Literature DB >> 32451604

Radioembolization of hepatocarcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: treatment optimization using the dose-toxicity relationship.

C Chiesa1, M Mira2, S Bhoori3, G Bormolini3, M Maccauro2, C Spreafico4, T Cascella4, A Cavallo5, M C De Nile6, S Mazzaglia2, A Capozza7, G Tagliabue8, A Brusa9, A Marchianò4, E Seregni2, V Mazzaferro3.   

Abstract

AIM: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is, by all standards, a radiation therapy. As such, according to Euratom Directive 2013/59, it should be optimized by a thorough treatment plan based on the distinct evaluation of absorbed dose to the lesions and to the non-tumoural liver (two-compartment dosimetry). Since the dosimetric prediction with 99mTc albumin macro-aggregates (MAA) of non-tumoural liver is much more accurate than the same prediction on lesions, treatment planning should focus on non-tumoural liver rather than on lesion dosimetry. The aim of this study was to determine a safety limit through the analysis of pre-treatment dosimetry with 99mTc-MAA single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT), in order to deliver the maximum tolerable absorbed dose to non-tumoural liver.
METHODS: Data from intermediate/advanced hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with 90Y glass microspheres were collected in this single-arm retrospective study. Injection was always lobar, even in case of bilobar disease, to avoid treating the whole liver in a single session. A three-level definition of liver decompensation (LD) was introduced, considering toxicity only in cases of liver decompensation requiring medical action (LD type C, LDC). We report LDC rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis between LDC and NO LDC absorbed dose distributions, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) curves and uni- and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with toxicity.
RESULTS: A 6-month timeline was defined as necessary to capture all treatment-related toxicity events. Previous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), presence or extension of portal vein tumoural thrombosis (PVTT) and tumour pattern (nodular versus infiltrative) were not associated with tolerance to TARE. On the contrary, at the multivariate analysis, the absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver (including the non-injected lobe) was a prognostic indicator correlated with liver decompensation (odds ratio = 4.24). Basal bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dL was a second even more significant risk factor (odds ratio = 6.35). NTCP analysis stratified with this bilirubin cut-off determined a 15% liver decompensation risk at 50 Gy/90 Gy for bilirubin >/< 1.1 mg/dL. These results are valid for a 90Y glass microsphere administration 4 days after the reference time.
CONCLUSION: Given the low predictive accuracy of 99mTc-MAA on lesion absorbed dose reported by several authors, an optimized TARE with 90Y glass microspheres with lobar injection 4 days after reference time should aim at an absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver of 50 Gy/90 Gy for basal bilirubin higher/lower than 1.1 mg/dL, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; HCC; Microspheres; NTCP; Toxicity; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32451604     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04845-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  14 in total

1.  Dynamic Lymphocyte Changes Following Transarterial Radioembolization: Association with Normal Liver Dose and Effect on Overall Survival.

Authors:  Shamar Young; Ranjan Ragulojan; Ting Chen; Joshua Owen; Donna D'souza; Tina Sanghvi; Jafar Golzarian; Siobhan Flanagan
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-02-04

2.  Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Siddharth A Padia; Marnix Lam; Carlo Chiesa; Paul Haste; Bruno Sangro; Beau Toskich; Kirk Fowers; Joseph M Herman; S Cheenu Kappadath; Thomas Leung; Daniel Y Sze; Edward Kim; Etienne Garin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Dose-Response and Dose-Toxicity Relationships for Glass 90Y Radioembolization in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Dose-response relationship after yttrium-90-radioembolization with glass microspheres in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

Authors:  Sander C Ebbers; Caren van Roekel; Manon N G J A Braat; Maarten W Barentsz; Marnix G E H Lam; Arthur J A T Braat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Pretreatment Levels of Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Predict Toxicity and Overall Survival After 90Y Radioembolization: Potential Novel Application of Biomarkers for Personalized Management of Hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Matthew M Cousins; Theresa P Devasia; Christopher M Maurino; Justin Mikell; Matthew J Schipper; Ravi K Kaza; Theodore S Lawrence; Kyle C Cuneo; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with 90Y Glass Microspheres: No Advantage of Voxel Dosimetry with Respect to Mean Dose in Dose-Response Analysis with Two Radiological Methods.

Authors:  Chiara Romanò; Stefania Mazzaglia; Marco Maccauro; Carlo Spreafico; Alejandro Gabutti; Gabriele Maffi; Carlo Morosi; Tommaso Cascella; Marta Mira; Maria Chiara De Nile; Gianluca Aliberti; Giovanni Argiroffi; Valentina Fuoco; Sherrie Bhoori; Consuelo Zanette; Alfonso Marchianò; Ettore Seregni; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Carlo Chiesa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  M Weber; M Lam; C Chiesa; M Konijnenberg; M Cremonesi; P Flamen; S Gnesin; L Bodei; T Kracmerova; M Luster; E Garin; K Herrmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Optimization of the Clinical Effectiveness of Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Dosimetry and Patient-Selection Criteria.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Stephan Walrand; Renaud Lhommel; Michel Hesse; Ivan Borbath; François Jamar
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 9.  Microspheres Used in Liver Radioembolization: From Conception to Clinical Effects.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Michel Hesse; Amandine Louppe; Renaud Lhommel; Stephan Walrand; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Biochemical Safety of Ablative Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma as a Function of Percent Liver Treated.

Authors:  Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos; Cameron J Overfield; S Ali Montazeri; Harris Liou; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Gregory T Frey; J Mark McKinney; Charles A Ritchie; Zlatko Devcic; Andrew R Lewis; Denise M Harnois; Tushar Patel; Beau B Toskich
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.