Irene Galani1,2, Vassiliki Papoutsaki3, Irene Karantani3, Ilias Karaiskos4, Lamprini Galani4, Panagiota Adamou1, Ioannis Deliolanis5, Antigoni Kodonaki5, Eleni Papadogeorgaki6, Margarita Markopoulou6, Sofia Maraki7, Maria Damala8, Eleni Prifti8, Eleni Vagiakou9, Efthimia Petinaki10, Kimon Fountoulis11, Sophia Tsiplakou12, Helen Kirikou13, Maria Souli1, Anastasia Antoniadou1, Helen Giamarellou4. 1. Infectious Diseases Laboratory, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2. University General Hospital 'ATTIKON', Chaidari, Athens, Greece. 3. Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Hygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece. 4. 1st Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases Clinic, Hygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece. 5. Department of Microbiology, 'Laikon' General Hospital, Athens, Greece. 6. Microbiology Laboratory, Hygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece. 7. Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Parasitology, Zoonoses and Geographical Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece. 8. Microbiology Department, 'Alexandra' General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece. 9. Microbiology Laboratory, General Hospital of Athens 'G. Gennimatas', Athens, Greece. 10. Department of Microbiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece. 11. Microbiology Department, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece. 12. Microbiology Department, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece. 13. Microbiology Department, Agia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against MDR non-MBL Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from nine Greek hospitals and we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between ceftolozane/tazobactam and amikacin. METHODS: A total of 160 non-MBL P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2016 were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and seven comparator agents including ceftazidime/avibactam. Time-kill assays were performed for synergy testing using ceftolozane/tazobactam 60 or 7.5 mg/L, corresponding to the peak and trough concentrations of a 1.5 g q8h dose, respectively, in combination with 69 mg/L amikacin, corresponding to the free peak plasma concentration. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. RESULTS: Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 64.4% of the P. aeruginosa strains at ≤4 mg/L. Colistin was the most active agent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 96.3% susceptible) followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/L; 80.6% susceptible). GES-type enzymes were predominantly responsible for ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance; 81.6% of the non-producers were susceptible. MICs for the P. aeruginosa isolates selected for synergy testing were 2-32 mg/L ceftolozane/tazobactam and 2-128 mg/L amikacin. The combination of ceftolozane/tazobactam with amikacin was synergistic against 85.0% of all the isolates tested and against 75.0% of the GES producers. No antagonistic interactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated good in vitro activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including strains with co-resistance to other antipseudomonal drugs. In combination with amikacin, a synergistic interaction at 24 h was observed against 85.0% of P. aeruginosa strains tested, including isolates with ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs of 32 mg/L or GES producers.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against MDR non-MBL Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from nine Greek hospitals and we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between ceftolozane/tazobactam and amikacin. METHODS: A total of 160 non-MBL P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2016 were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and seven comparator agents including ceftazidime/avibactam. Time-kill assays were performed for synergy testing using ceftolozane/tazobactam 60 or 7.5 mg/L, corresponding to the peak and trough concentrations of a 1.5 g q8h dose, respectively, in combination with 69 mg/L amikacin, corresponding to the free peak plasma concentration. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. RESULTS: Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 64.4% of the P. aeruginosa strains at ≤4 mg/L. Colistin was the most active agent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 96.3% susceptible) followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/L; 80.6% susceptible). GES-type enzymes were predominantly responsible for ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance; 81.6% of the non-producers were susceptible. MICs for the P. aeruginosa isolates selected for synergy testing were 2-32 mg/L ceftolozane/tazobactam and 2-128 mg/L amikacin. The combination of ceftolozane/tazobactam with amikacin was synergistic against 85.0% of all the isolates tested and against 75.0% of the GES producers. No antagonistic interactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS:Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated good in vitro activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including strains with co-resistance to other antipseudomonal drugs. In combination with amikacin, a synergistic interaction at 24 h was observed against 85.0% of P. aeruginosa strains tested, including isolates with ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs of 32 mg/L or GES producers.