Literature DB >> 32447058

Identifying Guideline-Practice Gaps to Optimize Evaluation and Management for Patients With Syncope.

Susan Smyth1, Vedant Gupta1, Mark Williams1, Amy Cowley1, Matthew Sirrine1, Hilary Surratt1, Romil Chadha1, Seth Stearley1, Vikas Bhalla1, Jing Li2.   

Abstract

Syncope is a common and complex symptom that requires efficient evaluation to determine the cause. Recent guidelines focus on high-value testing, but a systematic evaluation of their implementation has not been performed. To this end, we used a mixed-methods approach of surveys, chart reviews, and focus groups to understand current practices relating to the diagnosis and management of patients with syncope and to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of guideline-supported recommendations. Surveys were distributed to 1500 providers in the specialties of hospital medicine, cardiology, emergency medicine, and family medicine, and 175 responses were received. Knowledge of class I and III guideline recommendations were assessed with the use of clinical vignettes, which were answered correctly 60%-80% of the time. Chart reviews focused on patient history and testing for syncope. Per the guidelines, < 50% of charts met criteria for bare minimum history and physical examination. Based on the documentation, 25% of echocardiograms and 90% of neurologic testing obtained would not have been appropriate per the guidelines. Self-reported and actual practice patterns were similar in rates of testing. Our results indicate that there remains a gap between guideline-directed management and actual practice for syncope. Focus groups revealed barriers across multiple levels of care that need to be addressed to improve care. Our findings emphasize the need for proactive strategies to improve syncope testing practices, potentially saving millions of dollars in the health care system.
Copyright © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32447058      PMCID: PMC8417752          DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  5 in total

1.  2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Win-Kuang Shen; Robert S Sheldon; David G Benditt; Mitchell I Cohen; Daniel E Forman; Zachary D Goldberger; Blair P Grubb; Mohamed H Hamdan; Andrew D Krahn; Mark S Link; Brian Olshansky; Satish R Raj; Roopinder Kaur Sandhu; Dan Sorajja; Benjamin C Sun; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bishoy Deif; Sally Kang; Abid Ismail; Thuva Vanniyasingam; Juan C Guzman; Carlos A Morillo
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Angel Moya; Frederik J de Lange; Jean-Claude Deharo; Perry M Elliott; Alessandra Fanciulli; Artur Fedorowski; Raffaello Furlan; Rose Anne Kenny; Alfonso Martín; Vincent Probst; Matthew J Reed; Ciara P Rice; Richard Sutton; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Standardized approaches to the investigation of syncope: Canadian Cardiovascular Society position paper.

Authors:  Robert S Sheldon; Carlos A Morillo; Andrew D Krahn; Blair O'Neill; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Ratika Parkash; Mario Talajic; Jack V Tu; Colette Seifer; David Johnstone; Richard Leather
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Kenneth Kwong; George A Wells; Marco L A Sivilotti; Muhammad Mukarram; Brian H Rowe; Eddy Lang; Jeffrey J Perry; Robert Sheldon; Ian G Stiell; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Developing and Demonstrating the Viability and Availability of the Multilevel Implementation Strategy for Syncope Optimal Care Through Engagement (MISSION) Syncope App: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool.

Authors:  Shiraz Amin; Vedant Gupta; Gaixin Du; Colleen McMullen; Matthew Sirrine; Mark V Williams; Susan S Smyth; Romil Chadha; Seth Stearley; Jing Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  "Passing Out is a Serious Thing": Patient Expectations for Syncope Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Jessica Miller Clouser; Matthew Sirrine; Colleen A McMullen; Amy M Cowley; Susan S Smyth; Vedant Gupta; Mark V Williams; Jing Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 3.  Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework.

Authors:  Jing Li; Susan S Smyth; Jessica M Clouser; Colleen A McMullen; Vedant Gupta; Mark V Williams
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Etiology, risk factors, and prognosis of patients with syncope: A single-center analysis.

Authors:  Lin Ling; Tingting Feng; Xiaofeng Xue; Zicheng Ling
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.