| Literature DB >> 32449623 |
Ronit Peled-Laskov1, Efrat Shoham1, Lutzy Cojocaru1, Hanit Cohen2.
Abstract
The aim of the present research is to examine the relationship between participation in the Enlightened Youth project for youths at risk and integration in employment at the end of the process, type of employment, dropout from school, and enlistment in the army. A database was prepared containing information on all the youths (499 in number) who were admitted to a multidisciplinary day Centre for Youths at Risk in Israel, of whom 86 participated in the project. To match a comparison group to the youths participating in the project, the propensity score matching method was operated. The research findings show a significant correlation between participation in the project and all the parameters examined, with implications regarding employment as a contributing factor among youths at risk, in terms of their personal lives, as well as financial and social well-being.Entities:
Keywords: Enlightened Youth project; integration in employment; propensity score matching; rehabilitation; youths at risk
Year: 2020 PMID: 32449623 PMCID: PMC7970308 DOI: 10.1177/0306624X20923263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ISSN: 0306-624X
Comparison Between the Participating Group and Nonparticipating Group in the Project Before and After Matching Based on Propensity Scores.
| Before matching
( | After matching
( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participating ( | Nonparticipating ( | % bias[ | Participating ( | Nonparticipating ( | % bias | |
| Gender (boys) | 85% | 79% | 14.3 | 85% | 90% | −16.1 |
| Age | 18.52 | 20.32 | −68.7 | 18.52 | 18.29 | 7.1 |
| Characterization of the youth (alienated) | 43% | 57% | −27.4 | 43% | 47% | −7.5 |
| Criminal record | 36% | 42% | −12.5 | 36% | 37% | −2.5 |
| Residence | ||||||
| South | 73% | 19.6 | 19.6 | 73% | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Central | 17% | 18.9− | −18.9 | 17% | −12.1 | −12.1 |
| North | 34% | 10.3− | −10.3 | 34% | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sojourn in hostel | 34% | 21% | 7.9 | 34% | 34% | 7.4 |
Note. a% bias is standardized mean difference between groups, defined as , where are the mean and variance for participation in the project group and are the mean and variance for comparison group.
p < .05. **p < .01.
Relationship Between Participation in the Project and Integration in Employment on Completion of the Process in the Centre.
| Integrated in employment on completion of the
process | Not integrated in employment on completion of the
process | χ2(1) | φ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participated in the project | 93.0% | 7.0% | 22.83 | 0.364 |
| Did not participate in the project | 62.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Total | 77.9% | 22.1% |
Note. **p < .01.
Relationship Between Participation in the Project and Type of Employment After Integration in Employment (Legal Versus Black Market Work).
| Legal work | Black market work | χ2(1) | φ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participated in the project | 80.0% | 20.0% | 46.51 | 0.589 |
| Did not participate in the project | 20.4% | 79.6% | ||
| Total | 56.0% | 44.0% |
Note. **p < .01.
Relationship Between Participation in the Project and Prevention of Dropout From School/Integration in School.
| Dropout from school
prevented | Dropout from school not
prevented | χ2(1) | φ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participated in the project | 82.6% | 17.4% | 15.54 | 0.301 |
| Did not participate in the project | 54.7% | 45.3% | ||
| Total | 68.6% | 31.4% |
Note. **p < .01.
Relationship Between Participation in the Project and Enlistment in the Army or National Service.
| Enlisted in the IDF/National
Service | Did not enlist in the IDF/National
Service | χ2(1) | φ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participated in the project | 53.6% | 46.4% | 23.04 | 0.456 |
| Did not participate in the project | 10.9% | 89.1% | ||
| Total | 32.4% | 67.6% |
Note. IDF = Israel Defence Forces.
p < .01.