David Bergman1, Ankit Modh1, Lonni Schultz2,3, James Snyder2,4, Tom Mikkelsen2,4, Mira Shah1, Samuel Ryu5, M Salim Siddiqui1, Tobias Walbert6,7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. twalber1@hfhs.org. 7. Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. twalber1@hfhs.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Outcomes for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) progressing onbevacizumab (BEV) are dismal. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) has been shown to be feasible and safe when delivered in this setting, but prospective evidence is lacking. This single-institution randomized trial compared FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy versus BEV-based chemotherapy alone for BEV-resistant recurrent malignant glioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS:HGG patients on BEV with tumor progression after 2 previous treatments were randomized to 1) FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy or 2) BEV-based chemotherapy with irinotecan, etoposide, temozolomide, or carboplatin. FSRS was delivered as 32 Gy (8 Gy × 4 fractions within 2 weeks) to the gross target volume and 24 Gy (6 Gy × 4 fractions) to the clinical target volume (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormality). The primary endpoints were local control (LC) at 2 months and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 29 had glioblastoma (WHO IV) and 6 had anaplastic glioma (WHO III). The median number of prior recurrences was 3. Patients treated with FSRS had significantly improved PFS (5.1 vs 1.8 months, P < .001) and improved LC at 2 months (82% [14/17] vs 27% [4/15], P = .002). The overall median survival was 6.6 months (7.2 months with FSRS vs 4.8 months with chemotherapy alone, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS:FSRS combined with BEV-based chemotherapy in recurrent HGG patients progressing on BEV is feasible and improves LC and PFS when compared to treatment with BEV-based chemotherapy alone.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Outcomes for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) progressing on bevacizumab (BEV) are dismal. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) has been shown to be feasible and safe when delivered in this setting, but prospective evidence is lacking. This single-institution randomized trial compared FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy versus BEV-based chemotherapy alone for BEV-resistant recurrent malignant glioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HGG patients on BEV with tumor progression after 2 previous treatments were randomized to 1) FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy or 2) BEV-based chemotherapy with irinotecan, etoposide, temozolomide, or carboplatin. FSRS was delivered as 32 Gy (8 Gy × 4 fractions within 2 weeks) to the gross target volume and 24 Gy (6 Gy × 4 fractions) to the clinical target volume (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormality). The primary endpoints were local control (LC) at 2 months and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 29 had glioblastoma (WHO IV) and 6 had anaplastic glioma (WHO III). The median number of prior recurrences was 3. Patients treated with FSRS had significantly improved PFS (5.1 vs 1.8 months, P < .001) and improved LC at 2 months (82% [14/17] vs 27% [4/15], P = .002). The overall median survival was 6.6 months (7.2 months with FSRS vs 4.8 months with chemotherapy alone, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: FSRS combined with BEV-based chemotherapy in recurrent HGG patients progressing on BEV is feasible and improves LC and PFS when compared to treatment with BEV-based chemotherapy alone.
Authors: Corbin A Helis; Shih-Ni Prim; Christina K Cramer; Roy Strowd; Glenn J Lesser; Jaclyn J White; Stephen B Tatter; Adrian W Laxton; Christopher Whitlow; Hui-Wen Lo; Waldemar Debinski; James D Ververs; Paul J Black; Michael D Chan Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: T Gupta; M Maitre; P Maitre; J S Goda; R Krishnatry; A Chatterjee; A Moiyadi; P Shetty; S Epari; A Sahay; V Patil; R Jalali Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Antonio Dono; Mark Amsbaugh; Magda Martir; Richard H Smilie; Roy F Riascos; Jay-Jiguang Zhu; Sigmund Hsu; Dong H Kim; Nitin Tandon; Leomar Y Ballester; Angel I Blanco; Yoshua Esquenazi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Sirui Ma; Soumon Rudra; Jian L Campian; Milan G Chheda; Tanner M Johanns; George Ansstas; Christopher D Abraham; Michael R Chicoine; Eric C Leuthardt; Joshua L Dowling; Gavin P Dunn; Albert H Kim; Jiayi Huang Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2021-06-18