Granit Molliqaj1, Luca Paun2, Aria Nouri2, Pierre-Pascal Girod3, Karl Schaller2, Enrico Tessitore2. 1. Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: granit.molliqaj@hcuge.ch. 2. Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Neurosurgical Unit, Innsbruck University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The desire to improve accuracy and safety and to favor minimally invasive techniques has given rise to spinal robotic surgery, which has seen a steady increase in utilization in the past 2 decades. However, spinal surgery encompasses a large spectrum of operative techniques, and robotic surgery currently remains confined to assistance with the trajectory of pedicle screw insertion, which has been shown to be accurate and safe based on class II and III evidence. The role of robotics in improving surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies is less clear, however. METHODS: This comprehensive review of the literature addresses the role of robotics in surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies with a focus on the various meta-analysis and prospective randomized trials published within the past 10 years in the field. RESULTS: It appears that robotic spinal surgery might be useful for increasing accuracy and safety in spinal instrumentation and allows for a reduction in surgical time and radiation exposure for the patient, medical staff, and operator. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgery may thus open the door to minimally invasive surgery with greater security and confidence. In addition, the use of robotics facilitates tireless repeated movements with higher precision compared with humans. Nevertheless, it is clear that further studies are now necessary to demonstrate the role of this modern tool in cost-effectiveness and in improving clinical outcomes, such as reoperation rates for screw malpositioning.
BACKGROUND: The desire to improve accuracy and safety and to favor minimally invasive techniques has given rise to spinal robotic surgery, which has seen a steady increase in utilization in the past 2 decades. However, spinal surgery encompasses a large spectrum of operative techniques, and robotic surgery currently remains confined to assistance with the trajectory of pedicle screw insertion, which has been shown to be accurate and safe based on class II and III evidence. The role of robotics in improving surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies is less clear, however. METHODS: This comprehensive review of the literature addresses the role of robotics in surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies with a focus on the various meta-analysis and prospective randomized trials published within the past 10 years in the field. RESULTS: It appears that robotic spinal surgery might be useful for increasing accuracy and safety in spinal instrumentation and allows for a reduction in surgical time and radiation exposure for the patient, medical staff, and operator. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgery may thus open the door to minimally invasive surgery with greater security and confidence. In addition, the use of robotics facilitates tireless repeated movements with higher precision compared with humans. Nevertheless, it is clear that further studies are now necessary to demonstrate the role of this modern tool in cost-effectiveness and in improving clinical outcomes, such as reoperation rates for screw malpositioning.
Authors: Vittorio Stumpo; Victor E Staartjes; Anita M Klukowska; Aida Kafai Golahmadi; Pravesh S Gadjradj; Marc L Schröder; Anand Veeravagu; Martin N Stienen; Carlo Serra; Luca Regli Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.042