| Literature DB >> 32448227 |
Maiko Abe1, Kazuko Omodaka1,2, Tsutomu Kikawa3, Toru Nakazawa4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic power of radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, measured with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), in patients with superior segmental optic hypoplasia (SSOH).Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Radial peripapillary capillary density; Superior segmental optic hypoplasia
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32448227 PMCID: PMC7245833 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01453-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Representative normal and SSOH subjects and the regional diagnostic power of RPC density for SSOH. a, b: Fundus photography. c, d: RPC density measured with OCT-A. A, C: Normal subject. b, d: SSOH subject. e, f: Grayscale map of the visual field obtained with the Humphrey field analyzer in the SSOH patient (E: baseline, F 3 years later). G Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for superior-quadrant cpRNFLT. H: ROC curve for the 1 o’clock sector of cpRNFLT
Comparison of RPC density in normal and SSOH subjects
| RPC (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (n = 40) | SSOH ( | ||
| Average | 46.1 ± 3.3 | 39.6 ± 4.7 | < 0.001*** |
| Superior | 50.3 ± 7.1 | 36.6 ± 7.1 | < 0.001*** |
| Nasal | 37.6 ± 5.7 | 31.5 ± 8.1 | < 0.001*** |
| Inferior | 50.7 ± 5.8 | 44.0 ± 10.2 | < 0.001*** |
| Temporal | 45.9 ± 5.6 | 46.3 ± 6.6 | 0.756 |
| Superior | |||
| 11 | 56.6 ± 8.4 | 49.6 ± 10.7 | 0.002** |
| 12 | 43.0 ± 11.7 | 30.5 ± 13.3 | < 0.001*** |
| 1 | 51.5 ± 11.2 | 30.3 ± 12.9 | < 0.001*** |
| Nasal | |||
| 2 | 42.7 ± 9.5 | 33.6 ± 13.7 | < 0.001*** |
| 3 | 31.6 ± 8.1 | 29.0 ± 10.9 | 0.238 |
| 4 | 38.7 ± 7.8 | 32.0 ± 11.7 | 0.004** |
| Inferior | |||
| 5 | 45.9 ± 9.9 | 36.8 ± 12.5 | < 0.001*** |
| 6 | 44.9 ± 8.5 | 41.3 ± 13.6 | 0.158 |
| 7 | 61.3 ± 9.0 | 54.9 ± 11.3 | 0.007** |
| Temporal | |||
| 8 | 46.5 ± 8.3 | 47.2 ± 8.6 | 0.700 |
| 9 | 38.2 ± 7.3 | 41.9 ± 8.1 | 0.039* |
| 10 | 52.7 ± 8.9 | 50.0 ± 10.7 | 0.226 |
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Diagnosis power of localized RPC density in normal and SSOH subjects
| AUC of RPC (%) | |
|---|---|
| Average | 0.879 |
| Superior | 0.928 |
| Nasal | 0.744 |
| Inferior | 0.706 |
| Temporal | 0.520 |
| Superior | |
| 11 | 0.692 |
| 12 | 0.769 |
| 1 | 0.896 |
| Nasal | |
| 2 | 0.729 |
| 3 | 0.637 |
| 4 | 0.693 |
| Inferior | |
| 5 | 0.709 |
| 6 | 0.614 |
| 7 | 0.669 |
| Temporal | |
| 8 | 0.513 |
| 9 | 0.628 |
| 10 | 0.563 |
Comparison of RPC density in SSOH and glaucoma subjects and the diagnostic power of regional RPC density for SSOH
| RPC (%) | AUC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSOH ( | Glaucoma ( | |||
| Average | 57.3 ± 11.1 | 54.7 ± 10.4 | 0.391 | 0.568 |
| Superior | 56.8 ± 15.7 | 62.3 ± 18.7 | 0.268 | 0.592 |
| Nasal | 35.7 ± 19.1 | 46.8 ± 15.4 | 0.029* | 0.688 |
| Inferior | 68.5 ± 15.8 | 55.8 ± 14.9 | 0.005** | 0.725 |
| Temporal | 68.7 ± 11.0 | 55.0 ± 13.0 | < 0.001*** | 0.781 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001