Literature DB >> 3244637

Dissolution of ionizable drugs in buffered and unbuffered solutions.

S S Ozturk1, B O Palsson, J B Dressman.   

Abstract

The dissolution kinetics of ionizable drugs (weak acids or bases) are analyzed with a mathematical model derived from the theory of mass transfer with chemical reaction. The model assumes that the overall process is diffusion limited, that all the reactions are reversible and instantaneous, and that dissolution and reaction are limited to the stagnant fluid film adjacent to the solid phase. Dissolution into buffered and unbuffered aqueous solutions are considered separately, with convenient analytical solutions obtained in both cases. In addition, equations for the time to partial and complete dissolution are derived. The dissolution rate is shown to be dependent on the pKa and intrinsic solubility and the medium properties, i.e., pH, buffer capacity, and mass transfer coefficient. Equations of a form analogous to the nonionized case are derived to account explicitly for all these factors, with dissolution rates expressed in terms of the product of a driving force (concentration difference) and resistance (inverse of mass transfer coefficient). The solutions are in an accessible analytical form to calculate the surface pH and subsequently the surface concentrations driving the drug dissolution. Numerical examples to illustrate dissolution into unbuffered and buffered media are presented and the results are shown to be in accord with experimental data taken from the literature.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3244637     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015970502993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  6 in total

1.  SOLUBILITY AND DISSOLUTION RATES IN REACTIVE MEDIA.

Authors:  W I HIGUCHI; E NELSON; J G WAGNER
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Investigation of drug release from solids. II. Theoretical and experimental study of influences of bases and buffers on rates of dissolution of acidic solids.

Authors:  W I HIGUCHI; E L PARROTT; D E WURSTER; T HIGUCHI
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc Am Pharm Assoc       Date:  1958-05

3.  Mixing-tank model for predicting dissolution rate control or oral absorption.

Authors:  J B Dressman; D Fleisher
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Dissolution of carboxylic acids. III: The effect of polyionizable buffers.

Authors:  J G Aunins; M Z Southard; R A Myers; K J Himmelstein; V J Stella
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Dissolution kinetics of carboxylic acids I: effect of pH under unbuffered conditions.

Authors:  K G Mooney; M A Mintun; K J Himmelstein; V J Stella
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Dissolution kinetics of carboxylic acids II: effect of buffers.

Authors:  K G Mooney; M A Mintun; K J Himmelstein; V J Stella
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.534

  6 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  The use of biorelevant dissolution media to forecast the in vivo performance of a drug.

Authors:  Sandra Klein
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Buffer effects on swelling kinetics in polybasic gels.

Authors:  R A Siegel; I Johannes; C A Hunt; B A Firestone
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Dissolution testing as a prognostic tool for oral drug absorption: immediate release dosage forms.

Authors:  J B Dressman; G L Amidon; C Reppas; V P Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Dissolution of ionizable drugs in buffered and unbuffered solution.

Authors:  K J Himmelstein
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Kinetics of release from enteric-coated tablets.

Authors:  S S Ozturk; B O Palsson; B Donohoe; J B Dressman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  pH-Dependent Solubility and Dissolution Behavior of Carvedilol--Case Example of a Weakly Basic BCS Class II Drug.

Authors:  Rania Hamed; Areeg Awadallah; Suhair Sunoqrot; Ola Tarawneh; Sami Nazzal; Tamadur AlBaraghthi; Jihan Al Sayyad; Aiman Abbas
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Toward an in vivo dissolution methodology: a comparison of phosphate and bicarbonate buffers.

Authors:  Jennifer J Sheng; Daniel P McNamara; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Cocrystals to facilitate delivery of poorly soluble compounds beyond-rule-of-5.

Authors:  Gislaine Kuminek; Fengjuan Cao; Alanny Bahia de Oliveira da Rocha; Simone Gonçalves Cardoso; Naír Rodríguez-Hornedo
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Lost in modelling and simulation?

Authors:  Kiyohiko Sugano
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2021-03-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.