Literature DB >> 32450242

Teaching Clinical Reasoning and Critical Thinking: From Cognitive Theory to Practical Application.

Jeremy B Richards1, Margaret M Hayes1, Richard M Schwartzstein2.   

Abstract

Teaching clinical reasoning is challenging, particularly in the time-pressured and complicated environment of the ICU. Clinical reasoning is a complex process in which one identifies and prioritizes pertinent clinical data to develop a hypothesis and a plan to confirm or refute that hypothesis. Clinical reasoning is related to and dependent on critical thinking skills, which are defined as one's capacity to engage in higher cognitive skills such as analysis, synthesis, and self-reflection. This article reviews how an understanding of the cognitive psychological principles that contribute to effective clinical reasoning has led to strategies for teaching clinical reasoning in the ICU. With familiarity with System 1 and System 2 thinking, which represent intuitive vs analytical cognitive processing pathways, respectively, the clinical teacher can use this framework to identify cognitive patterns in clinical reasoning. In addition, the article describes how internal and external factors in the clinical environment can affect students' and trainees' clinical reasoning abilities, as well as their capacity to understand and incorporate strategies for effective critical thinking into their practice. Utilizing applicable cognitive psychological theory, the relevant literature on teaching clinical reasoning is reviewed, and specific strategies to effectively teach clinical reasoning and critical thinking in the ICU and other clinical settings are provided. Definitions, operational descriptions, and justifications for a variety of teaching interventions are discussed, including the "one-minute preceptor" model, the use of concept or mechanism maps, and cognitive de-biasing strategies.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical reasoning; cognitive bias; critical thinking; education

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32450242     DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Medical Students and the Drive for a Single Right Answer: Teaching Complexity and Uncertainty.

Authors:  Emily E Witt; Sarah E Onorato; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  Applying digital storytelling in the medical oncology curriculum: Effects on students' achievement and critical thinking.

Authors:  Afagh Zarei; Rita Mojtahedzadeh; Aeen Mohammadi; John Sandars; Seyed Amir Hossein Emami
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-29

3.  Teaching Culturally Safe Care in Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Virtual Visits with Indigenous Animators.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Lorrilee McGregor; Danica Desjardins; Kerri Z Delaney; Nicole Bessette; Maurianne Reade
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Building upon the foundational science curriculum with physiology-based grand rounds: a multi-institutional program evaluation.

Authors:  Arielle L Langer; Brian L Block; Richard M Schwartzstein; Jeremy B Richards
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

5.  fNIRS Evaluation of Frontal and Temporal Cortex Activation by Verbal Fluency Task and High-Level Cognition Task for Detecting Anxiety and Depression.

Authors:  Xuenan Lang; Dan Wen; Qiqi Li; Qin Yin; Mingyu Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.