| Literature DB >> 32448904 |
Isabelle Opitz1, Arnaud Scherpereel2,3, Thierry Berghmans4, Ioannis Psallidas5, Markus Glatzer6, David Rigau7, Philippe Astoul8, Servet Bölükbas9, Jeanette Boyd10, Johan Coolen11, Charlotte De Bondt12, Dirk De Ruysscher13, Valerie Durieux14, Corinne Faivre-Finn15, Dean A Fennell16, Francoise Galateau-Salle17, Laurent Greillier18, Mir Ali Hoda19, Walter Klepetko19, Aude Lacourt20, Phil McElnay21, Nick A Maskell22, Luciano Mutti23, Jean-Claude Pairon24, Paul Van Schil25, Jan P van Meerbeeck12, David Waller26, Walter Weder1, Paul Martin Putora6,27, Giuseppe Cardillo28.
Abstract
The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally via image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including BAP-1 and CDKN2A (p16) for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pretherapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasize that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres. © The article has been co-published with permission in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the European Respiratory Journal. All rights reserved in respect of European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, © European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2020 and European Respiratory Journal, © European Respiratory Society 2020. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal’s style. Either citation can be used when citing this article.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Guidelines; MPM; Multimodality; Radiotherapy; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32448904 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1010-7940 Impact factor: 4.191