Literature DB >> 32447442

Observation vs. early drainage for grade IV blunt renal trauma: a multicenter study.

Ala Chebbi1,2, Benoit Peyronnet3, Anthony Giwerc4, Lucas Freton3, Marine Hutin5, Jonathan Olivier6, Quentin Langouet7, Marina Ruggiero8, Ines Dominique9, Clémentine Millet10, Sébastien Bergerat11, Paul Panayatopoulos12, Reem Betari13, Xavier Matillon9, Thomas Caes6, Pierre-Marie Patard14, Nicolas Szabla15, Nicolas Brichart16, Axelle Boehm7, Laura Sabourin10, Kerem Guleryuz15, Charles Dariane17, Cédric Lebacle8, Jérome Rizk6, Alexandre Gryn14, François-Xavier Madec18, Xavier Rod18, Gaelle Fiard19, Benjamin Pradere7, Christian Pfister4, François-Xavier Nouhaud4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare observation and early drainage by ureteral stenting in patients with blunt renal trauma and urinary extravasation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective national multicenter study was performed including all patients admitted for renal trauma at 17 hospitals between 2005 and 2015. Patients presenting with a urinary extravasation on initial imaging were considered for inclusion. Patients were divided in two groups according to the initial approach: observation vs. early drainage by ureteral stent (within 48 h after admission). The primary endpoint was the persistence of urinary extravasation on follow-up imaging.
RESULTS: Out of 1799 patients with renal trauma, 238 were included in the analysis (57 in the early drainage and 181 in the observation group). In the early drainage group, 29 patients had persistent urinary extravasation vs. 77 in the observation group (50.9% vs. 42.5%; p value = 0.27). The rates of secondary upper urinary tract drainage did not differ significantly between the early drainage group (26.4%) and the observation group (16%) (p = 0.14). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of secondary nephrectomy (0% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.34), and death from trauma (0% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.99). In multivariate analysis, early drainage remained not statistically associated with persistence of urinary extravasation on follow-up imaging (OR = 1.35; p = 0.36)
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort, observation was not different from early drainage in terms of persistent urinary extravasation after grade IV blunt renal trauma. Further randomized controlled prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt renal trauma; Early drainage; Observation; Ureteral stenting; Urinary extravasation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32447442     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03255-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  2 in total

1.  Routine follow-up imaging of kidney injuries may not be justified.

Authors:  Marko Bukur; Kenji Inaba; Galinos Barmparas; Christian Paquet; Charles Best; Lydia Lam; David Plurad; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-05

2.  Blunt renal artery injury: incidence, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  L M Bruce; M A Croce; J M Santaniello; P R Miller; S P Lyden; T C Fabian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.688

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  How early is early? The need for defining "early" intervention in high-grade blunt renal trauma.

Authors:  Ashwin P Shekar; Hardik Patel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Management of urinary extravasation after renal trauma: the need for multi-institutional prospective trials.

Authors:  Sorena Keihani; Jeremy B Myers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.