Literature DB >> 32449021

New onset of loss of smell or taste in household contacts of home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects.

Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo1, Daniele Borsetto2, Giacomo Spinato1, Cristoforo Fabbris1, Anna Menegaldo1, Piergiorgio Gaudioso1, Piero Nicolai3, Giancarlo Tirelli4, Maria Cristina Da Mosto1, Roberto Rigoli5, Jerry Polesel6, Claire Hopkins7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of smell or taste impairment in household contacts of mildly symptomatic home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on ad hoc questions.
RESULTS: Of 214 mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients managed at home under self-isolation, 179 reported to have at least one household contact, with the total number of no study participants contacts being 296. Among 175 household contacts not tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 67 (38.3%) had SARS-CoV-2 compatible symptoms, 39 (22.3%) had loss of smell or taste with 7 (4.0%) having loss of smell or taste in the absence of other symptoms. The prevalence of smell or taste impairment was 1.5% in patients tested negative compared to 63.0% of those tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Smell or taste impairment are quite common in not-tested household contacts of mildly symptomatic home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. This should be taken into account when estimating the burden of loss of sense of smell and taste during COVID-19 pandemic, and further highlights the value of loss of sense of smell and taste as a marker of infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anosmia; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Household contacts; Smell and taste loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449021      PMCID: PMC7245639          DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06066-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


Introduction

There is mounting evidence that a new onset of altered sense of smell or taste is strongly related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The prevalence of self-reported smell or taste impairment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from 11 to 87% in severe and mild-moderate cases, respectively [1, 2]. Moreover, the objective evaluation of the sense of smell showed that self-reporting surveys may even underestimate the prevalence of anosmia in COVID-19 patients [3, 4]. According to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and having mild illness and no risk factors can be managed at home, as long as they can be followed up and cared for by family members [5]. In our region, following the recommendations of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [6], household contacts of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects are placed in self-isolation for 14 days with daily monitoring for COVID-19 symptoms, including fever of any grade, cough or difficulty breathing, with nasopharyngeal and throat swabs being performed only in subjects that develop these symptoms. However, a substantial proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections may be asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic [7] with the sudden onset of the loss of sense of smell or taste reported as isolated symptom in 3% of cases [8]. To better estimate the burden of smell and taste impairment during COVID-19 pandemic, we searched for the prevalence of these symptoms in subjects at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, i.e. household contacts of mildly symptomatic home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.

Methods

We previously reported the prevalence of loss of the sense of smell or taste as well as other COVID-19 symptoms in a case series of 202 home-isolated mildly symptomatic confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. All these patients and an additional 27 other subjects with PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infection residents in Treviso province, Italy, were contacted during March and April 2020, to record symptoms and their evolution. During telephone interviews, home-isolated patients were questioned regarding the presence of adult (≥ 18 years) home-isolated household contacts. Consenting household contacts were then themselves asked about the presence of COVID-19-related symptomatology, as well as about new onset of smell or taste impairment. To reduce respondent burden, we omitted to address the intensity and the timing of the onset of smell or taste loss in respect to other symptoms. Household contacts were asked if they had undergone nasopharyngeal and throat swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection and the testing result. All residents in Treviso province are referred to COVID-19 referral center where, according to WHO recommendations [9], SARS-CoV-2 infection is searched for by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal and throat swabs. Symptom prevalence was expressed as the percentage of total patients, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper–Pearson method. Prevalences were compared using Fisher exact test. P values < 0.05 (two sided) were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R 3.6. The study was conducted with the approval of the institutional ethical review board and informed consent was obtained verbally for telephone interviews.

Results

Of 229 mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients, 214 (93.4%) were successfully contacted: two patients died after study enrollment due to a sudden and rapid deterioration of general conditions and additional 13 patients, of which two needed hospitalization, did not answer or refused the interview. Among these 214 patients, 179 reported to have at least one household contact during their home isolation period, with the total number of study participant’s contacts available for the interview being 296. Table 1 shows symptoms experienced by 296 household contacts of home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects according to the swab test. Overall, 74 (25.0%, 95% CI 20.2–30.3%) household contacts complained new onset of the loss of smell or taste.
Table 1

Symptoms in 296 household contacts of 179 home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects

SymptomsRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2Fisher exact test
Tested positiveTested negativeNot tested
n(%)(95% CI)n(%)(95% CI)n(%)(95% CI)
Total patients5418.36722.617559.1
 Fever2953.7(39.6–67.4)1217.9(9.6–29.2)6537.1(30.0–44.8)p < 0.001
 Dry or productive cough2138.9(25.9–53.1)1014.9(7.4–25.7)3922.3(16.4–29.2)p = 0.008
 Problems breathing1425.9(15.0–39.7)11.5(0.0–8.0)31.7(0.0–4.9)p < 0.001
 Altered sense of smell or taste3463.0(48.7–75.7)11.5(0.0–8.0)3922.3(16.4–29.2)p < 0.001
 Other symptoms2138.9(25.9–53.1)4770.1(57.7–80.7)4123.4(17.4–30.4)p < 0.001
 No symptoms00.0(0.0–6.6)46.0(1.7–14.6)5933.7(26.8–41.2)p < 0.001

SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, RT-PCR real-time polymerase chain reaction

Symptoms in 296 household contacts of 179 home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, RT-PCR real-time polymerase chain reaction Of these, 121 underwent nasopharyngeal and throat swabs to detect SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: 54 household contacts tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 34 (63.0%, 95% CI 48.7–75.7) had loss of smell or taste, while 67 tested negative and 1 (1.5%, 95% CI 0.0–8.0) had loss of smell or taste. Thus, a new onset of altered sense of smell and taste has reported a sensitivity of 63.0% (95% CI 48.7–75.7%) and a specificity of 98.5% (95% CI 92.0–100%) in detecting COVID-19-positive patients, with a positive predictive value of 97.1% (95% CI 85.1–100%) and a negative predictive value of 76.7% (95% CI 66.4–85.2%). Among 175 household contacts not tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 67 (38.3%, 95% CI 31.1–45.9%) had SARS-CoV-2-compatible symptoms, 39 (22.3%, 95% CI 16.4–29.2%) had loss of smell or taste with 7 (4.0%, 95% CI 1.6–8.1%) having loss of smell or taste in the absence of other symptoms. Thus, the prevalence of altered sense of smell or taste was by far lower in subjects negative to SARS-CoV-2 compared to both positives (p < 0.001) and non-tested cases (p < 0.001).

Discussion

The prevalence of smell or taste impairment in household contacts of mildly symptomatic home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was 1.5%, 22.3%, and 63.0% in subjects tested negative, non-tested, and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, respectively. These results confirmed previously reported data showing that about two-thirds of mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients complain of an altered sense of smell or taste [8]. This is in line with experimental evidence that the transmembrane serine protease 2 and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the two key players in the binding and entry of the SARS-CoV-2 into human cells, are highly co-expressed in olfactory sustentacular cells [10], thus making this a potential target for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our region, nasopharyngeal and throat swabs are indicated in household contacts of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects that develop COVID-19-related symptoms. Unfortunately, due to the temporary lack of resources (either test swabs or transportation) or patients’ impaired health, co-morbidities, and preferences, not all symptomatic patients have been tested. Thus, in this study, we observed that many household contacts not-tested for SARS-CoV-2 had symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and a substantial proportion complained an altered sense of smell or taste. However, 7 subjects reported only altered sense of smell or taste. There remains a paucity of data on the risks of household transmission—although cohabiting family members are advised to maintain social distancing as the risk of transmission is thought to be high, recent reports give secondary transmission rates of 16 [11]–30% [12]. Our study found 54 confirmed secondary infections and 75 likely cases who were not tested, suggesting a secondary infection rate of 43%. The fact that only a few patients in the group, tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported the absence of symptoms depends primarily on the selection bias as the public health indications are to perform the swab in symptomatic contacts. However, in most cases (70%), these were nonspecific symptoms that did not include fever, cough, or respiratory problems. In the United Kingdom, where only symptomatic patients are tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, among 1,460,517 people being tested so far, as many as 1,234,054 (84.5%) tested negative [13]. Conversely, the prevalence of smell or taste impairment was rare in patients tested negative, thus showing that a new onset of altered sense of smell or taste has a high positive predictive value of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This makes it a very useful marker of infection where the capacity for testing is limited. These results must be taken cautiously, due to several study limitations: data were self-reported, based on ad hoc questions, the sample was is relatively small, and only subjects ≥ 18 years were considered. However, this study showed that smell or taste impairment is quite common in not-tested household contacts of mildly symptomatic home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. This should be taken into account when estimating the burden of loss of sense of smell and taste during COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, due to the robust association between the loss of sense of smell or taste and the SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the possible existence of a monosymptomatic form of COVID-19 characterized by isolated smell or taste impairment, the new onset of these symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic should be considered a manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection until proven otherwise.
  9 in total

1.  Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Ling Mao; Huijuan Jin; Mengdie Wang; Yu Hu; Shengcai Chen; Quanwei He; Jiang Chang; Candong Hong; Yifan Zhou; David Wang; Xiaoping Miao; Yanan Li; Bo Hu
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Cristoforo Fabbris; Jerry Polesel; Diego Cazzador; Daniele Borsetto; Claire Hopkins; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: Single-center experience on 72 cases.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Giovanna Deiana; Alessandro Giuseppe Fois; Pietro Pirina; Giordano Madeddu; Andrea De Vito; Sergio Babudieri; Marzia Petrocelli; Antonello Serra; Francesco Bussu; Enrica Ligas; Giovanni Salzano; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Daniele R De Siati; Mihaela Horoi; Serge D Le Bon; Alexandra Rodriguez; Didier Dequanter; Serge Blecic; Fahd El Afia; Lea Distinguin; Younes Chekkoury-Idrissi; Stéphane Hans; Irene Lopez Delgado; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Philippe Lavigne; Chiara Falanga; Maria Rosaria Barillari; Giovanni Cammaroto; Mohamad Khalife; Pierre Leich; Christel Souchay; Camelia Rossi; Fabrice Journe; Julien Hsieh; Myriam Edjlali; Robert Carlier; Laurence Ris; Andrea Lovato; Cosimo De Filippis; Frederique Coppee; Nicolas Fakhry; Tareck Ayad; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  SARS-CoV-2 Receptors and Entry Genes Are Expressed in the Human Olfactory Neuroepithelium and Brain.

Authors:  Leon Fodoulian; Joël Tuberosa; Daniel Rossier; Madlaina Boillat; Chenda Kan; Véronique Pauli; Kristof Egervari; Johannes A Lobrinus; Basile N Landis; Alan Carleton; Ivan Rodriguez
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Zhongliang Wang; Wanli Ma; Xin Zheng; Gang Wu; Ruiguang Zhang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.072

7.  Characteristics of Household Transmission of COVID-19.

Authors:  Wei Li; Bo Zhang; Jianhua Lu; Shihua Liu; Zhiqiang Chang; Cao Peng; Xinghua Liu; Peng Zhang; Yan Ling; Kaixiong Tao; Jianying Chen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID-19.

Authors:  Shima T Moein; Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian; Babak Mansourafshar; Ali Khorram-Tousi; Payam Tabarsi; Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.426

9.  Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19).

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishiura; Tetsuro Kobayashi; Takeshi Miyama; Ayako Suzuki; Sung-Mok Jung; Katsuma Hayashi; Ryo Kinoshita; Yichi Yang; Baoyin Yuan; Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Natalie M Linton
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  The clinical course of smell and taste loss in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

Authors:  A Printza; M Katotomichelakis; S Metallidis; P Panagopoulos; A Sarafidou; V Petrakis; J Constantinidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Taste loss as a distinct symptom of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Hannum; Riley J Koch; Vicente A Ramirez; Sarah S Marks; Aurora K Toskala; Riley D Herriman; Cailu Lin; Paule V Joseph; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences.

Authors:  Christopher S von Bartheld; Molly M Hagen; Rafal Butowt
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  The importance of early detection of ENT symptoms in mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Giulio Costantini; Cristoforo Fabbris; Anna Menegaldo; Francesca Mularoni; Piergiorgio Gaudioso; Monica Mantovani; Daniele Borsetto; Ananth Vijendren; Maria Cristina Da Mosto; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 5.  Prevalence and prognosis of otorhinolaryngological symptoms in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingjing Qiu; Xin Yang; Limei Liu; Ting Wu; Limei Cui; Yakui Mou; Yan Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19 positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Hannum; Vicente A Ramirez; Sarah J Lipson; Riley D Herriman; Aurora K Toskala; Cailu Lin; Paule V Joseph; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-07-06

7.  Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary attack rate.

Authors:  Zachary J Madewell; Yang Yang; Ira M Longini; M Elizabeth Halloran; Natalie E Dean
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-07-31

8.  The prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in covid-19 - A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Wu; Victoria Y Wang; Ya-Hui Chen; Chih-Hung Ku; Pa-Chun Wang
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 1.863

9.  Sudden olfactory loss as an early marker of COVID-19: a nationwide Italian survey.

Authors:  Lucrezia Spadera; Pasquale Viola; Davide Pisani; Alfonso Scarpa; Donatella Malanga; Gerardo Sorrentino; Enrico Madini; Carla Laria; Teodoro Aragona; Gianluca Leopardi; Giandomenico Maggiore; Marco Ciriolo; Luigi Boccuto; Raffaella Pizzolato; Ludovico Abenavoli; Claudia Cassandro; Massimo Ralli; Ettore Cassandro; Giuseppe Chiarella
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.236

10.  Elective tracheostomy during COVID-19 outbreak: to whom, when, how? Early experience from Venice, Italy.

Authors:  T Volo; P Stritoni; I Battel; B Zennaro; F Lazzari; M Bellin; L Michieletto; G Spinato; C Busatto; D Politi; R Spinato
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.