Literature DB >> 32445783

Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for the prediction of neurological outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients.

Florian Ebner1, Marion Moseby-Knappe2, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren3, Gisela Lilja2, Irina Dragancea2, Johan Undén4, Hans Friberg5, David Erlinge6, Jesper Kjaergaard7, Christian Hassager7, Matt P Wise8, Michael Kuiper9, Pascal Stammet10, Michael Wanscher11, Janneke Horn12, Susann Ullén13, Tobias Cronberg2, Niklas Nielsen14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neurological outcome prediction is crucial early after cardiac arrest. Serum biomarkers released from brain cells after hypoxic-ischaemic injury may aid in outcome prediction. The only serum biomarker presently recommended in the European Resuscitation Council prognostication guidelines is neuron-specific enolase (NSE), but NSE has limitations. In this study, we therefore analyzed the outcome predictive accuracy of the serum biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in patients after cardiac arrest.
METHODS: Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 were collected at 24, 48 and 72 h after cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurological function at 6-month follow-up assessed by the cerebral performance category scale (CPC), dichotomized into good (CPC1-2) and poor (CPC3-5). Prognostic accuracies were tested with receiver-operating characteristics by calculating the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and compared to the AUROC of NSE.
RESULTS: 717 patients were included in the study. GFAP and UCH-L1 discriminated between good and poor neurological outcome at all time-points when used alone (AUROC GFAP 0.88-0.89; UCH-L1 0.85-0.87) or in combination (AUROC 0.90-0.91). The combined model was superior to GFAP and UCH-L1 separately and NSE (AUROC 0.75-0.85) at all time-points. At specificities ≥95%, the combined model predicted poor outcome with a higher sensitivity than NSE at 24 h and with similar sensitivities at 48 and 72 h.
CONCLUSION: GFAP and UCH-L1 predicted poor neurological outcome with high accuracy. Their combination may be of special interest for early prognostication after cardiac arrest where it performed significantly better than the currently recommended biomarker NSE.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neurological outcome prognostication; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Serum biomarkers of neurological injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32445783     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  10 in total

1.  Bayesian Outcome Prediction After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Bobby L Jones; Daniel S Nagin; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 11.800

Review 2.  Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.

Authors:  Travis W Murphy; Scott A Cohen; Charles W Hwang; K Leslie Avery; Meenakshi P Balakrishnan; Ramani Balu; Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury; David B Crabb; Yasmeen Elmelige; Carolina B Maciel; Sarah S Gul; Francis Han; Torben K Becker
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Biomarkers of brain injury after cardiac arrest; a statistical analysis plan from the TTM2 trial biobank investigators.

Authors:  Marion Moseby-Knappe; Helena Levin; Kaj Blennow; Susann Ullén; Henrik Zetterberg; Gisela Lilja; Josef Dankiewicz; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Alice Lagebrant; Hans Friberg; Alistair Nichol; Kate Ainschough; Glenn M Eastwood; Matt P Wise; Matthew Thomas; Thomas Keeble; Alain Cariou; Christoph Leithner; Christian Rylander; Joachim Düring; Jan Bělohlávek; Anders Grejs; Ola Borgquist; Johan Undén; Maryline Simon; Vinzent Rolny; Alex Piehler; Tobias Cronberg; Niklas Nielsen
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 4.  Brain Injury Biomarkers for Predicting Outcome After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jaana Humaloja; Nicholas J Ashton; Markus B Skrifvars
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  GFAp and tau protein as predictors of neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A post hoc analysis of the COMACARE trial.

Authors:  Jaana Humaloja; Marika Lähde; Nicholas J Ashton; Matti Reinikainen; Johanna Hästbacka; Pekka Jakkula; Hans Friberg; Tobias Cronberg; Ville Pettilä; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Markus B Skrifvars
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Serum markers of brain injury can predict good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Marion Moseby-Knappe; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Pascal Stammet; Sofia Backman; Kaj Blennow; Josef Dankiewicz; Hans Friberg; Christian Hassager; Janneke Horn; Jesper Kjaergaard; Gisela Lilja; Christian Rylander; Susann Ullén; Johan Undén; Erik Westhall; Matt P Wise; Henrik Zetterberg; Niklas Nielsen; Tobias Cronberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Brain injury, endothelial injury and inflammatory markers are elevated and express sex-specific alterations after COVID-19.

Authors:  Jude Savarraj; Eun S Park; Gabriela D Colpo; Sarah N Hinds; Diego Morales; Hilda Ahnstedt; Atzhiry S Paz; Andres Assing; Fudong Liu; Shivanki Juneja; Eunhee Kim; Sung-Min Cho; Aaron M Gusdon; Pramod Dash; Louise D McCullough; H Alex Choi
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 8.322

8.  Hypothermia for Patients Requiring Evacuation of Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Georgene W Hergenroeder; Shoji Yokobori; Huimahn Alex Choi; Karl Schmitt; Michelle A Detry; Lisa H Schmitt; Anna McGlothlin; Ava M Puccio; Jonathan Jagid; Yasuhiro Kuroda; Yukihiko Nakamura; Eiichi Suehiro; Faiz Ahmad; Kert Viele; Elisabeth A Wilde; Stephen R McCauley; Ryan S Kitagawa; Nancy R Temkin; Shelly D Timmons; Michael N Diringer; Pramod K Dash; Ross Bullock; David O Okonkwo; Donald A Berry; Dong H Kim
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Identification and Validation of Novel Potential Pathogenesis and Biomarkers to Predict the Neurological Outcome after Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Chenyu Zhang; Cong Liu; Haohong Zhan; Bo Li; Yuanzhen Lu; Hongyan Wei; Jingge Cheng; Shuhao Li; Chuyue Wang; Chunlin Hu; Xiaoxing Liao
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 10.  Blood Biomarkers for Detection of Brain Injury in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Steven T DeKosky; Patrick M Kochanek; Alex B Valadka; Robert S B Clark; Sherry H-Y Chou; Alicia K Au; Christopher Horvat; Ruchira M Jha; Rebekah Mannix; Stephen R Wisniewski; Max Wintermark; Susan E Rowell; Robert D Welch; Lawrence Lewis; Stacey House; Rudolph E Tanzi; Darci R Smith; Amy Y Vittor; Nancy D Denslow; Michael D Davis; Olena Y Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.269

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.