Literature DB >> 32450364

Long-term Outcome of Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Treatment of Gastroparesis.

Mohamed M Abdelfatah1, Alan Noll1, Neil Kapil1, Rushikesh Shah1, Lianyong Li1, Rosemary Nustas1, Baiwen Li1, Hui Luo1, Huimin Chen1, Liang Xia1, Parit Mekaroonkamol1, Nikrad Shahnavaz1, Steven Keilin1, Field Willingham1, Jennifer Christie1, Qiang Cai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (GPOEM) is a promising treatment for gastroparesis. There are few data on the long-term outcomes of this procedure. We investigated long-term outcomes of GPOEM treatment of patients with refractory gastroparesis.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-series study of all patients who underwent GPOEM for refractory gastroparesis at a single center (n = 97), from June 2015 through March 2019; 90 patients had more than 3 months follow-up data and were included in our final analysis. We collected data on gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) scores (measurements of postprandial fullness or early satiety, nausea and vomiting, and bloating) and SF-36 questionnaire scores (measures quality of life). The primary outcome was clinical response to GPOEM, defined as a decrease of at least 1 point in the average total GCSI score with more than a 25% decrease in at least 2 subscales of cardinal symptoms. Recurrence was defined as a return to baseline GCSI or GCSI scores of 3 or more for at least 2 months after an initial complete response. The secondary outcome was the factors that predict GPOEM failure (no response or gastroparesis recurrence within 6 months).
RESULTS: At initial follow-up (3 to 6 months after GPOEM), 73 patients (81.1%) had a clinical response and significant increases in SF-36 questionnaire scores (indicating increased quality of life) whereas 17 patients (18.9%) had no response. Six months after GPOEM, 7.1% had recurrence. At 12 months, 8.3% of patients remaining in the study had recurrence. At 24 months, 4.8% of patients remaining in the study had a recurrence. At 36 months, 14.3% of patients remaining in the study had recurrence. For patients who experienced an initial clinical response, the rate of loss of that response per year was 12.9%. In the univariate and multivariate regression analysis, a longer duration of gastroparesis reduced the odds of response to GPOEM (odds ratio [OR], 0.092; 95% CI, 1.04-1.3; P = .001). On multivariate logistic regression, patients with high BMIs had increased odds of GPOEM failure (OR, 1.097; 95% CI, 1.022-1.176; P = .010) and patients receiving psychiatric medications had a higher risk of GPOEM failure (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.110-1.008; P = .052).
CONCLUSIONS: In retrospective analysis of 90 patients who underwent GPOEM for refractory gastroparesis, 81.1% had a clinical response at initial follow-up of their procedure. 1 year after GPOEM, 69.1% of all patients had a clinical response and 85.2% of initial responders maintained a clinical response. Patients maintained a clinical response and improved quality of life for as long as 3 years after the procedure. High BMI and long duration gastroparesis were associated with failure of GPOEM.
Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Gastric Emptying; Psychologic; Therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32450364     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic findings do not predict per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) response.

Authors:  Kathryn Schwalbe; Caitlin Finelli; Soon Moon; Hannah Niehaus; Abhiram Kondajji; Chao Tu; Alisan Fathalizadeh; Matthew Kroh; Matthew Allemang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comment on Suresh et al. The Short-Term Effects and Tolerability of Low-Viscosity Soluble Fibre on Gastroparesis Patients: A Pilot Clinical Intervention Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4298.

Authors:  J Wesley Jones; Katrina Lamont; Grace D Brannan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 3.  Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy: Indications, technique, results and comparison with surgical approach.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Verga; Stefano Mazza; Francesco Azzolini; Fabrizio Cereatti; Clara Benedetta Conti; Andrea Drago; Sara Soro; Biagio Elvo; Roberto Grassia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-27

4.  Navigational tunnel technique for gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy: getting straight to the point (pylorus).

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Piotr Sowa; Jason Samarasena; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-10-27

5.  Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Martinek; Rastislav Hustak; Jan Mares; Zuzana Vackova; Julius Spicak; Eva Kieslichova; Marie Buncova; Daniel Pohl; Sunil Amin; Jan Tack
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 31.793

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.