Literature DB >> 32450199

Susceptibility to HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in highly treatment-experienced patients who failed an INSTI-based regimen.

Maria M Santoro1, Chiara Fornabaio2, Marina Malena3, Laura Galli4, Andrea Poli4, Marianna Menozzi5, Maurizio Zazzi6, Kirsten L White7, Antonella Castagna4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the genotypic and phenotypic resistance profile to the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir (BIC) and other INSTIs in patients who previously failed twice-daily raltegravir (RAL)-based or twice-daily dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens. Twenty-two samples were collected after failure on an INSTI-based regimen in 17 highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 with multi-drug-resistant virus, recorded in the Italian PRESTIGIO registry. Genotypic resistance mutations and phenotypic susceptibility to INSTIs were detected by GeneSeqIN and PhenoSenseIN assays, respectively (Monogram Biosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA). The primary INSTI resistance substitutions E138A/K, G140S, Y143C/H/R, Q148H and N155H were detected in 14 of 22 samples and were associated with resistance to one or more INSTIs, with G140S+Q148H present in 11 of 22 samples. Of these 14 samples, all showed high levels of resistance to elvitegravir (EVG) and RAL. Two isolates contained L74M, E138K, G140S and Q148H, or L74M, T97A, S119T, E138K, G140S, Y143R and Q148H, and had high-level resistance to all INSTIs, including BIC and DTG. Intermediate resistance was reported for eight of 14 isolates for BIC and nine of 14 isolates for DTG. Overall, for the 14 INSTI-resistant isolates, the median fold-change values in phenotypic susceptibility were: BIC 3.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-66], DTG 6.3 (IQR 0.8->186), EVG >164 (IQR 2.6->164) and RAL >188 (IQR 2.7->197). In conclusion, the study findings supported the in-vitro activity of BIC and DTG against most isolates derived from highly treatment-experienced patients who failed INSTI regimens.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiretroviral therapy; Drug resistance; Drug susceptibility; HIV; Resistance phenotypes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32450199     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

1.  High-level resistance to bictegravir and cabotegravir in subtype A- and D-infected HIV-1 patients failing raltegravir with multiple resistance mutations.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ndashimye; Yue Li; Paul S Reyes; Mariano Avino; Abayomi S Olabode; Cissy M Kityo; Fred Kyeyune; Immaculate Nankya; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu; Stephen D Barr; Eric J Arts
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 2.  Structure and function of retroviral integrase.

Authors:  Goedele N Maertens; Alan N Engelman; Peter Cherepanov
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Long Dissociation of Bictegravir from HIV-1 Integrase-DNA Complexes.

Authors:  Kirsten L White; Nathan Osman; Ernesto Cuadra-Foy; Bluma G Brenner; Devleena Shivakumar; Federico Campigotto; Manuel Tsiang; Philip A Morganelli; Nikolai Novikov; Scott E Lazerwith; Haolun Jin; Anita Niedziela-Majka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Brief Report: Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Efficacy in Participants With Preexisting Primary Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Through 48 Weeks of Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michelle L D'Antoni; Kristen Andreatta; Rima Acosta; Hal Martin; Silvia Chang; Ross Martin; Kirsten L White
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.771

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.