Literature DB >> 32449794

Delivering healthcare's 'triple aim': electronic health records and the health research participant in the UK National Health Service.

David Wyatt1,2, Scott Lampon1,2, Christopher McKevitt1,2.   

Abstract

The UK National Health Service (NHS) is changing. Consecutive UK industrial strategies have supported the shift from an NHS that provides free-at-point-of-delivery healthcare to one that also facilitates research. Said to promote healthcare's triple aim of 'better health, better healthcare, and lower cost' (Wachter, 2016, 3), the digitisation of patient records is a core part in opening routine aspects of the health system to potential research. In this paper, we thematically analyse 11 policy documents and ask, how does the NHS discuss its decision to digitise patient records and what are the implications of such practices on the citizen? We document how (1) digitisation is presented as a collective endeavour for patients and NHS professionals, offering new possibilities for patients to participate in their own health and that of the population through research and, (2) digitisation contributes to the building of an efficient health system. Through this analysis we reflect on how discussions of digitisation present uncritically the potential of Electronic Health Records and big data analytics to improve care and generate wealth through research, and reconfigure patienthood, by placing research participation as a routine part of accessing NHS healthcare.
© 2020 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL (SHIL).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Health Records; National Health Service; digitisation; health data; patienthood; research participation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449794     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  3 in total

1.  Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK.

Authors:  Linda A Jones; Jenny R Nelder; Joseph M Fryer; Philip H Alsop; Michael R Geary; Mark Prince; Rudolf N Cardinal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Clinical Network for Big Data and Personalized Health: Study Protocol and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Simona Esposito; Sabatino Orlandi; Sara Magnacca; Amalia De Curtis; Alessandro Gialluisi; Licia Iacoviello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Scoping review exploring the impact of digital systems on processes and outcomes in the care management of acute kidney injury and progress towards establishing learning healthcare systems.

Authors:  Clair Ka Tze Chew; Helen Hogan; Yogini Jani
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.