Literature DB >> 32449533

Misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences for thinness and muscularity.

Xue Lei1, David Perrett1.   

Abstract

Thin and muscular have been characterized as ideals for women and men, respectively. Little research has investigated whether men and women have accurate perceptions of opposite-sex preferences of thinness and muscularity. Further, no study has explored whether opposite-sex perceptions of thinness and muscularity preferences differ for short-term and long-term relationships. The present study set out to address these questions. We used interactive 3D human models to represent bodies varying in size (body mass index/BMI weight scaled by height) and body composition. University-aged (18-31) White European heterosexual men and women were asked to choose their own and ideal body shape, the ideal body shape for a short- and a long-term partner, and the body shape they thought the opposite-sex would most like for short- and long-term partners. Women overestimated the thinness that men prefer in a partner and men overestimated the heaviness and muscularity that women prefer in a partner. These misperceptions were more exaggerated for short-term relationships than for long-term relationships. The results illustrate the importance of investigating misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences and raise the possibility that correcting misperceptions might have utility in reducing body dissatisfaction or eating disorders.
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attractiveness; body size; misperception; muscularity; preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449533     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  5 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of the protective measure theory in explaining the role of childhood sexual abuse in eating disorders, addictions, and obesity: an updated model with emphasis on biological embedding.

Authors:  David A Wiss; Timothy D Brewerton; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females.

Authors:  William D Lassek; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 3.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

4.  Sex Differences in Physical Attractiveness Investments: Overlooked Side of Masculinity.

Authors:  Marta Kowal; Piotr Sorokowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Lean Body Mass and Self-Perceived Body Image among Youth in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Hayder A Hasan; Hadia Radwan; Fatma Al Majid; Fatma Al Hilo; Rahaf Mohammed; Shooq Al Shaikh; Asma I Al Qassim; Hajer Aboubaker; Mirey Karavetian
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.