Itsuto Hamano1, Shingo Hatakeyama2, Takeshi Fujita3, Reiichi Murakami3, Tomoko Hamaya1, Kyo Togashi1, Yuichiro Suzuki1, Hayato Yamamoto1, Tohru Yoneyama4, Takahiro Yoneyama4, Yasuhiro Hashimoto1, Shunji Narumi5, Hirofumi Tomita3, Chikara Ohyama6. 1. Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan. 2. Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki, Japan. Electronic address: shingoh@hirosaki-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan. 4. Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan. 5. Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. 6. Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation from marginal donors is an important solution for organ shortage problems. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of living kidney transplantation from marginal donors at our hospitals. METHODS: Between June 2006 and April 2019, 107 patients underwent living kidney transplantation at our hospitals. Marginal donors were defined as those with 1. age >70 years, 2. hypertension, 3. creatinine clearance <80 mL/min, 4. body mass index >30 kg/m2, or 5. hemoglobin A1c >6.2%. We retrospectively compared renal function and its chronological changes between marginal and standard donors. We also compared graft survival and recipient renal function between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one (29%) donors were defined as marginal. The primary reason for being defined as marginal was hypertension (74%). The mean age of the marginal donors (62 ± 10 years) was higher than that of standard donors (52 ± 12 years, P < .001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after transplantation was lower in the marginal group, whereas the decline ratio of eGFR was not different between the marginal and standard donors. Five-year graft survival of transplantations from marginal donors (89%) was not significantly inferior to that from standard donors (95%). Meanwhile, recipient eGFR was lower in transplantation from marginal donors than standard donors from 1 month through 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the decline ratios of donor eGFR and graft survival. Thus, transplantation from marginal donors may be a feasible solution for donor shortage problems.
INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation from marginal donors is an important solution for organ shortage problems. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of living kidney transplantation from marginal donors at our hospitals. METHODS: Between June 2006 and April 2019, 107 patients underwent living kidney transplantation at our hospitals. Marginal donors were defined as those with 1. age >70 years, 2. hypertension, 3. creatinine clearance <80 mL/min, 4. body mass index >30 kg/m2, or 5. hemoglobin A1c >6.2%. We retrospectively compared renal function and its chronological changes between marginal and standard donors. We also compared graft survival and recipient renal function between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one (29%) donors were defined as marginal. The primary reason for being defined as marginal was hypertension (74%). The mean age of the marginal donors (62 ± 10 years) was higher than that of standard donors (52 ± 12 years, P < .001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after transplantation was lower in the marginal group, whereas the decline ratio of eGFR was not different between the marginal and standard donors. Five-year graft survival of transplantations from marginal donors (89%) was not significantly inferior to that from standard donors (95%). Meanwhile, recipient eGFR was lower in transplantation from marginal donors than standard donors from 1 month through 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the decline ratios of donor eGFR and graft survival. Thus, transplantation from marginal donors may be a feasible solution for donor shortage problems.