Literature DB >> 32445118

Permanent pacemaker implantation rates following cardiac surgery in the modern era.

Jason Kho1, Adam Ioannou2, Katie E O'Sullivan3, Mark Jones4.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after cardiac surgery in our institution and investigate risk factors for PPM dependency to provide patients with accurate incidence figures at the time of consent for surgery.
METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from a single tertiary institution from October 2018 to April 2019 inclusive of 403 patients. Incidence of PPM implantation after various cardiac operations was evaluated. A univariate analysis was carried out to identify the independent risk factors related to PPM implantation.
RESULTS: Ten patients required a PPM (2.48%). The most common indication for PPM implantation post-cardiac surgery was complete heart block (N = 7, 70%) followed by bradycardia/pauses (N = 2, 20%) and sick sinus syndrome (N = 1, 10%). PPM implantation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was the lowest (0.63%), while combined CABG and valve operations had the highest incidence (5.97%). Independent risk predictors for PPM implantation included female gender (p = 0.03), rheumatic heart disease (p = 0.008), pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.01), redo operations (p = 0.002), mitral valve procedures (p = 0.001), tricuspid valve procedures (p = 0.0003) and combined mitral and tricuspid valve procedures (p = 0.0001). Average length of intensive care unit (ICU)/high-dependency unit (HDU) stay was significantly prolonged for patients who required a PPM post-cardiac surgery.
CONCLUSION: As clinicians, it can be challenging to provide our patients with accurate information on the risk of PPM implantation relative to their operation. A unit-specific data may be a more accurate method of informing our patients on this risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Cardiology; Modern era; Permanent pacemaker

Year:  2020        PMID: 32445118     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02254-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  2 in total

1.  Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve in Valve From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Salman Zahid; Muhammad U Khan; Asim Kichloo; Shakeel Jamal; Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas; Waqas Ullah; Yasar Sattar; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Permanent pacemaker placement following valve surgery is not independently associated with worse outcomes.

Authors:  Valentino Bianco; Arman Kilic; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Derek Serna-Gallegos; Courtenay Dunn-Lewis; Shangzhen Chen; Floyd Thoma; Forozan Navid; Ibrahim Sultan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-06-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.