Graham C Chapman1, Emily A Slopnick2, Kasey Roberts2, David Sheyn3, Susan Wherley4, Sangeeta T Mahajan4, Robert R Pollard3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (all authors); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Wherley, and Mahajan); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Sheyn, and Pollard), Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: Gchapman5@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (all authors); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Wherley, and Mahajan); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Sheyn, and Pollard), Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (all authors); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Sheyn, and Pollard), Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (all authors); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Drs. Chapman, Slopnick, Roberts, Wherley, and Mahajan).
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy when performed with uterosacral ligament suspension. DESIGN: Retrospective propensity-score matched cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: We included all patients who had undergone uterosacral ligament suspension and concurrent total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH-USLS) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH-USLS) from 2010 to 2015. We excluded those who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, other surgical procedures for apical pelvic organ prolapse, or had gynecologic malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: We compared 30-day complication rates in patients who underwent TVH-USLS versus TLH-USLS in both the total study population and a propensity score matched cohort. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3,349 patients who underwent TVH-USLS and 484 who underwent TLH-USLS. Patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a significantly higher composite complication rate (11.4% vs 6.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 1.3-2.8; p <.01) and a higher serious complication rate (5.6% vs 3.1%, OR 1.8, 1.1-3.1; p = .02), which excluded urinary tract infection and superficial surgical site infection. The propensity score analysis was performed, and patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio between the TVH-USLS group and the TLH-USLS group. In the matched cohort, patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a higher composite complication rate than those who underwent TLH-USLS (10.3% vs 6.4%, OR 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; p = .04), whereas the rate of serious complications did not differ between the groups (4.3% vs 3.1%, OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .4). On multivariate logistic regression, TVH-USLS remained an independent predictor of composite complications (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.6; p = .04) but not serious complications (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .3). CONCLUSION: In this large national cohort, TVH-USLS was associated with a higher composite complication rate than TLH-USLS, largely secondary to an increased rate of urinary tract infection. After matching, the groups had similar rates of serious complications. These data suggest that TLH-USLS should be viewed as a safe alternative to TVH-USLS.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy when performed with uterosacral ligament suspension. DESIGN: Retrospective propensity-score matched cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: We included all patients who had undergone uterosacral ligament suspension and concurrent total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH-USLS) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH-USLS) from 2010 to 2015. We excluded those who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, other surgical procedures for apical pelvic organ prolapse, or had gynecologic malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: We compared 30-day complication rates in patients who underwent TVH-USLS versus TLH-USLS in both the total study population and a propensity score matched cohort. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3,349 patients who underwent TVH-USLS and 484 who underwent TLH-USLS. Patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a significantly higher composite complication rate (11.4% vs 6.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 1.3-2.8; p <.01) and a higher serious complication rate (5.6% vs 3.1%, OR 1.8, 1.1-3.1; p = .02), which excluded urinary tract infection and superficial surgical site infection. The propensity score analysis was performed, and patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio between the TVH-USLS group and the TLH-USLS group. In the matched cohort, patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a higher composite complication rate than those who underwent TLH-USLS (10.3% vs 6.4%, OR 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; p = .04), whereas the rate of serious complications did not differ between the groups (4.3% vs 3.1%, OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .4). On multivariate logistic regression, TVH-USLS remained an independent predictor of composite complications (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.6; p = .04) but not serious complications (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .3). CONCLUSION: In this large national cohort, TVH-USLS was associated with a higher composite complication rate than TLH-USLS, largely secondary to an increased rate of urinary tract infection. After matching, the groups had similar rates of serious complications. These data suggest that TLH-USLS should be viewed as a safe alternative to TVH-USLS.