Literature DB >> 32448708

Females with cystic fibrosis have a larger decrease in sweat chloride in response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor compared to males.

B L Aalbers1, R W Hofland2, I Bronsveld2, K M de Winter-de Groot3, H G M Arets3, A C de Kiviet3, M M M van Oirschot-van de Ven3, M A Kruijswijk2, S Schotman2, S Michel3, C K van der Ent3, H G M Heijerman2.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore which patient-related factors influence sweat test response to CFTR modulators, as well as examining the correlation between the sweat chloride response and ppFEV1 or BMI response, using systematically collected real-life clinical data.
METHODS: 160 CF patients were identified who had used lumacaftor/ivacaftor for at least six months. Of these patients, age, sweat chloride levels, ppFEV1 weight and BMI at the start of treatment and after 6 months were collected retrospectively. Pearson and Spearman tests were performed to assess correlations.
RESULTS: Females compared to males in this group showed a larger response in sweat chloride (mean difference 10.6 mmol/l, 95% CI: 5.7-15.4) and BMI (mean difference 0.27 kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.01-0.54). A modest but significant correlation was found between patient weight and sweat chloride response (Pearson R = 0.244, p = 0.001), which diminished upon correction for the other factors. The correlation between sex and sweat chloride response remained; R = 0.253, p = 0.001. Sweat chloride response did not correlate with ppFEV1 change or BMI change at 6 months after start of therapy.
CONCLUSION: Sweat chloride response is larger in females compared to males, which also explains the negative correlation of weight with the response in sweat chloride concentration after start of lumacaftor/ivacaftor. Sweat chloride response does not correlate with the responses in ppFEV1 and BMI. This information may help the interpretation of sweat test results acquired for the follow up and evaluation of CFTR modulating treatments, and warrants further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of sex differences in response to CFTR modulators.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; CFTR modulators; Lumacaftor/ivacator; Sweat chloride; Sweat test; Treatment response; ppFEV1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32448708     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cyst Fibros        ISSN: 1569-1993            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

1.  Measuring the impact of CFTR modulation on sweat chloride in cystic fibrosis: Rationale and design of the CHEC-SC study.

Authors:  Edith T Zemanick; Michael W Konstan; Donald R VanDevanter; Steven M Rowe; J P Clancy; Katherine Odem-Davis; Michelle Skalland; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Clinical Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in People with Cystic Fibrosis: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David P Nichols; Alex C Paynter; Sonya L Heltshe; Scott H Donaldson; Carla A Frederick; Steven D Freedman; Daniel Gelfond; Lucas R Hoffman; Andrea Kelly; Michael R Narkewicz; Jessica E Pittman; Felix Ratjen; Margaret Rosenfeld; Scott D Sagel; Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg; Pradeep K Singh; George M Solomon; Michael S Stalvey; John P Clancy; Shannon Kirby; Jill M Van Dalfsen; Margaret H Kloster; Steven M Rowe
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 30.528

Review 3.  Potential of Intestinal Current Measurement for Personalized Treatment of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Simon Y Graeber; Constanze Vitzthum; Marcus A Mall
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.