Literature DB >> 32448969

Quality management in (prostate) cancer care: what do European cancer control plans tell us?

Tit Albreht1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
PURPOSE: National cancer control plans cf. programmes (NCCPs) are policy instruments to structure, map and organise comprehensive cancer policies in a country or its region. One of their important objectives is improvement of quality in cancer care and control.
METHODS: We explored several methodological papers on NCCPs and analyses on their implementation in the European Union as well as recommendations and guidelines concerning prostate cancer screening and management. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Quality is still not a very common feature of NCCPs as an independent, self-standing issue. Only a handful of countries structured and implemented specific activities to monitor quality of cancer care in their policy documents. In others, quantitative approaches focusing on epidemiology and provision of care are dominant, not focusing on indicators, especially those of process and outcome. In view of that and exploring its position in a broader sense, prostate cancer is poorly represented and insufficiently addressed, in particular with respect to screening, but also in after-care and survivorship challenges.
CONCLUSIONS: Given that methodological tools on NCCPs envisage quality as a separate chapter and an overarching topic in NCCPs, the current situation shows that we are still a long way away from the goals set. Absence of structured approaches for a cancer, such as prostate cancer, in NCCPs demonstrates the lack of consistency on all phases of comprehensive control on a frequent cancer, where practices and outcomes show unacceptable variations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National cancer control programmes; Prostate cancer; Public health; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32448969     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03258-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

Review 1.  The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.

Authors:  Katherine Fleshner; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Structured Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Peter Albers; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Alberto Briganti; James W F Catto; Christopher R Chapple; Francesco Montorsi; Nicolas Mottet; Monique J Roobol; Jens Sønksen; Manfred Wirth; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Cancer prevention policy in the EU: Best practices are now well recognised; no reason for countries to lag behind.

Authors:  Carolina Espina; Isabelle Soerjomataram; David Forman; Jose M Martín-Moreno
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2018-12
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  From quality management to quality improvement-structures, processes and outcomes.

Authors:  Simone Wesselmann; Martin Burchardt; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.