| Literature DB >> 32450761 |
Juan Riestra-Ayora1, Joaquin Yanes-Diaz1, Oscar Penuelas2,3, Cristina Molina-Quiros1, Ricardo Sanz-Fernández1, Eduardo Martin-Sanz1.
Abstract
During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, patients in intensive care units who are undergoing long-term intubation may require tracheostomy. There is controversy about indication and health care professionals' safety regarding the conventional or percutaneous technique. We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 27 consecutive patients with COVID-19 comparing both tracheostomy techniques, safety, and prognosis clinical markers. The results show that the techniques are equally safe, without cases of infection in surgeons. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score before surgery and the progression in ventilation support during the first 72 hours after tracheostomy are optimal prognostic markers for these patients.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; airway management; infectious disease; quality improvement; tracheostomy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32450761 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820931801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 0194-5998 Impact factor: 3.497