the reference time. CONCLUSION: Given the low predictive accuracy of 99mTc-MAA on lesion absorbed dose reported by several authors, an optimized TARE with 90Y glass microspheres with lobar injection 4 days after reference time should aim at an absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver of 50 Gy/90 Gy for basal bilirubin higher/lower than 1.1 mg/dL, respectively.
Authors: Riad Salem; Siddharth A Padia; Marnix Lam; Carlo Chiesa; Paul Haste; Bruno Sangro; Beau Toskich; Kirk Fowers; Joseph M Herman; S Cheenu Kappadath; Thomas Leung; Daniel Y Sze; Edward Kim; Etienne Garin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-09-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sander C Ebbers; Caren van Roekel; Manon N G J A Braat; Maarten W Barentsz; Marnix G E H Lam; Arthur J A T Braat Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Matthew M Cousins; Theresa P Devasia; Christopher M Maurino; Justin Mikell; Matthew J Schipper; Ravi K Kaza; Theodore S Lawrence; Kyle C Cuneo; Yuni K Dewaraja Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Chiara Romanò; Stefania Mazzaglia; Marco Maccauro; Carlo Spreafico; Alejandro Gabutti; Gabriele Maffi; Carlo Morosi; Tommaso Cascella; Marta Mira; Maria Chiara De Nile; Gianluca Aliberti; Giovanni Argiroffi; Valentina Fuoco; Sherrie Bhoori; Consuelo Zanette; Alfonso Marchianò; Ettore Seregni; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Carlo Chiesa Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: M Weber; M Lam; C Chiesa; M Konijnenberg; M Cremonesi; P Flamen; S Gnesin; L Bodei; T Kracmerova; M Luster; E Garin; K Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Philippe d'Abadie; Stephan Walrand; Renaud Lhommel; Michel Hesse; Ivan Borbath; François Jamar Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos; Cameron J Overfield; S Ali Montazeri; Harris Liou; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Gregory T Frey; J Mark McKinney; Charles A Ritchie; Zlatko Devcic; Andrew R Lewis; Denise M Harnois; Tushar Patel; Beau B Toskich Journal: J Hepatocell Carcinoma Date: 2021-07-30