| Literature DB >> 32450814 |
Dongdong Bo1,2, Xunping Jiang1,2, Guiqiong Liu3,4, Feng Xu1, Ruixue Hu1, Teketay Wassie1, Yuqing Chong1, Sohail Ahmed1, Chenhui Liu1, Shishay Girmay1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The microscopic process of postnatal testicular development in early-puberty animals is poorly understood. Therefore, in this study, 21 male Yiling goats with average ages of 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days old (each age group comprised three goats) were used to study the changes in organs, tissues and transcriptomes during postnatal testicle development to obtain a broad and deep insight into the dynamic process of testicular transition from growth to spermatogenesis in early-puberty animals.Entities:
Keywords: Early puberty; Phase transition; Spermatogenesis; Testicular growth; Transcriptome
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32450814 PMCID: PMC7249689 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6767-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Body growth and testicular development of Yiling goat. a Fitting of testicular growth. The model for testicular growth was W = 44.5529/(1 + 440.4 × e− 0.0512). W represents testicular weight, and d represents the number of days postpartum (dpp). The age of inflection point was 118.9 dpp. b Fitting of body growth. The model for body growth was W = 13.7439/(1 + 4.5074 × e− 0.0208). W represents body weight, and d represents the dpp. The age of inflection point was 110 dpp. c Body weight and testicular weight of Yiling goat. Mean ± SE; means with different letters are significantly different among ages (P < 0.05). d, e, f Light micrographs of the testis in the Yiling goats at 60 dpp (D, D60), 90 dpp (E, D90) and 120 dpp (F, D120). At 60 dpp (D, D60), no spermatozoa were observed in the seminiferous tubules. At 90 dpp (E, D90), spermatocytes (arrowheads) were observed in the seminiferous tubules. After 90 dpp (F, D120), seminiferous tubules developed larger and many spermatozoa (square area) were seen constantly. HE staining, magnification 40×. Bar indicates 50 μm
Fig. 2The expression profiles of genes. a PCA of 21-pair distinct samples across the seven ages based on normalized mRNAs expression level. The samples were grouped by age. The expression pattern of genes can be divided into three different clusters. The expression profiles of the samples at 90 dpp were separable from those at 0–60 dpp and 120–180 dpp. b Heat map of correlation coefficient for 21 samples based on the gene expression level. The samples were grouped by hierarchical clustering, and the dendrogram was not shown. Information of samples was shown in Additional file 8: Table S20. c Bar plot presentation of DEGs between neighboring age groups. d The Venn diagram shows the numbers of DEGs in D90 vs. D60 and D120 vs. D90. The total and overlay numbers of DEGs are 9098 and 747 respectively. The pie chart shows the changes in the common 747 DEGs
Fig. 3Gene modules identified by WGCNA and functional enrichment of upregulated genes of D90 vs. D60. a Hierarchical cluster dendrogram of upregulated genes of D90 vs. D60 obtained by clustering the dissimilarity based on consensus topological overlap. Modules corresponding to branches were labeled with colors indicated by the color bands underneath the tree. A total of three modules were identified. b Top ten of functional enrichment results for each module. The top ten terms with the lowest FDR were shown in the figure
Fig. 4Co-expression network diagram of genes in M2. The co-expression network was generated by WGCNA analysis. A total number of 214 candidate genes was considered for the analysis and the top 55 with degree higher than 200 was shown. Proteins genes are represented as nodes. Genes with degree higher than 205 were considered as hub genes
The information of hub genes in each module
| Module | Expression | Hub genes |
|---|---|---|
| M1 | upregulated at 90 dpp | |
| M2 | ||
| M3 | ||
| M4 | downregulated at 90 dpp | |
| M5 | ||
| M6 | upregulated at 120 dpp | |
| M7 | downregulated at 120 dpp | |
| M8 | ||
| M9 |
Fig. 5Fuzzy c-means clustering showing the temporal expression patterns of genes. Four patterns (a, b, c and d) were identified based on expression levels in seven developmental stages (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 dpp). The cluster center for each pattern was highlighted as black lines in the plots. Gene number and the results of functional enrichment of each pattern was presented in the plots
The expression of well documented genes which have important roles in male reproduction
| Gene | D90 vs. D60 | D120 vs. D90 |
|---|---|---|
| not significant | upregulated | |
| upregulated | not significant | |
| not significant | upregulated | |
| not significant | upregulated | |
| upregulated | upregulated | |
| not significant | upregulated | |
| upregulated | upregulated | |
| not significant | upregulated |
The expression of genes compared with other studies
| Gene | Expression in reference study | Expression in present study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| upregulated from 2 months old to 4 months old and from 4 months old to 6 months old | upregulated from 60 dpp to 120 dpp and from 120 dpp to 180 dpp | [ | |
| upregulated from 2 months old to 4 months old | upregulated from 60 dpp to 120 dpp | ||
| downregulated from 2 months old to 4 months old | upregulated from 0 dpp to 60 dpp but downregulated from 60 dpp to 120 dpp | ||
| upregulated from infant (6 days postnatal) to juvenile (4 weeks old) | upregulated from 0 dpp to 120 dpp | [ | |
| downregulated from infant (6 days postnatal) to juvenile (4 weeks old) | downregulated from 0 dpp to 120 dpp | [ | |
Fig. 6Validation of microarray results by qPCR analysis. a and c showed the results of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR of DEGs of D90 vs. D60. b and d showed the results of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR of DEGs of D120 vs. D90. The goat ACTB gene was used as reference gene. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). *: p < 0.05. **: p < 0.01. ***: p < 0.001
Primer sequences for qRT-PCR test
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
| GTCACCAACTGGGACGACAT | CATCTTCTCACGGTTGGCCT | |
| GCATGAGGTCCCAGTACGAG | GTAGCGCAGACGCTCAGTAA | |
| TATGAAGGCACTGCTTGCCA | ACAGAACCCTCCAAACCTGC | |
| ATATTCCGGGAGGGAAGGTG | GGTAACCATGGCAACGAAAGC | |
| CATACCAGGCCAACAACTGC | CTGATGAGGAGCTTGCCTGT | |
| AAATGCCCTTCCAGTGGGAC | AGGTGGCATAACGGACCTTG | |
| AGGTGGTGGCATCCATTGAG | ATGATCCAGAAGGCCACTCG | |
| AAGACGTCATTGGCAGAGGAG | GCGACCTGGCGAAGGATATG | |
| GCAGGACAACCACCACCATA | GGTCTTCTTGCTGTCGTCCA | |
| TGGTTTCGGAAGACTTGAGC | ACTTTGCCCCAGTTGGGAAT | |
| GACTACGTGTGCGTGGTGAA | GCTGCAAGTGGCTATCTCCT | |
| GTGAAGAATGGGGAAGCCGA | GTTCGCACACACTGCCATAC |
aGene ACTB was used as the reference gene